@haxrob@ImposeCost Re: chopper. I’d argue it still fits the mold. The dev and deploy costs are essentially zero at this point, so it doesn’t matter from their perspective if caught
@0xAlexei I wanted to use what I now use as a twitter icon (purchased use rights on it just for that reason) with a lead title of “0wn3d” but publisher suggested it could hurt sales, esp for anyone not familiar with 1337.
One thing that @networkattack points out is that anything that can be done by authorised users can be done by hackers abusing authorised users’ access.
@WylieNewmark@BuchananBen@RidT Same reaction as @BuchananBen. Thank you. And honored to be included in the company. All three try to look beyond the specific tech of the moment.
In the series of “books I wish I’d read sooner” is @networkattack’s
Network Attacks and Exploitation: A Framework. I really appreciate the solid examples and the focus on humanity throughout. https://t.co/qZ00Ej4ghD
@runasand@RossleRed I reasoned that if someone were going to steal a car, they would steal a better car than mine... The “better car” theory of security breaks down when attacks can be automated and there is a potential positional use for every point of access.2/2
I appreciate you quoting this @runasand. I first wrote it in 2014. As time passes, the idea seems to keep moving away from true in theory towards true in practice.
“The ‘better car’ theory of security breaks down when attacks can be automated and there is a potential positional use for every point of access.” — @networkattack
@runasand@RossleRed Context: [C]ompanies do not believe they will be targeted because they are uninteresting... I used exactly this thought process for deciding never to bother locking the doors of my first car, a machine held together by coat hangers, duct tape...1/2