@SawyerMerritt So the total no of miles driven would amount to driving 277,000 times around the earth’s and still FSD needs to be supervised after all that ‘learning’.
Something tells me it’s a slow learner.
So the total no of miles driven would amount to driving 277,000 times around the earth and still FSD needs to be supervised after all that ‘learning’. Something tells me it’s a slow learner.
“If you feel something can’t be done, then get out of the way and let others who are capable do it” !
Waymo has done it, Rivian is doing it, Toyota is working on using it so each to their own ways of solving autonomy.
@SBeitelshees@itskyleconner Right ? Doesn’t it make you wonder why not a single auto company has bought into the FSD hype and licensed it inspite of Elon saying there were mfrs lining up for licensing FSD?
Makes me wonder why ? Must be the matrix playing with their heads and common sense .
All the Tesla fanboys feeling hurt that Elon was not able to license FSD to a single buyer - even though it was “Full self driving “ with vision only cameras .
There must be a reason why …
Ah, maybe because more auto companies want a more reliable autonomous system?
Remember, status-quo always benefits the existing rich people. They don’t want any change because that will change the dynamics of how they got so rich.
Millionaires and Billionaires who don’t actually live in NYC prognosticating on the future of New York.
Didnt you all say NYC was dead and would never recover after COVID when a handful of people moved to Florida?
@zachweinberg@KB43215 The moderate candidates did badly in the national polls - twice when Trump won.
The definition of insanity is to keep doing the same thing and expect different results.
@Drowlord101@efficientenzyme@tyler Thanks for that. On that I agree - the govt should not have done it. But this was a failure of capitalism gone rogue to only benefit the rich and powerful.
I will just leave some facts (contended) to end this thread…
@Drowlord101@efficientenzyme@tyler I like how you try and rationalize bail outs of failing banks while at the same time criticizing “socialism”. A true capitalistic principle would have been to let failing banks actually fail.
A lot of the banks didn’t pass a basic stress test either, so there ….
While socialism is not the solution everywhere, the young generation has become tired of the capitalistic system as it has failed them. People should look inwards and understand the failures instead of blaming socialism as it’s not an American mainstream system.
“Socialism” is the bogeyman used to scare people in America these days - while the robber keep robbing the same people under the guise of “excessive capitalism”
@Drowlord101@efficientenzyme@tyler The only place you could blame the govt was in lacking proper banking regulations and oversight.
And then when the banks crashed, and people lost houses, who do you think got the two was rescued ? Wall Street of course.
@Drowlord101@efficientenzyme@tyler It happened mainly because of Banking behaviour (banks lending at sub-prime rates) and consumer behaviour (people buying more house then they could afford). The Govt had lesser regulation .
- Excessive Subprime Lending
- Housing Bubble (market exuberance)
- Securitization & MBS
@Drowlord101@efficientenzyme@tyler What utter bullshit.
The whole mortgage crisis happened not because banks were “forced to” lend money at cheap rates. It was because banks could sell more mortgage backed securities bundle and make a killling on those assets. Then the cheap ARM rates reset and the show collapsed
@efficientenzyme@tyler Exactly. The whole mortgage crisis happened not because banks were “forced to” lend money at cheap rates. It was because banks could sell more mortgage backed securities bundle and make a killling on those assets. Then when the cheap ARM rates reset, the whole thing crashed.