Your pentest report with 200 vulnerabilities is worse than one with 12 findings tied to actual business impact.
Volume ≠ value in cybersecurity.
How to evaluate real pentest quality: https://t.co/CaBGBAbtFR
If DORA and Threat‑Led Penetration Testing (TLPT) keep coming up in your meetings, but not everyone on the team has the same baseline, this high-level overview might help.
🔗 https://t.co/mpMUYYey1y
#DORA#TLPT#SecurityTesting
Tools are great at quickly flagging common issues; humans are great at digging deeper, chaining vulnerabilities, and explaining what actually matters to your business. See why meaningful security needs expert‑led testing, not just automation: https://t.co/swnCw9UMJE
#InfoSec
Web app pentesting isn’t “run a scan.”
It’s breaking your app the way attackers will: abusing auth flows, business logic, APIs, and JWTs to map a real Path to Compromise.
Read how it actually works: https://t.co/1XXNAltaLX
#AppSec#CyberSecurity#InfoSec
Mythos and the AI hype that will get you breached.
Read our latest post for a reality check on AI and penetration testing: https://t.co/WYXK8chony
#infosec#cybersecurity#Mythos#PenTest#AI
Your network is the backbone of your business. If attackers own it, they own everything connected to it.
New post: what network penetration testing is, when to use it, and how mapping the Path to Compromise helps you prioritize real risk.
https://t.co/eBDdTiIOZ0
GLBA now clearly ties compliance to how you test safeguards: annual penetration testing, bi-annual vuln assessments, and evidence those results drive fixes.
🔗Get the details and a 2026 checklist: https://t.co/YwgfG837Vo
Most "penetration tests" today are just automated scans in disguise. AI & scanners can't find zero-days, test business logic, or map a real attack path.
Compliance theater ≠ security.
Know the difference before your next test.
https://t.co/BrOVEDeIdj
#InfoSec#PenTesting
Orgs still average 194 days to detect a breach. The tools aren’t the problem. The strategy is.
Our new @SCMagazine article covers manual #pentesting, #honeypots in cybersecurity + credential canaries — real #threatintelligence, fraction of the cost.
🔗: https://t.co/VLmoTMOkhF
New on @OTechTalks: Adriel Desautels on how AI actually changes offensive security, why most “AI pentesting” is just a dressed‑up vulnerability scanner, and why you can’t stop every breach - but you can limit the damage.
🔗https://t.co/PrZyMDuPHI
#CyberSecurity#AI#PenTesting
Got SQL creds but xp_cmdshell is disabled and heavily monitored?
Be like Jeremy. 🥷
Jeremy pivoted to Machine Learning Services and the Launchpad service, then created a new Netexec module to gain RCE and even coerce authentication.
Learn more here:
https://t.co/wzPH9N7gu9
Traditional pen tests ask “Where are we vulnerable?” TLPT asks “Can we survive a real attack?” Our latest blog explores why DORA now mandates this intelligence-led testing for key financial entities.
🔗https://t.co/Y178DxJSVH
#CyberSecurity#DORA#TLPT#Infosec
GDPR penalties: up to €20M or 4% of global revenue 😬
The ROI of real penetration testing?
Preventing just one breach pays for years of testing.
Stop settling for checkbox compliance.
Your auditors and your customers’ data deserve better.
https://t.co/KGRgRjKN2o
SOC 2 doesn't technically require penetration testing - but auditors expect it anyway.
Why? Because automated scans can't prove your controls work against real attackers.
Our 2026 guide covers what auditors actually want to see: https://t.co/WVVssaxgqM
#SOC2#PenTesting
Holiday cyberattacks spiked 30%+ while your team ran lean. Most orgs rely on generic threat intel that creates blind spots.
The math is simple: $40K genuine pen test vs $4.8M avg breach cost = 12,000% ROI.
Stop flying blind 👇
https://t.co/fZDF6SQygO
Quality penetration testing delivers 12,000%+ ROI by preventing a single breach. Don't settle for security theater when real protection is possible.
Full guide: https://t.co/zD7B0Ubrmi
Choosing a penetration testing company? Not all are equal. With breach costs averaging $4.8M, here's what separates real security from expensive checkbox exercises:
⚠️Red flags: Count-based pricing, false positives in reports, no retesting, can't show research proof.
✅Green flags: Workload-based pricing, zero false positives, free retesting, published vuln research.