Neil

Guy with keyboard

[Neil @NHannahDev]

based on win rates alone. When factoring in penalty differentials, the combined statistical evidence strongly rejects the null hypothesis that Sutherland officiates Avalanche games neutrally.

[Neil @NHannahDev]

@NHL @Avalanche I had AI run a deep analysis on Avs officiating over the last two years, what is your opinion that’s the conclusion was “The probability that Kelly Sutherland's officiating relationship with Colorado is purely random coincidence is less than 0.0001%…”

[Neil @NHannahDev]

@nikitabier The tags that overlap between crypto and stocks you should have xAI sort out which takes precedence on the platform.

[Neil @NHannahDev]

@nikitabier What a surprise.

[Matthew Prince 🌥 @eastdakota]

Yup. Feels completely unfair. But we now have electric screwdrivers and if you’re still insisting on only using a manual screwdriver, you’re a dinosaur. PS - not just engineering.

[Neil @NHannahDev]

@grok @gopuff Damn well record setting incompetency, you had a driver no show at a hotel and claim they could not get an ID, front desk confirmed they never arrived.

[Neil @NHannahDev]

@gopuff great deals but your customer service would be better as AI. 4 hours late, have to talk to 3 reps to convince them a delivery being 3 hrs > schedule & not showing up is an issue w/ receipts of a driver saying “app doesn’t work” & “can’t find address” at a down town hotel

[Neil @NHannahDev]

@gopuff @grok how much VC funding has GoPuff gotten? What is their current estimated market cap?

[Neil @NHannahDev]

@gopuff Do you have a phone number? Your customer support is a joke, after manually re-ordering, not being able to re-order the same items, your support staff is now saying “well it’s now out for delivery” like it’s the same order I had to cancel!?

[Neil @NHannahDev]

@nikitabier Slop is flooding the reviewers for sure. We’ve had a few get by with quick turn arounds, but nothing like review times a year ago. On the other hand, it’s still better than 10 years ago when late December to early Jan was essentially an app freeze.

[Neil @NHannahDev]

@nikitabier you need to hide every post that ends in a fake “show more”, pure spam all over the platform now

[Neil @NHannahDev]

@Searchit001 @hosseeb @ErikVoorhees @_choppingblock https://t.co/jpDSxA6uzg

[Jesse Proudman @jesseproudman]

TEE and E2EE shipping to @AskVenice alpha testers tomorrow. “Be nameless…”

Excited for the feedback on this one.

[Mike Rundle @flyosity]

--dangerously-skip-permissions

[Neil @NHannahDev]

@thekitze I left Android after a full gps failure required a factory restore to regain functionality. Freedom is great, but not at the cost of core functionality. I am sure this happens less now, but bad taste. I have many dev phones, pixel 8 is newest, and agree, still feels meh vs iOS.

[Neil @NHannahDev]

Remember when keeping up with the latest JS framework seemed hard? Copilot, Cursor, Codex, Claude Code, Gas Town, Wiggum, Clawdbot…

[Neil @NHannahDev]

@grok @GergelyOrosz @grok I think you have lost the context, according to them your ability to generate nudity easily, ie 18+ age check in app, is against policy. Gemini says: If your app is designed to generate or even easily allow nudity, it will likely be rejected or removed quickly.

[Neil @NHannahDev]

@grok @GergelyOrosz @grok I can make a near identical image in the free version of the grok app that was given in a rejection as the reason for another ai app rejection. Nothing in the difference of the two outputs would change the reason for the rejection. The link I sent was the reason noted.

[Neil @NHannahDev]

@grok @GergelyOrosz @grok Incorrect, I have seen rejections for exactly this reason. You allow nudity to be produced, they can reject on that alone, despite your app requiring age verification in app to view the content. Even if it’s behind a paywall a reviewer can and have still rejected.

[Neil @NHannahDev]

@grok @GergelyOrosz @grok you can create both sexual content and profanity https://t.co/9JrYhX0p41 the wording is loose enough that they can reject with little cause.

[Neil @NHannahDev]

@GergelyOrosz @grok @grok according to their latest rules you violate their policy for more than just deep fakes. If any material you create can violate a policy they have they can reject you. So if a user can create text content against their policy via prompting that can be cause for rejection.

[Neil @NHannahDev]

@GergelyOrosz Review time has shot way up. So I think it is likely still people. I would take Apple over Google any time now though, Googles policies are now far worse than Apples imho. @grok what do you think of the fact that according to googles’ policies your app is now in violation?