Trader mutuals, let’s connect!
Follow = follow back 🤝
But hey, even if you’re not a trader, feel free to follow me too , I’ll definitely follow back ,
Let’s grow together worldwide
🟢24 Hours Flash GIVEAWAY 🟢
We are giving away 3 - 50k Classic CFD / Crypto Evaluations
To enter:
- Follow us on X
- Repost this Tweet
That’s it! Winners will be announced here in 24 Hours.
Good luck!
New giveaway - crypto prop firm 🔥
10 x 10K @bitfunded evals 🔥
To participate ⬇️
1️⃣ Like this post
2️⃣ Repost this post
3️⃣ Tag a trader
Goodluck, winners announced in 48hours 🫡
A message to every Prop Firm CEO and Risk Management Team.
FundingPips has extremely strong risk management systems, and we stand behind them.
When you see traders making accusations against us after risk violations, take it as an opportunity to investigate their activity at your firm too.
If you find the same violations, BAN THEM.
The industry needs to stand together against rule abusers.
Protect genuine traders, not those trying to outsmart the system.
I've always wondered why traders who withdraw and request payouts are made to go through interviews. It's as if the interview is a mandatory requirement. 😆 As if the interview is a "hidden rule" that, if not followed, results in payout rejection 🏃 #Propfirm#Traderproblems
People are sleeping on Blue Guardian Futures.
Good plans, real payouts, and another example of why having the right community behind you matters.
Isa won a @GuardianFutures giveaway on X, reached the payout stage, and hit a roadblock trying to schedule her risk interview.
PFW stepped in, helped resolve the issue, and her payout was approved.
We’ve seen 100s of thousands of dollars paid out to traders in our community without reported issues in those cases.
If you ever face a problem, we’ll help you navigate it.
Use code WISE for the best available discount + 2 FREE accounts on payout.
Seriously?
if that's all true, I think @FTMarketslive deserves to be called one of the best prop firms in this industry 🤣 honestly, I have failed payouts twice from 2 different propfirms bcoz the prop firm was made up an excuse without doing a proper investigation process.
I was looking at some numbers and realised we have never banned anyone for copy trading or account management without an interview first.
We always get signals that indicate some sort of connection within a group. The evidence gathered through trading patterns, IPs, KYCs and device IDs is just a trigger. An interview is then requested to confirm everything, and that is where it becomes crystal clear.
Sometimes they are clean and we pay. Sometimes it is evidently a group, mostly one or two people operating multiple KYCs. It becomes obvious when someone cannot even tell which program they trade at FTM. However, there are also traders who prove their case by providing everything, and if it all aligns, they are paid immediately after.
The point is this: system detections alone are not enough, and are never enough, to outright blame a trader for cheating esp when your database is too large (filter out noise/coincidences). Treat them as signals for further digging, never as a final outcome. Simply matching trades with other random accounts, hidden emails and timestamps is not going to convince any trader they copy traded (unless its against the same trader(s) every time over separate days) even if they have been doing it intentionally.
I am not saying traders never cheat. Show evidence that cannot be refuted. Fewer people will go to socials if you get them on something irrefutable.