@chatham58 Did they ever review and confirm the Shakir catch? There was PI on the play so there was no reason the ever review it on the field. Also, this play happened in week 18 which was reviewed and a confirmed INT. Its almost 1:1 with the Cooks play. The refs are fairly consistent here.
@ChadLofton@RuthlessKrez23@tHaCrYpToNiNjA@MLFootball Well that wasn't how it was ruled in game and there wasn't an uproar about it. Refs have consistently called this type of play an interception. It is deemed that after the process of the catch is completed, only the defender had control. Here's another one.
@LastMenPod@MLFootball Which one? This one where the same thing happens and the refs again correctly rule that the receiver did not survive the ground? The receiver has the ball in both hands tucked into his chest when his knee hits so he should be down by contact at that point according to bills fans
@jhardy4900@AirportIslander@tHaCrYpToNiNjA@MLFootball He has two hands on the ball when his knee hits. He only has one hand on the ball when his shoulder hits. As soon as his shoulder hits, he loses control of the football. If he did not lose control, how could the defender have taken the ball from him?
@EaracheEye@PaulPabst@GregTompsett It is. Which you can clearly see in this video his knee hits before any other body part. Should be down by contact. Irrelevant what happens after my image since he's down by contact according to your logic.
@EaracheEye@PaulPabst@GregTompsett True!!! Look at this still image!!! Possession, knee down, touched defender!!! This is a catch!!! Texans got hosed!!!
@grimyGuthian They have already said the next update they make to nightmare zone will be removing it from the game. We will never see improvements to nightmare zone