Nigel Thomas

[Nigel Thomas @nigelthomas]

None of the information posted or repeated on this account is known by its author to be false, nor intended to stir racial or any hatred of, nor cause psychological or physical harm to, any person or group of people (howsoever identified).

[John Olooney @OlooneyJohn]

I told you
I told you didnt i

[Mario Nawfal @MarioNawfal]

Joe Rogan: "No one's covering it"

Tulsi Gabbard dropped major allegations: U.S. taxpayer money funded gain-of-function research through EcoHealth Alliance and the Wuhan lab… the very thing Fauci denied.

This should be front-page news everywhere, but mainstream media is silent.

Taylor Sheridan: “Didn’t we all know that already?”

Rogan: “That’s only if you followed it closely. Millions of Americans who watch TV news still have no idea this happened.”

Why is this still buried?

@joerogan / Writer: Val

[Nigel Thomas @nigelthomas]

@catturd2 Yeah sure

[Toby Rogers @uTobian]

I cannot emphasize strongly enough how corrosive it is for society, to have people dying left and right from the Covid shots, yet there's no official acknowledgement from the federal government, the media, or the medical community that this is happening and that this is a crisis.

[Robert Jenrick @RobertJenrick]

Genius.

Bring back the guy who gave away our gold reserves to advise on ‘economic resilience’.

What could possibly go wrong.

[Nigel Thomas @nigelthomas]

@CNviolations The guy’s an idiot. Spoiling it for everyone else. They can’t afford promotions like that if people do that.

[أبو عمّار @MaajidNawaz]

BREAKING: MIDAZOLAM

Medical educationalist Dr John Campbell @Johnincarlisle highlights UK policy of “systemic euthanasia” using Midazolam while citing peer reviewed paper by Dr Wilson Sy

This comes only one day before the MIDAZOLAM INQUEST into Derek Dimmock’s death resumes at Southwark Coroner’s Court this Monday 9am.
(Link to full 30 minute is discussion below)

[David Kurten @davidkurten]

The FDA has now approved Ivermectin for 'Covid' - 5 years and 5,500,000,000 experimental injections too late.

[Fiona Rose Diamond @CoviLeaks]

To those of you who refused to comply - you are heroes. YOU resisted the most expensive, militarised propaganda operation in history. You were dragged through mud, mocked, marginalised, arrested & still didn’t bend. Billions will never know how it felt to stand against non-science, nonsense, tyranny wrapped in white coats & press briefings, amplified by a corrupt mainstream media whose only job was to pump fear like oxygen, until hysteria drowned reason.

Thank you. Love and Strength, always. Fiona x

[Nigel Thomas @nigelthomas]

@CartlandDavid What if I’m wrong about these things.

[Nigel Thomas @nigelthomas]

Brainwashing in action…

[Libs of TikTok @libsoftiktok]

Chuck Schumer, Elizabeth Warren, Cory Booker, Tim Kaine and Mark Kelly posted nearly identical videos—word for word—right before Trump’s speech.

[John Olooney @OlooneyJohn]

skynet

[Buitengebieden @buitengebieden]

He will never forget this.. 😊 https://t.co/W6Upqb2vcQ

[Nigel Thomas @nigelthomas]

👇👏

[JD Vance @JDVance]

Yesterday, Donald J. Trump nearly lost his life. An armed gunman waited for him in the bushes. He brought a go-pro camera to record it. A secret service agent spotted the barrel of a gun through a fence and shot at the gunman. The gunman fled. He was caught. And now we slowly learn about him and his motive.

President Trump is my running mate, and my friend, but he is more importantly a father and grandfather to people who love him very much. I want him to have many more years with his family. (And selfishly, I'd like many more with my own.)

I admire the president for calling for peace and calm. The rhetoric is out of control. It nearly got Steve Scalise and many others killed a few years ago. It nearly got Donald Trump killed twice. But I want to say something about yesterday's news, and how it illuminates the difference between vigorous debate and violent rhetoric.

Here is what we know so far: Kamala Harris has said that "Democracy is on the line" in her race against President Trump. The gunman agreed, and used the exact same phrase. He had a Kamala Harris bumper sticker on his truck. He was obsessed with Ukraine's "fight for Democracy" and absorbed many unhinged views about the Russia-Ukraine war. HIs name is Ryan Routh, and he donated 19 times to Democrat causes and zero to Republican ones.

How do you think the Democrats and their media allies would respond if a 19-time Republican donor tried to kill a Democratic official? It's a question that answers itself. For years, Kamala Harris's campaign surrogates have said things like "Trump has to be eliminated." And how have their media allies responded to the second assassination attempt on Donald Trump in as many months?

NBC News called the attempted assassination a "golf club incident." The LA Times told us "Trump Targeted at Golf Club." The USA Today's top of the fold headline is "Hope in America," and they published a preposterous letter to the editor arguing that Trump "brings these assassination attempts on himself." CNN's Dana Bash--who just yesterday bizarrely accused me of inciting a bomb threat--said today that Harris campaign rhetoric didn't motivate Routh even though he echoed their rhetoric explicitly.

PBS's weekend show perfectly illustrates the double standard of Kamala Harris's media friends. After spending 30 seconds on the second assassination attempt on President Trump, they then focused on the real danger: me and President Trump, who are, according to them, personally responsible for bomb threats against Springfield. Of course, I repeatedly condemend those threats. And reports today suggest they came from a foreign country, not--as the media suggested--a deranged Trump fan.

The double standard is breathtaking. Donald Trump and I are, by their account, directly responsible for bomb threats from foreign countries. Why? Because we had the audacity to repeat what residents told us about the problems in their town. Meanwhile, Harris allies call for Trump to be eliminated as the media publishes arguments that he deserved to be shot.

This seems like a double standard. But at a deep level, it is entirely consistent.

Consider Springfield. Citizens are telling us that there are problems. These include the undeniable truths of higher car accidents, unaffordable housing, evictions of residents, overcrowded hospitals, overstressed schools, and rising rates of disease. They also include the infamous pet stories--which, again, multiple people have spoken about (either on video or to me or my staff).

Kamala Harris's first strategy was to ignore these people and their concerns. Yes, she had prevented the deportation of millions of illegal aliens, and some of them made their way to Springfield. But it was a small town with no voice. Some of the local leadership even loved the cheap labor. So the suffering of thousands of American citizens went ignored.

Their next move with these stories is censorship. In Springfield, a psychopath (or a foreign government) calls in a bomb threat, so they blame that on President Trump (and me). The threat of violence is disgraceful of course, yet the media seems to relish it. They cover a bomb threat, but not the rise in murders. They cover the threat, but not the HIV uptick. They cover the threat, not the schools overwhelmed with new kids who don't speak English. They cover the threat, not rising insurance rates or the car accidents that caused them. They cover the threat, not the failures of Kamala Harris's leadership.

The purpose is not to turn down the rhetoric. If anything, covering the bomb threats gives whoever makes them exactly what he wants: attention. The purpose is distraction and shame. How dare you talk about the problems of Haitian migration in Springfield? You're endangering people, simply by discussing the problems of Kamala Harris's policies. It's a form of moral blackmail, designed not to make anyone safe but to shut everyone up.

Springfield is the most recent, but hardly the most egregious example. There was the Hunter Biden laptop story, censored by BigTech. And who can forget that anyone who didn't support Kamala Harris's Ukraine policy was drenched in the blood of Ukrainian children. That last one appears to have had some effect on Routh--the most recent would-be assassin. The message is always the same: don't you dare express an opinion on the public affairs of your nation. The message is: shut up.

This is the difference between debate--even aggressive debate--and censorship. It is one thing to attack Kamala Harris for "destroying the country" and quite another to say that President Trump should be "eliminated." It is one thing to criticize overheated rhetoric, and another to say that a former president has invited an assassination on himself. It is one thing to say that Donald J. Trump's arguments about the election of 2020 are wrong; it is another thing to attempt to remove him from the ballot over it.

It is one thing to say that pets are not, in fact being eaten, and another thing to say that anyone who disagrees is trying to murder people. Dissent, even vigorous dissent, is a great tradition of the United States. Censorship is not.

For the next 7 weeks of this campaign, I will vigorously defend your right to speak your mind. I believe you have every right to criticize me and Donald J. Trump, even if you say terrible or untrue things about us. But when I ask you to "tone down the rhetoric" it's not about being nice--our citizens have every right to be mean, even if I don't like it--or empty platitudes.

Instead, I'm asking all of us to reject censorship. Reject the idea that you can control what other people think and say. Embrace persuasion of your fellow citizens over silencing them--either through the powers of Big Tech or through moral blackmail.

I think this will make our public debate much better. But there's something else. Reject censorship and you reject political violence. Embrace censorship, and you will inevitably embrace violence on its behalf.

The reason is simple. The logic of censorship leads directly to one place, for there is only one way to permanently silence a human being: put a bullet in his brain.

[Bev Turner @beverleyturner]

Some people look disgusted at me when I say that I would much rather see #Trump in the white house than #harris...
But THIS is why.
100% THIS.
@RobertKennedyJr 👇

[“Sudden And Unexpected” @toobaffled]

It really is, isn’t it?

[Wall Street Mav @WallStreetMav]

🤨🤨🤨

[Susan Hall AM @Councillorsuzie]

Sorry Angela, what was that…..

[The White Rabbit Podcast @AllBiteNoBark88]

BREAKING:
Everyone gets to the Truth eventually. Being open to it is step one. You were lied to.
So now what?
Vote them in again?
Believe them again?
Don't be so foolish.
The next mistake could be your last.
https://t.co/1qv1sHuuld

[Catturd ™ @catturd2]

We “conspiracy theorists” are undefeated.