@adamyounggolf I agree that an open face alone won’t move a center strike to the hosel. In real swings variables don’t change independently. Open faces will create compensations that alter handle location/path/strike location. So while face angle may not directly cause the shank, can be causal.
@ryanmouquegolf@Top100Rick Most of my responses are OnForm video reviews. That’s not AI. It just helps me organize when someone emails me, sends them to my booking calendar, tells them I’ll get back to them in person by the end of the day because I teach all day. That type of stuff I see as useful.
Is there a future where instead of golf teachers, we use AI to coach us?
Bryson was struggling. Couldn’t find it in the dirt. He then used AI to diagnose his swing and fired a 65!
In theory, AI should diagnose swing faults with precision, correct?
Another example of “don’t listen to every post on social about golf” let us have a look at Nellys real swing and see what happens….
Ya super bowed wrist at the top. Pause. NOOOOOOOT.
@ryanmouquegolf@Top100Rick I’d argue Ai saves me a ton of time on the back end, so I can be a more focused not burnt out version of myself. Pros and cons. It still scares the poop out of me.
@BigSwingTempo Dynamic loft can’t really be estimated from face/path alone. You’d need AoA, launch, spin, strike location, etc.
But 25°+ delivered loft on a 5W at 101 mph would likely launch/spin higher than this.
1.46 smash with a slightly (-) AoA usually points more toward efcnt spin loft
@BigSwingTempo@brianmanzella Roughly 75–85% of a shot’s start direction is dictated by clubface, so face-to-path control is usually priority #1 for me.
Grip changes are often the easiest way to influence face delivery, and can naturally clean up path as a secondary effect. Path-specific work comes next.