AnyeI

Self-love practitioner. ❤️🤎🧡💛🤍💚💙💜

[AnyeI @nielissimo]

@imnvincible omg, you're there already.

[AnyeI @nielissimo]

Hindi kaya ganito yung mga napagkakamalang sigbin?

[Anxious Vids🔥 @Anxiousvids]

Así como este mapache con "Síndrome de la Columna Corta" (Short Spine Syndrome - SSS), esta rara condición también aparece en otros animales 😨😨..

[Atom 💙❤️ @Ralphified]

@MacuNars I am not sure if may kinalaman ito pero yun suspek na yan ay galing na pala sa kulungan.

[Jay Tarriela @jaytaryela]

This is outright racism and an open mockery of international law — portraying the Philippines as a monkey and dismissing the Arbitral Award as nothing more than a script written by the US and Japan. https://t.co/zXZ8MptzIu

[Jay Tarriela @jaytaryela]

Ang video na ito ay gawa ng China Daily — ang state-controlled media ng China.

Hindi ba’t nakakagalit na ang mismong bansang gumigipit sa ating mga karapatan sa West Philippine Sea ang siya pang may lakas ng loob na gumawa ng video na naglalarawan sa mga Pilipino bilang mga unggoy na basta na lamang sumusunod sa Japan at Estados Unidos?

Isang caricature lang ay iniyakan na nila — nagfile pa ng diplomatic protest dahil binastos ko raw ang kanilang lider. Ngunit dito, sa video na ito na mahigit isang minuto, ang binabastos at minamaliit ay ang ating pagka-PILIPINO mismo!

Naaalala ko tuloy ang ilang senador na nagsabing kailangan ko raw humingi ng tawad sa China. Ngayon kaya, sasabihin din ba nilang ang China naman ang dapat humingi ng tawad — dahil tayong mga Pilipino mismo ang binababoy ng video na ito?

Mga kababayang Pilipino hindi po tayo UNGGOY, at huwag tayong pumayag na gawing UNGGOY! Ang mga hayop lamang ang mga nakakagawa ng ganitong pagturing sa kapwa tao at mas masahol pa sa hayop ang hindi marunong sumunod sa international law!

[AnyeI @nielissimo]

@shade_of_tee I had pompoms at 50 cents. 😭

[AnyeI @nielissimo]

@yourcupoftino ang pogi ni marvin. 😍

[AnyeI @nielissimo]

@akobaloy crusheeee

[TEODORO MEZO #DDSMentalIlness @LTeomezorrat]

#Sara2028 🤭🐸🐸🐸🐸🐊🐊🐊🐊

[Dalagang Pilipina 🇵🇭 @fierceLady08]

Ito ang video na ayaw ipakita ng prosecution kahapon at hindi mabangit- bangit ni Ligutan, pakinggan ang sinabi ni VP Sara: "if Kapag pinatay ako..." .

LOUD AND CLEAR!!!

[ella @ellaelen01]

Ang tawa kek ayaw ng defense i-play yung 2-minute video ni Sara Duterte na nagmumura😭😭

#ConvictSara

[AnyeI @nielissimo]

@igopdongaj kyot 😍

[GentriSenyo 🌊☀️🏝️ @GentriSenyo]

Tortured, stabbed, faces burned and nilagyan ng bato ang katawan para hindi lumutang - they did these INSIDE an INC Chapel. Taenaaaa ang hayop. Demonyo yung gumawa

[AltIndayBadiday @AltIndayBadiday]

The Final Word

[Coco @_dacoconutnut]

'GUSTO MONG MAMATAY?'

Kawawang rider hinarang ng mga nag-rally na taga-INC tapos ninakaw yung susi ng motor niya. Nung nagreklamo siya, pinagmumura pa tapos pinagbantaan na papatayin.

Ganito ba talaga kayo, mga kapatid? May rumespondeng pulis pero wala ring nagawa. Mga perwisyo kayo sa Pilipinas.

[Claudiopoi @claudiopoy]

And please stop with this hypocrisy about justice when no one’s forgetting that in 2025, a comedian was murdered just for joking about your kulto.

The shamelessness knows no bounds.

[MajorCrush @CrushMajor]

"Hindi ito usapin kung may karapatan bang mag-rally ang INC. Meron. May freedom of speech. May freedom of assembly. May religious freedom. Hindi ito debate club na kapag hindi mo gusto ang mensahe, buburahin mo na ang karapatan.

Pero may karapatan din ang nurse na pumasok sa duty. May karapatan ang empleyadong hindi ma-late. May karapatan ang commuter na makauwi nang hindi ginagawang extra sa political teleserye ng may kaso. The Constitution protects peaceful assembly, but it does not automatically convert EDSA into a private prayer room, campaign venue, or loyalty checkpoint.

Religious freedom protects belief. It protects worship. It protects the right to speak, gather, and petition the government. Pero hindi siya magic pass para gawing sacrament ang traffic jam. Ang perwisyo ay perwisyo pa rin, kahit may dasal, tarpaulin, at bloc voting sa background.

Under BP 880, kapag public assembly sa public place tulad ng kalsada, highway, plaza, o iba pang public space, kailangan ng written permit, maliban sa recognized exceptions. Hindi ito obscure legal trivia; basic public order ito. At hindi rin ito censorship. Permit and coordination are not there to silence speech. They are there so one group’s freedom does not swallow everyone else’s day.

Kasi kapag kalsada ang ginamit mo, hindi lang gobyerno ang kinakausap mo. Dinadamay mo ang pasahero, driver, nurse, janitor, call center agent, estudyante, delivery rider, pasyente, at empleyadong may biometrics na walang pakialam sa legal strategy ng kahit sinong politiko. Kaya ang tanong dito hindi, “Bakit bawal silang magsalita?”

Ang tanong: bakit ginawang collateral damage ang commuters sa defense strategy ng isang politiko?

Lalo na kung authentic ang mga kumakalat na text blasts, lumalabas na hindi ito simpleng spontaneous expression. “Surprise rally,” sabi sa mensahe. “Walang magpo-post sa social media.” Kapag sinadya mong itago sa publiko ang plano mong okupahin ang pangunahing kalsada nila sa oras ng rush hour, hindi lang ito exercise of expression. Para kang nag-ambush ng working class, tapos ang excuse mo ay constitutional rights.

At para saan ang “emergency” na ito? Hindi para sa kalamidad. Hindi para sa presyo ng bigas. Hindi para sa sahod. Hindi para sa ospital. Para ito sa kaso ni Rep. Marcoleta, na umiikot sa allegation tungkol sa ₱75 million in campaign donations or gifts allegedly received in three separate transactions, an amount above the ₱50 million threshold associated with plunder under Philippine law.

Malinaw: allegation pa lang ito. May presumption of innocence. May karapatan siyang sumagot. May karapatan siyang magdepensa sa tamang forum. Pero iba ang “ipagtanggol sa korte” sa “iparamdam sa estado na marami kami, kaya mag-ingat kayo.”

Kasi ang hustisya, hindi paramihan ng attendance. Kung sino ang may pinakamalaking crowd, hindi siya ang may hawak ng due process. Kung ganyan ang batas, magsara na ang mga korte at magpa-registration na lang sa Philippine Arena. “Your Honor, may 80,000 kami sa venue, therefore acquitted.”

Kung selective justice ang reklamo, valid iyon kung ang demand ay kasuhan ang lahat ng may ebidensya. Tama iyon. Dapat walang sagrado, walang untouchable, walang VIP lane sa accountability. Pero kapag ang ibig sabihin ng selective justice ay “huwag galawin ang amin hangga’t hindi niyo nauuna ang iba,” hindi na iyon prinsipyo. That is exemption wearing perfume.

Accountability is not a buffet. Hindi puwedeng gutom ka sa hustisya kapag kalaban ang kakasuhan, pero biglang religious fasting kapag kakampi na ang nasa plato.

Sa huli, ang ordinaryong commuter ang nagbayad ng inconvenience. Hindi sila Ombudsman. Hindi sila prosecutor. Hindi sila complainant. Pero sila ang naipit, na-late, nawalan ng kita, napagalitan sa trabaho, at napilitang mag-adjust sa problemang hindi naman nila ginawa. Sa simpleng Tagalog: damay. Sa legal language: disproportionate burden on the public. Sa kalye: perwisyo.

At hindi porke religious group ang gumawa, automatic banal ang perwisyo. Ang traffic jam ay traffic jam. Hindi siya nagiging sacrament dahil may organisadong attendance. Hindi siya nagiging moral crusade dahil sabay-sabay ang dating. Hindi siya nagiging justice movement dahil malaki ang crowd.

The standard must be simple and applied to all: INC, DDS, Kakampink, leftist, pro-government, anti-government, labor group, student group, civic group, o fans club ng sinigang. Same rules. Permit. Coordination. Public safety plan. Clear route. Clear dispersal. Respect for commuters. Maximum tolerance from the state, yes. But maximum tolerance is not maximum entitlement.

Constitutionally, they have the right to speak. Politically, they have the right to support Marcoleta. Legally, Marcoleta has the right to defend himself. But no institution, however large, religious, political, or influential, has the democratic right to turn commuters into bargaining chips.

Kapag ang depensa sa plunder allegation ay nagsisimula sa planadong traffic jam, hindi hustisya ang pinapakita. Power ang pinapakita.

At sa isang republic, power should answer to law, not block the road until the law blinks."

- Nutribun Republic

[Jo March @jomsksk]

pinuksa ang kulto 😭

[DAVAOMIGRANT @nabunturanguy]

The CULT is testing the waters. They wanna find out if they can muster enough crowd to show a semblance of “people power.” Ang kaibahan lang sa people power ng aming generation in 1986 is that we were fighting a just cause - the end of a corrupt Marcos regime. Ang inyong reason for the “protest” ay ano? TO PREVENT THE FILING OF PLUNDER CASE AGAINST YOUR RABID DDS LEADER MARCOLETA? Very self-serving CULT objective!

[RMM 12.24 @whenRMMtrades]

So this number 09568152248 called me yesterday afternoon and tried to scam me. Told me I have expiring points from my PNB card @PNBph . I am already feeling it's a scam but I still entertained the call to ascertain and study the scam. Here are the giveaway signs where their modus gets loopy, stupid, and "cheap"

1. Female agent contacted me, told me I have expiring points -- I told them to just convert it to Mabuhay Miles but she said these points are different.

2. Passed me to her supervisor to further discuss -- ATTENTION SCAMMERS: THIS IS AN OLD TRICK FROM THE BOOK ALREADY. EVEN TRAFFIC ENFORCERS USE THIS.

3. Male supervisor spoke to me, told me PNB has this rewards point system -- I asked where is it as I don't see it in my paper statement. Told me some kind of indirect lie he cooked. Then, asked me about some details -- he actually knows my name, birthday, card expiry date. Even promised to increase my credit card limit.

4. When he was about to ask me for my credit card number, he wants me to finish the number -- I told him, you already know my number cause it's in your system. Told me my line has some static (I know he's already lying)

5. Then told me my rewards points can be converted to Sodexo GC or checque to be mailed to my address. This is where I think it got cheap -- sodexo over Mabuhay Miles??? I mean, I want sodexo too but come on, we're already talking PNB points. And PNB sending a checque when they can just credit cash to my CC?

6. Last (and the time I hanged up because it's downright BS and already a waste of time), the evil male supervisor asked me from 1-999th if I know when my card approved. I asked how will I know it -- he said, "Sir check the 3-digit number at the back of you card". This is when I dropped the call.

How can this post reach NTC so they can block and check the owner?

Also heads up @PNBph -- you might need to check internally on who is leaking client data