Parachains are now officially live on the https://t.co/bq5GFoLbKm explorer.
You can already browse them, and we currently have one collator running for the ProofHub parachain and another for the simulated RWA parachain.
This is a major step forward, as we can now begin expanding the bridging capabilities between parachains.
At the moment, communication is handled through XCM messaging for the privacy workflow, and the next phase is enabling token bridging to create a fully interconnected Layer 1 ecosystem.
https://t.co/E9o4y11yw8
We have uploaded the code for the ProofHub parachain, which is maintained by the project team and serves as the core privacy layer of the protocol.
Other parachains submit private commitments to this parachain via cross-chain messaging.
As visible in the repository, the parachain includes the same proof and verifier pallet used in the original Nulla test chain v0.1.0.
The parachain will be connected to the relay chain once the relay testnet is live.
https://t.co/E9o4y11yw8
We have uploaded the code for the ProofHub parachain, which is maintained by the project team and serves as the core privacy layer of the protocol.
Other parachains submit private commitments to this parachain via cross-chain messaging.
As visible in the repository, the parachain includes the same proof and verifier pallet used in the original Nulla test chain v0.1.0.
The parachain will be connected to the relay chain once the relay testnet is live.
I have to disagree here, Helium is in a very competitive market, they have an edge over everyone with their free plan they should be investing more in marketing, imagine what can that money create in additional revenue as they gain market share.
We should be aiming for 30-40M$ per month in revenue in 2-3 years.
Buy backs will just make no sense, but there is still the buyback from the offload anyway.
My 2 cents here Amir,
I think what you’re saying is a fair argument - but in my opinion there’s also an option 3.
Staking could be a great investor-facing mechanism. Instead of buyback & burn, token holders would need to lock their tokens for a defined period. That creates a real incentive to hold, and it aligns long-term holders with the network’s growth.
And I don’t think this should be framed as “basic crypto tokenomics.” It’s more about where the business is in its lifecycle.
HNT is still in a growth phase. It doesn’t make much sense for a company that’s still capturing market share in a massive industry to allocate profits to buybacks, especially when the ROI on growth is likely much higher. With the growth you’re already seeing, imagine what happens if you deploy an additional $3.2M/month into BD, marketing, user acquisition, and expansion of revenue streams through additional services on the network. The upside is enormous.
So for me the discussion shouldn’t be centered on token price, IPO, etc. For utility tokens, the point is to offer what traditional markets don’t: a globally accessible way for stakeholders to participate in value creation through mechanisms like staking.
The key is timing: staking becomes most meaningful once the business reaches truly scalable, predictable revenue - think hundreds of millions in attainable revenue - and then you dedicate a portion of that to staking rewards in a way that reinforces long-term alignment without sacrificing growth.
Here we go guys, a new release of the desktop wallet is live now (v1.0.2).
This update introduces a new page dedicated to private messaging across the network.
https://t.co/YSSP4AMmiK
DEV node successfully started the new BABE consensus!
This update brings a major consensus change, aiming for seamless switch-over with no block height reset. Next step: full network testing before it hits testnet.
Almost wrapped up. Stay tuned, we are almost there!
🚨HUGE: @grayscale just named @helium a leading force in DePIN in their Q3 2025 crypto sectors report
they analyzed 261 tokens across $3 trillion in market cap and highlighted $HNT as proof that decentralized infrastructure is working today, at scale.
You still are defying the whole purpose why Testnet exist.
The team left this on purpose to avoid having to distribute testnet tokens to everyone.
Its a way to let people play around on testnet, mint and reuse the token so they can create as many transactions as possible and put all the pressure on the test net.
Very normal, on the contrary very encouraging. Security will become needed prior to finishing the encryption phase which matters at this phase.
I know for a fact we’ve got at least 5 Aster whales who are also OG $Astherus Ascendants whales.
When the time comes… expect pure parabola.
Another trading wallet wiped out today, more conviction holders loading up, and the chart is tightening exactly how it should.
This is the window to buy $ASTHERUS before the Aster Meta steamrolls the entire market.
Easiest low-cap play of 2025. Don’t say you weren’t warned. 🔥
CA: 0x39aea3d999eddbfbe73015b9b274cb912a144444
@HNTbandit@helium not just that, Verizon represents only Helium mobile as a comparison. However, Verizon doesn't operate its towers while Helium has a decentralized network , which is way more valuable as well and guarantees better service
legacy giants like Verizon is at a 170B market cap while @Helium is disrupting the whole telecom industry with 500M market cap.
for a network with real usage, $500M feels like the “before the world caught on” phase.
people don’t realize how early this is for $HNT