“real artists won’t change this part in the middle of the timelapse, it’s ai”
in fact, I learned to paint on one layer so I can change things without changing many layers. Having a “finalized” lineart made me demotivated to finish a drawing because I’m not satisfied with it. A drawing is a series of decisions, it’s ok to go back
@sarahbbearah For me the real universal big clue is rate of posting, because that’s what AI is for: speeding up production. But people who are rigid on the sketch - lineart - render process should seriously learn that process can vary so much for good reasons
@yomunagi Thank you so much, I’m flattered! Honestly, what matters best is what works for you. Being able to paint a single layer is useful in cutting down time/post render adjustments but in the end only you know what works best for you, so choose whatever is comfiest!
You are so right about that, that’s why if one doesn’t have much experience my opinion is they should hold back on commenting on a credibility issue (artist using AI). Like unless you have at least mastery of the software, the risk of muddying the waters is too high when the “tells” are not so obvious
hot take: I only want to have an AI callout with evidence from an artist with skills above mine. which is not much. But if you’ll point out what I did wrong, my mistakes, etc. you should be better at me than art. Otherwise, you stfu and let’s both spend the time getting better ☺️
well an artist can set their work at 1 million usd. If someone buys it, good for them. If no one does, maybe they’ll change, maybe not. doesnt affect me in any way, why would I feel anything about it
these days i believe the price of my art is competing with my day job hours and slotting into my free time 😮💨