Network Law Review

A review dedicate to the complex science of markets & digital laws.

[Network Law Review @NetworkLawRev]

📚 Our Editor-in-Chief @ProfSchrepel shares his May reading suggestions: rugged landscapes & competition policy, populist antitrust’s error costs, the data-center water debate, EU AI-compute sovereignty, blockchain governance & more.
https://t.co/fFth0tchbQ

[Network Law Review @NetworkLawRev]

What if the most important innovations of the next decade aren’t in technology, but in institutions themselves?

@profjasonpotts thinks they are. Come and listen to his provocative talk on i/acc.

Live talk + Q&A with @profSchrepel 👇
https://t.co/cRiurUyovl

[Network Law Review @NetworkLawRev]

Firms innovate not along a smooth path but on “rugged technological landscapes”, balancing risky frontier breakthroughs against niche innovation. This has implications for competition policy, as argued by Professors Callander, Lambert, and Matouschek. https://t.co/EZEun4SbUg

[Network Law Review @NetworkLawRev]

Looking for a reliable way to track antitrust case law across jurisdictions?

The Network Law Review runs dedicated series covering the U.S., Europe, and Latin America. No equivalent resource brings this together in one place.

Subscribe ➝ https://t.co/OjOoUjo4Bw (it's free)

[Network Law Review @NetworkLawRev]

Catch up on Latin American antitrust news in the new Chronicles: digital markets regulation, Apple’s iOS settlement, and institutional reform in Argentina and Mexico, written by Carlos Ragazzo, @aboutmattiuzzo, Bruna Cataldo, and Clara Duarte Late https://t.co/dpAuDZzOz6

[Network Law Review @NetworkLawRev]

📚 April 2026 reading suggestions are out.

AI agents meet complexity economics. The waterbed effect collapses. The AI moat wobbles. Europe drifts into American dependence. Hayek’s papers go online. Barabási on networks.

By @ProfSchrepel 👇
https://t.co/pKDOm1dxX4.

[Koren W. Wong-Ervin @kwongervin]

New issue of @NetworkLawRev “Antitrust Antidote,” covering decisions from Q1 2026 https://t.co/OfaQp8uT2y

[Network Law Review @NetworkLawRev]

Three months of US Antitrust news in the new Antitrust Antidote: refusal to deal, innovation harm in pipeline mergers, and antitrust standing, written by @kwongervin, Jeremy Kauffman, Jeremy Sandford, and Nathan Wilson https://t.co/Q4rXA4jA43

[Network Law Review @NetworkLawRev]

✨New series✨
We introduce "Pott's of Arabia" wherein @profjasonpotts examines institutional market reforms toward innovation and competition in Saudi Arabia. First piece: a shift toward a dynamic competition paradigm. https://t.co/CmNwZT7x2n

[Network Law Review @NetworkLawRev]

New issue of Competition Stories is out, open access, as always.
This one covers: parallel investigations in digital markets, tying doctrine under pressure, Android Auto ruling, the €2.95B Google AdTech fine...
EU competition law moves fast. We track it.
https://t.co/kBFeCthZtO

[Network Law Review @NetworkLawRev]

Catch up on EU competition law with the new Stories by Mario Siragusa & Alice Setari from @ClearyGottlieb, covering parallel investigations by the Commission and NCAs, tensions in abuse doctrines and digital market realities and more! https://t.co/btk6YfcfFF

[Network Law Review @NetworkLawRev]

Here are @ProfSchrepel monthly reading suggestions. Topics include AI's reshaping of research and publishing, the economics of AI talent in universities, using AI to audit EU regulation, economic growth and the rise of large firms, and more... https://t.co/2JOUihxj54

[Network Law Review @NetworkLawRev]

Where else can you read Hovenkamp on monopoly power, Acemoglu on taxing digital ads, case-law analysis, and curated monthly readings designed to keep you up to date without the noise?
Subscribe ➝ https://t.co/ZPPPPbt7h1 (it's free!)

[Network Law Review @NetworkLawRev]

Is antitrust law about fairness? Herbert Hovenkamp’s answer is clear: no, and it never was.
In this new piece, @Sherman1890 dismantles the growing assumption in competition debates that antitrust should correct inequality or redistribute economic power
👉 https://t.co/SaGLwvIgdn.

[Network Law Review @NetworkLawRev]

New on @NetworkLawRev:
Generative AI is increasing academic output.
But when attention is scarce, output does not equal influence. The Matthew effect intensifies. Stratification follows https://t.co/6LwHLyqwgP

[Network Law Review @NetworkLawRev]

Here are Thibault Schrepel’s monthly reading suggestions.
https://t.co/JEtoUS3FHi

Topics include the constitutional limits of the Digital Markets Act, antitrust’s fixation on structural remedies, AI’s productivity impact on firms, generative AI in literature reviews and more!

[Network Law Review @NetworkLawRev]

🚨 Just out: The world’s most downloaded antitrust articles of 2025 on SSRN 🚨 https://t.co/U7AgGWiVf8

[Network Law Review @NetworkLawRev]

🚨 Just out: The world’s most downloaded antitrust articles of 2025 on SSRN 🚨 https://t.co/U7AgGWiVf8

[Network Law Review @NetworkLawRev]

Looking for a Christmas read and interested in the recent FTC v. Meta ruling and more? The latest Antitrust Antidote by @kwongervin, Jeremy Sandford, and Nathan Wilson highlights unmissable antitrust news from Oct-Dec. Happy reading, happy holidays!✨ https://t.co/ApvQRuHijZ

[Network Law Review @NetworkLawRev]

Can a market really have two monopolists?
@Sherman1890 argues no, and explains why courts’ “direct” measures of market power clash with the historic and economic meaning of monopoly. Market share, dominance, and why >50% still matters. Read it here https://t.co/q5xrbFQZSk