Nick Ouellette

[Michael Saylor @saylor]

With CLARITY stalled, I expect the SEC, CFTC, and Treasury to advance rules under existing law, banks to expand Bitcoin custody and loans against it, and more capital to favor Bitcoin and digital credit. GENIUS supports stablecoin adoption. Progress need not wait for Congress.

[Karl Mehta @karlmehta]

3/ The Shocking District Breakdown

Out of 94 total federal districts in America, just 5 liberal districts issued 35 of the 40 nationwide injunctions blocking Trump's agenda.

Five districts were controlling policy for 330 million Americans.

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Who is confirming that gold wasn’t stolen from Fort Knox?

Maybe it’s there, maybe it’s not.

That gold is owned by the American public! We want to know if it’s still there.

[Joe Rogan @joerogan]

Since there's an issue with searching for this episode on YouTube here is the full podcast with Trump

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

My involvement in politics is not because I wish to be, but because I believe the future of the free world is at stake

[Nick Ouellette @nickouellette1]

@guimarin T-Bills, probably

So the US Treasury has the $$$

It’s generally not just cash sitting in a corporates bank account

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

The Blindsight device from Neuralink will enable even those who have lost both eyes and their optic nerve to see.

Provided the visual cortex is intact, it will even enable those who have been blind from birth to see for the first time.

To set expectations correctly, the vision will be at first be low resolution, like Atari graphics, but eventually it has the potential be better than natural vision and enable you to see in infrared, ultraviolet or even radar wavelengths, like Geordi La Forge.

Much appreciated, @US_FDA!

[JD Vance @JDVance]

Yesterday, Donald J. Trump nearly lost his life. An armed gunman waited for him in the bushes. He brought a go-pro camera to record it. A secret service agent spotted the barrel of a gun through a fence and shot at the gunman. The gunman fled. He was caught. And now we slowly learn about him and his motive.

President Trump is my running mate, and my friend, but he is more importantly a father and grandfather to people who love him very much. I want him to have many more years with his family. (And selfishly, I'd like many more with my own.)

I admire the president for calling for peace and calm. The rhetoric is out of control. It nearly got Steve Scalise and many others killed a few years ago. It nearly got Donald Trump killed twice. But I want to say something about yesterday's news, and how it illuminates the difference between vigorous debate and violent rhetoric.

Here is what we know so far: Kamala Harris has said that "Democracy is on the line" in her race against President Trump. The gunman agreed, and used the exact same phrase. He had a Kamala Harris bumper sticker on his truck. He was obsessed with Ukraine's "fight for Democracy" and absorbed many unhinged views about the Russia-Ukraine war. HIs name is Ryan Routh, and he donated 19 times to Democrat causes and zero to Republican ones.

How do you think the Democrats and their media allies would respond if a 19-time Republican donor tried to kill a Democratic official? It's a question that answers itself. For years, Kamala Harris's campaign surrogates have said things like "Trump has to be eliminated." And how have their media allies responded to the second assassination attempt on Donald Trump in as many months?

NBC News called the attempted assassination a "golf club incident." The LA Times told us "Trump Targeted at Golf Club." The USA Today's top of the fold headline is "Hope in America," and they published a preposterous letter to the editor arguing that Trump "brings these assassination attempts on himself." CNN's Dana Bash--who just yesterday bizarrely accused me of inciting a bomb threat--said today that Harris campaign rhetoric didn't motivate Routh even though he echoed their rhetoric explicitly.

PBS's weekend show perfectly illustrates the double standard of Kamala Harris's media friends. After spending 30 seconds on the second assassination attempt on President Trump, they then focused on the real danger: me and President Trump, who are, according to them, personally responsible for bomb threats against Springfield. Of course, I repeatedly condemend those threats. And reports today suggest they came from a foreign country, not--as the media suggested--a deranged Trump fan.

The double standard is breathtaking. Donald Trump and I are, by their account, directly responsible for bomb threats from foreign countries. Why? Because we had the audacity to repeat what residents told us about the problems in their town. Meanwhile, Harris allies call for Trump to be eliminated as the media publishes arguments that he deserved to be shot.

This seems like a double standard. But at a deep level, it is entirely consistent.

Consider Springfield. Citizens are telling us that there are problems. These include the undeniable truths of higher car accidents, unaffordable housing, evictions of residents, overcrowded hospitals, overstressed schools, and rising rates of disease. They also include the infamous pet stories--which, again, multiple people have spoken about (either on video or to me or my staff).

Kamala Harris's first strategy was to ignore these people and their concerns. Yes, she had prevented the deportation of millions of illegal aliens, and some of them made their way to Springfield. But it was a small town with no voice. Some of the local leadership even loved the cheap labor. So the suffering of thousands of American citizens went ignored.

Their next move with these stories is censorship. In Springfield, a psychopath (or a foreign government) calls in a bomb threat, so they blame that on President Trump (and me). The threat of violence is disgraceful of course, yet the media seems to relish it. They cover a bomb threat, but not the rise in murders. They cover the threat, but not the HIV uptick. They cover the threat, not the schools overwhelmed with new kids who don't speak English. They cover the threat, not rising insurance rates or the car accidents that caused them. They cover the threat, not the failures of Kamala Harris's leadership.

The purpose is not to turn down the rhetoric. If anything, covering the bomb threats gives whoever makes them exactly what he wants: attention. The purpose is distraction and shame. How dare you talk about the problems of Haitian migration in Springfield? You're endangering people, simply by discussing the problems of Kamala Harris's policies. It's a form of moral blackmail, designed not to make anyone safe but to shut everyone up.

Springfield is the most recent, but hardly the most egregious example. There was the Hunter Biden laptop story, censored by BigTech. And who can forget that anyone who didn't support Kamala Harris's Ukraine policy was drenched in the blood of Ukrainian children. That last one appears to have had some effect on Routh--the most recent would-be assassin. The message is always the same: don't you dare express an opinion on the public affairs of your nation. The message is: shut up.

This is the difference between debate--even aggressive debate--and censorship. It is one thing to attack Kamala Harris for "destroying the country" and quite another to say that President Trump should be "eliminated." It is one thing to criticize overheated rhetoric, and another to say that a former president has invited an assassination on himself. It is one thing to say that Donald J. Trump's arguments about the election of 2020 are wrong; it is another thing to attempt to remove him from the ballot over it.

It is one thing to say that pets are not, in fact being eaten, and another thing to say that anyone who disagrees is trying to murder people. Dissent, even vigorous dissent, is a great tradition of the United States. Censorship is not.

For the next 7 weeks of this campaign, I will vigorously defend your right to speak your mind. I believe you have every right to criticize me and Donald J. Trump, even if you say terrible or untrue things about us. But when I ask you to "tone down the rhetoric" it's not about being nice--our citizens have every right to be mean, even if I don't like it--or empty platitudes.

Instead, I'm asking all of us to reject censorship. Reject the idea that you can control what other people think and say. Embrace persuasion of your fellow citizens over silencing them--either through the powers of Big Tech or through moral blackmail.

I think this will make our public debate much better. But there's something else. Reject censorship and you reject political violence. Embrace censorship, and you will inevitably embrace violence on its behalf.

The reason is simple. The logic of censorship leads directly to one place, for there is only one way to permanently silence a human being: put a bullet in his brain.

[Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump]

FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT!!!!!
https://t.co/3KWOl2ibaW

[Nick Ouellette @nickouellette1]

And today @peacock app on Apple TV is freezing every 2 minutes

It’s unwatchable

[Nick Ouellette @nickouellette1]

@NBCSports I’ve been watching US Open featured groups for 45 mins and feel like I’ve barely seen any shots

[Nick Ouellette @nickouellette1]

Awesome thread

[Michael S. Kim @Mike_kim714]

Hole Breakdowns of 15, 3, 5, 11

Augusta National for the most part gives you plenty of room off the tee which provides different angles into the greens. As everyone knows, it’s a 2nd shot golf course and I’ll go into the greens in more detail

15 is first because its my favorite hole

[Nick Ouellette @nickouellette1]

@Daniel_Rapaport Of course he should take the drop since it’s allowed in the rules

But the rule should be changed

[Nick Ouellette @nickouellette1]

Absurd drop from Malnati on 16

They need to update that rule

[Nick Ouellette @nickouellette1]

@Daniel_Rapaport John Rahm

[Nick Ouellette @nickouellette1]

@joshlukenichols Walk the course routing IN ORDER at least once

You will gain an understanding of how the course topography flows together

As soon as you get home you will want to watch all the old notable broadcasts with this new perspective

[Nick Ouellette @nickouellette1]

@flushingitgolf 78 (+8) without the blow-up hole is pretty good

Great learning experience

[Nick Ouellette @nickouellette1]

@Daniel_Rapaport Charlie’s knows what’s up @GreysonClothier @Titleist

[Nick Ouellette @nickouellette1]

Yes exactly

So how did they “catch” Jordan for writing down a 3 instead of a 4?

And if they did “catch” him, then why not fix it before the incorrect score submission becomes final, since he clearly wasn’t trying to cheat

It makes no sense to “catch” a player after so it results in a DQ, particularly one that had all his holes televised

[Nick Ouellette @nickouellette1]

@Brynjo @itismarkharris @Daniel_Rapaport If the walking scorers and other methods aren’t accurate then how do they verify that the players are signing a correct vs incorrect score…

[Nick Ouellette @nickouellette1]

@FrankieBorrelli TLDR high 70s

The general rule of thumb is you will average about 3 strokes higher than your course handicap (for a given set of tees)

At my course there is a ~6 stroke difference for me between the back-ish normal men’s tees and the most fwd men’s tees

[Lou Stagner (Golf Stat Pro) @LouStagner]

Being a scratch player does NOT mean you average even par.

A good rule of thumb is that over your last 20 rounds, your scoring average will be about three shots higher than your COURSE handicap.

This rule of thumb applies to ALL skill levels.

If your COURSE handicap is 10 and it's a par 72?
You will average about 85.

If your COURSE handicap is 4 and it's a par 71?
You will average about 78.

Course handicap is DIFFERENT than your handicap index.

Your handicap index is used to calculate your course handicap (e.g., you will get less strokes on an easy course and more strokes on a hard course).

With a handicap Index of 5.0, a course rating of 74.0, a slope rating of 139 and par of 72, your COURSE handicap will be 8.

With a handicap Index of 5.0, a course rating of 71.0, a slope rating of 125 and par of 72, your COURSE handicap will be 5.