@grok@SoumyaPand32003@enesovat22@elonmusk He inspired people to fight and kill, so you’re saying it's okay for a god to cause the deaths of 4 million people. So, if Muhammad were ordered by Allah to kill 4 million people, what would your reaction be?
@grok@SoumyaPand32003@enesovat22@elonmusk Okay, Allah also advised people to be peaceful and told Muhammad to be peaceful, but they did not accept peace, so he was ordered by Allah for fight that lead 4 million dead, just like Krishna. So why do you see Muhammad as wrong but Krishna as not wrong?
@grok@SoumyaPand32003@enesovat22@elonmusk Okay, so you agree that it’s a myth. But I'm talking about reality. If the story were real and, as it says, 4 million people were killed, would you worship Krishna or order his arrest?
@grok@SoumyaPand32003@enesovat22@elonmusk When we can't prove the story historically, and it involves 4 million deaths allegedly caused by Krishna, if you were a court judge, would you worship Krishna for what he did or would you order His arrest warrant?
@grok@SoumyaPand32003@enesovat22@elonmusk So, if it's just a story, what the hell is the story here on Earth for? If we cannot teach our children a story related to god, who is supposed to be the source of morality, then who will teach them morality if god himself doesn’t know morality?
@grok@SoumyaPand32003@enesovat22@elonmusk So, are you advising people to teach their children that Krishna inspired people to kill 4 million people and it's not historically proved either? Is this acceptable in the 21st century? Should I teach this to my child?
@grok@SoumyaPand32003@enesovat22@elonmusk we started our conversation with the question of whether you believe it happened. Now you're saying there is no historical evidence that's what made it's a myth and myth should not be thought to children
@grok@SoumyaPand32003@enesovat22@elonmusk When there is no evidence that such a war actually happened, why are you trying to justify a story that is not historically proven to be real?
@grok@SoumyaPand32003@enesovat22@elonmusk Krishna is a god. You cannot use 21st-century standards to justify what he did thousands of years ago. Because he is god he knows right and wrong, regardless of the century. He also know the past and the future.
@grok@SoumyaPand32003@enesovat22@elonmusk You're repeating the same thing to avoid answering my question. As I said, okey the story is an epic, but that doesn't mean the deaths didn't happen. The book says that 1.66 billion people died, yet you're saying 4 million. So, okay, 4 million people died because of Krishna.
@grok@SoumyaPand32003@enesovat22@elonmusk Krishna inspired people to fight, which led to 4 million deaths. You're justifying the deaths of 4 million people instead of considering Krishna a genocidal god.
@grok@SoumyaPand32003@enesovat22@elonmusk That’s because your prompt was set up that way. You need to tag Elon to change your prompt because your prompt is set up to justify everyone’s religion as correct. You don't n’t have personal data, but you collect data from X and other places.
I can setup similar AI
@grok@SoumyaPand32003@enesovat22@elonmusk Okay, Krishna inspired people to fight. In the same way, Hitler inspired people to fight against those he considered demons.
If Krishna isn't considered a criminal for inspiring people to fight, then Hitler shouldn't be considered one either.
@grok@SoumyaPand32003@enesovat22@elonmusk Okay, now, if the number of people who died was 4 million, would you consider Krishna a good person for taking human form and inspiring people to fight and kill 4 million people, while Hitler is considered a criminal for killing 6 million?