Nett Bas 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

[Nett Bas 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 @nettbas]

"The Claim of Right Act 1689, trumps everything!"
- Roddy Dunlop KC

[Sara Salyers @SSalyers2]

Here's how you can answer that question with certainty.

As you've pointed out the Claim of Right was made a precondition (condition precedent) of the union and the treaty, because it was specifically named in the overall condition precedent - the 1706 Act for the Preservation of the Presbyterian Church. This was ratified word for word, ('by the tenor thereof') along with the Articles of Union as a condition in all time coming. Before the British began reframing the CoR as a sectarian act purely concerned with the religious matters suggested by the title of the 1706 Act, neither the Scots nor the English failed to recognise the significance of the inclusion of the CoR Act, the only named Act, in the overall condition.
Nor did anyone at the time imagine for one moment that it was just a religious statute. It was then and still is the first and only statutory summary of the Scottish constitution and had been used as such to defend the right of protest against William the psycho of Orange.
"The Laws of Government, (in Scotland), continue as the Government continues establish'd in the Claim of Right, I mean as to the Limitations of Government and Obedience", Daniel Defoe, chronicler, Propagandist and English spy. (Note: the Limitations of Government and Obedience is how a constitution is often described both then and now.)
Now, the Claim of Right remains a constitutional statute because otherwise the union is void. But, of course, it is given lip service only and the latest British trick is pretending its all about religion, specifically hatred of Catholics, so people stop noticing or caring. That has been very successful. But the fact that the English agreed to it at the time, in the full knowledge of what it meant, proves there was never any intention to create a single kingdom (single crown) or a new state. (A kingdom is purely the territorial jurisdiction of a crown; you cannot have one without the other.)
Why? Because the CoR requires a lawful monarch - enabling a lawfully assembled legislative parliament, as summoned by a lawful monarch - to take the Scottish Coronation Oath. The Scottish Crown is nothing like the English. It is the legal identity or legal personality of the Community of the Realm and not of the monarch. This is why the Scottish Oath includes a promise by the would-be monarch to defend the Scottish Crown and never to transfer or undermine its rights rents and privileges. (Above all else - and the privilege on which all others depend - is its sovereignty.)
The Treaty of Union, however, calls for a (new) single crown/kingdom. A new single crown would necessitate transferring the sovereignty of the Scottish Crown to a new, merged British Crown. But the condition precedent/sine qua non of the union made that impossible! Just to spell that out: there is a condition on which the Treaty of Union and the Union itself depends - the Claim of Right Act remains in force or there is no treaty and no union. But if the CoR remains in force there can be no single kingdom/crown because the Scottish Crown cannot be undermined or its sovereignty transferred.

No pea brain involved in pushing through the Treaty and Acts could have failed to see that the only way their terms could all have been implemented would have been to impose the Scottish Crown, (with its identity as the people, its monarch just the first among equals with no immunity from legal process and its treason laws protecting the Common Weal and not merely the king or queen), on the new 'Great Britain' in place of the English. And that was never going to happen.
The treaty was impossible to implement. The condition without which it was and is rendered void, the continuation of the CoR, prevents the creation of the 'single kingdom (crown) which is its whole purpose. And because the monarch summons the legislative parliament that makes the joint parliament just as impossible.
Either no one had the brains to realise that or the English pushed the treaty through, by threat of invasion, bribery and coercion and contrary to Scots law, without the slightest intention of implementing. Once it was ratified, they could dismantle the Scottish state in preparation for the new one - and then simply fail to dismantle the English state and instead add Scotland to its control and its crown. That is what they always intended and that is exactly what happened. Cheaper and easier than the alternative - invasion:
"Foreigners say publicly, I mean our own allies, that we [England] are a perfidious nation; and since we have violated our treaty with Scotland and laugh at the notion of fundamental and inviolable articles [of Union], there is no great wonder if we treat other nations as we do." Harley, Robert, "Letter by Lord Harley Earl of Oxford to William Carstares, 1709.

Today, the Brits want the world to believe there really is a British Crown and the treaty really was given effect and they hope no one digs up proof of the continuation of the Scottish Crown or realises what that means about Scotland's legal status in the so-called union. Can you say colony?!

[The Scotland Channel @ScotlandTh82958]

Let’s get Scotland on our TV Screens and let’s give Scotland it’s own voice! #ScottishMedia #ScottishTelevision #MainstreamMedia #UKMedia #Scotland #TheScotlandChannel

[Mia Hughes @_CryMiaRiver]

When WPATH said its Standards of Care 8 was evidence-based, they were lying.

When they said it was science-based, they were lying.

When they said “gender affirming care” was medically necessary, they were lying.

Last year, I asked who had the power to legally destroy them. 

Today, the Federal Trade Commission stepped up to the task.

[Wings Over Scotland @WingsScotland]

This film of Mridul Wadhwa admitting he obtained his job at a rape crisis centre by deception has just been removed by YouTube for "copyright infringement", so please don't watch or share it.

[Nett Bas 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 @nettbas]

@TMS44730 TB❤️

[Moira Waddell @MoiraWaddell7]

@zero_whiteguilt @SSalyers2 There's no need to be rude. If you have any genuine interest in Scotland's future as a nation please follow Liberation Scotland & Sara Salyers. You, like me & thousands were only taught an Anglified version of history.We're a brainwashed Colony!

[Sara Salyers @SSalyers2]

You cannot love what you do not know. If you knew Scotland, her true history, her unique constitution and her centuries of common good statutes and provisions, including an education system that ensured every Scot could read and write by the 1500s while boys got grammar school education in the burghs, if you knew the horrors of the so-called union (a forced treaty whose single kingdom was replaced by subjection of Scotland to a renamed English crown), if you knew what deserts were made where thriving communities were burnt out by an occupation that covered every inch of this land, if you saw the terrible graveyards they are and not your lovely treeless and sheep filled ‘wilderness’, if you loved the real Scotland and not your wee Brigadoon fantasy, you’d want to see her free and restored to her true identity. But you do not love Scotland. You can’t love something imaginary. Actually you are afraid of it and so clearly hostile to those who really do love her. But you keep your ‘love’ of your made up communal version of this nation. And we will go about freeing the real thing.

[Sara Salyers @SSalyers2]

I’m sure those Scots who hate the English will get over it when the truth about the so-called treaty (of union) is universally known; when the truth about the risings against the annexation - for which the treaty provided cover - risings supported by 90% of Scots is told; when the horrific genocide that followed the third attempt of the Scots to get out from under English annexation is finally acknowledged - “slaughter and famine” prescribed by Cumberland and backed by the ‘union’ (ha!) parliament so as to quell the “rebellion” described and acknowledged in Westminster as “*not* a civil war” but an “insurrection”which only a handful of Scots in that “vile spot” did not support; the real start of the clearances in 1706; the occupation that saw ever town and hamlet in Scotland occupied by English troops and the utter deserts (those ‘wild highlands’) where once were busy prosperous communities are seen and commemorated for what they are. When the lie of a voluntary and mutually beneficial union is replace by the horror story that is our real history it can change. see, reconciliation begins with truth.
If you want a first hand account of the slaughter and famine and the delight of the English troops in the burning of whole towns the smoke for miles around “higher than the hills” while all foodstuffs animal or grain were brought to the camps of the English who could eat no more and had to let it go to waste (while the scots starved and died) all this is to be found at the Culloden memorial. (It’s mostly hugely misleading in favour of the false civil/religious war narrative deployed to conceal the horror and the shame of this genocidal slaughter and occupation) But that vivid description is provided from the journal of just one English Captain Ashe-Leigh.
And if that seems like ancient history to you and something we ought to forget, know it blighted my grandparents lives and all their grandparents before them in more ways than I can tell you while its modern form is stealing our resources and seeing our people dying of poverty related diseases and conditions. So maybe you can see why Scot’s - not this one! - hate the English and what will be needed to change that.

[Nett Bas 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 @nettbas]

@benonwine It's about us being controlled.

[SnowflakeSlayer @SnowflakeSlayr1]

@Polymarket 😡

[Republican @RepublicanSons]

The UK can create Sterling to build hospitals, schools and infrastructure, this will reduce employment, ie jobs for all

It chooses not to...

IScotland with its own Central Bank can do all of the below

Even Grok agrees

[Nett Bas 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 @nettbas]

@Katejsm1 @Stephen87386723 You need to do more research before spouting this nonsense.

[Stephen Morrison @Stephen87386723]

Authentic testimonial

[Nett Bas 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 @nettbas]

@john_w_wilcox @thomsonchris Typical English! Thinking they subsidise Scotland! 🙄

[Cocoa Butter @cocoab054]

@CoviLeaks We tried. It's not getting through. People still hold the belief that they can vote their way out of this tyranny.
https://t.co/4uV7lk2vBd

[Fiona Rose Diamond @CoviLeaks]

🚨 The government made their own devices 100% invisible, so they can force yours to be 100% transparent. Did you know this? 🚨

They dodge the laws they force on you.
On us. The people!

Do not take this lightly.
Every MP is exempt.
Every Lord is exempt.
Every elite civil servant is exempt.
EVERY PARASITE IS EXEMPT!

They force the laws on us.
They legally shield themselves.
Total public surveillance.
Total state secrecy.
Absolute parasite immunity.

The well-funded, ‘professional’ campaigns wrap this up in polite, Ofcom-palatable jargon… we need to stop playing nice and call this brutal hypocrisy exactly what it is: a legal coup against our privacy.

If you complain about the length of this post or a 8-minute video, you are part of the problem. No filters and no apologies. Wake up or get out of the way.

🚨 RULES FOR THEE, PRIVACY FOR ME: What you NEED to know!

The UK has engineered a digital dictatorship. They demand total transparency from you, while securing absolute secrecy for themselves. This is not a theory. It is written directly into hard law.

Here is the brutal, stripped-down truth of how the political parasites legally insulated themselves from the surveillance panopticon they are forcing onto the public.

1. The Divine Right of MPs
The Law: Section 26, Investigatory Powers Act 2016
The Privilege: Intelligence agencies cannot touch an MP’s data without a personal, written veto from the Prime Minister.
The Tyranny: Your life is subjected to automated bulk surveillance. Theirs is legally untouchable.

2. The Private Internet Loophole
The Law: Schedule 1, Online Safety Act 2023
The Privilege: Official networks used by Ministers, Lords, and civil servants are explicitly exempt from client-side phone scanning.
The Tyranny: Your personal WhatsApp must be stripped of privacy and screened. Their government-shielded apps are completely walled off.

3. The Unchecked Dictator Veto
The Law: The "Henry VIII" Clauses in the Online Safety Act
The Privilege: Ministers hold secondary legislative powers to alter and expand exemptions via Statutory Instruments.
The Tyranny: If parasite official ever faces a surveillance clause, they can simply rewrite the law behind closed doors without a democratic vote.

4. The Weaponised Wilson Doctrine
The Law: Codified Parliamentary Surveillance Protections
The Privilege: The police and security services are completely banned from tracking, tapping, or snooping on politicians.
The Tyranny: The very individuals voting to turn your smartphone into an informant are constitutionally protected from ever experiencing the consequences of their own votes.

💥 THE VERDICT
This is the textbook definition of tyranny. A free society requires a transparent state and private citizens. The UK has completely inverted it. Your private thoughts, messages, and photos are treated as state property, while the parasites have declared their own devices sacred, unmonitored, and completely opaque.

They know exactly how dangerous this technology is - which is precisely why they wrote themselves out of it.

📱 Step 1: The Secret Tunnel (The State VPN)
When an MP, Minister, or elite civil servant works from home, they do not use standard family Wi-Fi. Their government laptops and phones are hard-coded to connect to a secure Government VPN (Virtual Private Network).

🔒 Step 2: The Legal Loophole Activates
The second that VPN clicks on, every single text, photo, and WhatsApp message they send is sucked out of their house and routed through private servers owned by Parliament. Because their data is now flowing through a "public body network," it triggers Schedule 1 of the Online Safety Act.

🕵️‍♂️ Step 3: Complete Invisibility
By law, this private state network is 100% exempt from the screening and scanning algorithms forced onto the public. Their devices instantly become legally invisible and untouchable to the state dragnet.

💥 The Naked Truth
Your Home: Your personal Wi-Fi pushes your private messages into a public commercial pipeline where the government demands it be scanned and screened.

Their Home: Their Wi-Fi instantly flips into a secure, state-shielded fortress.

Location does not matter. The ruling class built a private internet for themselves, using a legal and technical bypass to completely dodge the digital panopticon they are forcing onto you.

FYI: From 2020, when Civil Servants and MP’s worked from home, the Parliamentary Digital Service (PDS) mass-distributed pre-configured laptops, secure mobile devices, and hardware to the home addresses of every MP, Peer, and civil servant. They did not need to install private physical servers in individual houses because the devices themselves act as portable endpoints for the state's centralised servers… then, Government IT teams rapidly re-engineered their servers to handle the strain, massive scaling their corporate VPN capability. This allowed every single person in the state machine to plug their official laptop into their home Wi-Fi, click a button, and completely tunnel their traffic back into secure, centralized government servers.

So, what shall we do folks!?

New MNC (link in bio) campaign to begin VERY soon! But ideas welcome.

[Christophe Dorigné-Thomson @thomsonchris]

Riding Whoosh highspeed train between Jakarta & Bandung built by China with Indonesia in 7 years for $7bn for 132km, reaching 350km/hour. The English colonial state can't build HS2 in already 17 years, will need over 30 years, over $130bn & steals billions from Scotland for it. As an English colony, Scotland's potential is completely squandered and its wealth plundered. With its liberation, Scotland can build an amazing high-speed rail system connecting all of Scotland. There is no future for Scotland as an English colony.

[LGB Alliance @AllianceLGB]

Our CEO, Kate Barker, calls for organisations and institutions to explain who the '+' people are, why they support them and what they have to do with LGB people.

https://t.co/RUZ5gPRyFh

[Amy E. Sousa, MA Depth Psychology @KnownHeretic]

Good men don’t threaten women. (Even as a joke.)

[Jack Middleton @jackmiddleton95]

WESTMINSTER COST SCOTLAND A £1 TRILLION OIL FUND