@ShashiTharoor A malayali is first of all, proud of being a malayali. We consider ourselves lucky to be born into the lap of the abundant beauty of nature.We are also proud of our cuisines.There is always a malayali in every corner of the world.. #ProudToBeMalayali#ProudKeralite
Meeting between TEAM BHARAT and Ministy of Petroleum and Natural Gas is still on.
Meeting started at 12.50 pm.
This is currently on at the Ministry at Kartavya Bhavan!!
Our Demands that we are putting forward are:
*E10 Petrol must be available for E10 compliant vehicles.
*Reduce the price of E0 (pure petrol) & ensure it is available on all petrol pumps.
*Give a 20%discount on E20 Fuel.
*Put all documents of E20Fuel policy in public domain.
*Shri Nitin Gadkari ji is in Conflict of Interest with regards to the Ethanol blending policy & this must be addressed
@OGTeamBharat
When something goes horribly wrong under their dept, the minister in charge should step down, plain and simple.
It doesn't matter if they didn't personally cause the disaster or even know every detail of what was happening behind the scenes. Being in charge means taking credit when things go well, but it also means taking the fall when things fall apart. That is what true leadership is about.
Since politics is all about strategic morality than real morality, I'll talk about strategy only. Stepping down isn't a sign of weakness; it’s actually a smart, strong political move. When a minister stays put after a major disaster, the story becomes all about them trying to save their own job, and the controversy just drags on endlessly. A quick resignation clears the air. It acts like a fresh start, allowing the govt to bring in new leadership, fix the problem, and show the public that they actually care about high standards. It builds way more respect with voters than digging in your heels ever will.
When someone stays in office purely so the administration doesn't "look weak," or so the opposition doesn't see a resignation as a win, it tells the public that party pride matters more than accountability. Voters can easily tell the difference between standing firm on principle and being too stubborn to own up to a failure.
Honest feedback for the GoI to consider, offered as a well-wisher:
1. E20 is a massive issue. Just because people aren't protesting in the streets doesn't mean it isn't. There is a simmering anger everywhere.
2. The root cause of this mess is singular: someone decided it was acceptable to ignore the National Policy on Biofuels 2018's plan to introduce E20 in 2030, which would have allowed older, non-compliant vehicles to phase out naturally. Instead, E20 was rolled out despite the fact that most vehicles on the road are not calibrated to run on it.
3. There is no "lobby" behind this public frustration. If the govt believes there is, they should expose the nexus and let citizens decide for themselves. Otherwise, ministers and spokespersons are only making things worse by using "lobbies" and "deep states" as defensive arguments.
4. Vehicle performance is suffering. Drivers are experiencing a drop in mileage and damage to parts. After months of denial, even Nitin Gadkari and Hardeep Puri have acknowledged "some issues" with Ethanol.
5. If the goal is true energy security, the focus and push must shift toward EVs, alongside exploring nuclear energy as a primary power source. The govt should encourage and incentivize EV adoption through subsidies and a robust infrastructure network. Ethanol, in the way it is currently being implemented, is doing more harm than good.
6. The solution is to provide a choice between E0 and E20. If the current fuel infrastructure cannot support both, E20 should be rolled back to E10 until 2030. This will allow older cars and bikes to be phased out naturally before moving forward. And also, do not introduce E27 or whatever is next till the new fleet is E27 compliant and all E20 cars are phased out, unless there is an infrastructure in place to dispense both in future.
गडकरी और हरदीप पुरी को एक सुझाव देना चाहूँगा:
जब आप गड्ढे में हों तो खोदना बंद कर दें
और यदि आप मंत्री हैं तो देश की...
मैंने राहुल शिवशंकर के साथ का साक्षात्कार सुना, उसमे भी खूब आँकड़े दिए गए कि किसानों को कितना करोड़ दे दिया, कितना करोड़ फोरेक्स बचाया ब्ला ब्ला ब्ला!
यह पूछने पर कि E10 या शुद्ध पेट्रोल का विकल्प क्यों नहीं दिया, तो @HardeepSPuri ने कहा: विकल्प अच्छे का देते हैं, ख़राब का नहीं।
इस बकलोली का उत्तर यह है: E10 या शुद्ध पेट्रोल उन गाड़ियों के लिए अच्छा विकल्प है जिसकी इंजन उसी फ्यूल के लिए बनी हो, जिसकी संख्या २० करोड़ के आस-पास है। यानी, हरदीप पुरी के ही कथनानुसार, सरकार जानबूझकर २० करोड़ गाड़ियों को घटिया विकल्प दे रही है।
Ethanol will hurt the BJP electorally, not because of car owners, the are just 8% of the population, but because of bike owners, who make up 60%.
Every issue with a bike, irrespective of whether it's due to ethanol or not, is being blamed on ethanol. Remember that the overwhelming majority of car and bike mechanics are not your voters and, in fact, they hate you and you know why. They are actively telling anyone with any bike issue that it is due to ethanol. Not only does it serve a political purpose, but it is also easy and convincing.
Car and bike dealers are equally happy to lean into this excuse because it completely deflects blame away from the manufacturers and their own service centers. If a part fails prematurely or a vehicle suffers from a chronic engineering defect, blaming ethanol allows dealers to shift the responsibility onto government policy rather than admitting to poor build quality or honoring warranty claims. It gives them a convenient, politically charged scapegoat that customers readily accept, shielding the automotive brands from reputational damage.
It's up to the BJP to smell the coffee. The issue is no longer on Twitter and no longer raised just by English-speaking metro car owners. It has gone to the ground. There is still time to wake up and make corrections.
P.S. I'm not defending ethanol here. It does damage engines and parts. I've been strongly opposing it and will keep doing so. I'm only saying what's happening on the ground. The BJP should do a course correction on ethanol solely because its implementation was wrong and correcting it is only logical. However, since politicians see every controversy from the standpoint of electoral gains and losses, I'm telling them that it will hurt them electorally too.
Last post was taken down so putting it again
✅ Drive your existing petrol Car as much as possible and squeeze it to the pulp
✅ If your existing car with airbags not showing any issues, don’t upgrade to a new car
✅ Avoid deserted petrol pumps on highways and village pumps. Prefer Jio, Shell & Nayara for better pump level infrastructure.
✅ Forget about resale value in this use-and-throw era of cars
✅ Get an extended warranty on a new car and totally avoid any modifications, upgrade of tyres and alloys not to risk the warranty.
✅ Avoid using any fuel additives when car is in warranty.
✅ Keep your tank minimum 20% filled if you drive frequently.
✅ Prefer Naturally Aspirated Petrol from MS / Honda / Toyota/ Koreans as a beater in AT/AMT car and avoid spending big out of emotions.
There is a press conference happening today on E20 b mly the expert group on behalf of the petroleum ministry.
I'm sure they won't be taking any questions. They will speak the same mumbo-jumbo : it's safe, energy security, lower crude import, more income to farmers, oil lobby, foreign hand blah blah and leave.
Even if they take question, no journalist will be smart enough to ask the real questions:
1. Why rolled out E20 when most of the vechiles weren't compliant.
2. Who will be responsible for wear and tear of non compliant cars. You'll say there are no reports world over for damage but that's because nowhere in the world have they introduced E20 without making sure that older vehicles have phased out and even then they kept the option of pure petrol for those few left with older cars. Ethanol corrodes non compliant cars. It's a known scientific fact. Why else would there is complaint cars if non compliant cars were as safe?
3. It was told ethanol blended fuel will be cheaper but it's costly than even erstwhile pure petrol because of mileage drop. People are buying more fuel for same useage.
Hardeep Puri said that ethanol is used in racing cars as well to defend his stand on E20. This is the Petroleum Minister's understanding of the issue. What can one even say to that!
First, race cars are specifically engineered to run on ethanol; therefore, it does not harm them. This is not the same as forcing E20 into regular cars that are not engineered to handle it. In non-compliant vehicles, ethanol will aggressively degrade standard rubber gaskets, plastic parts, and aluminum components over time.
Second, a racing engine is built to survive for only a few hundred miles before being stripped down and rebuilt by professional mechanics, who easily manage any fuel-induced wear. An average citizen, however, needs their car to last for over a decade. Running non-compliant engines on E20 will certainly not help achieve that.
Third, race teams use ethanol solely for a performance boost due to its high octane rating, not for fuel economy. For regular people, however, fuel economy matters immensely.
बिहार के मनीष कश्यप के साथ एथेनॉल वाला खेला हो गया।
दरअसल मनीष कश्यप की नई Toyota Innova HyCross (E20 Compatible) महज़ 12,000 किमी चलने के बाद खराब हो गई।
Toyota ने वारंटी देने से इनकार कर दिया।