Excuse me @The_Ben_Starr, It appears you may have exceeded acceptable levels of talent. Please withdraw from being so talented in either acting or singing. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Visited the Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 concert (London) yesterday. I am out of words how beautiful this was and is.
#clairobscurexpedition33#expedition33
@AxeeL Nier Automata si ni lo has jugado, FFXVI si te gusta el gรฉnero RPG de acciรณn (los combates contra bosses son de lo mรกs รฉpico/cinemรกtico que he jugado en mi vida), FF7R si puedes soportar que estรฉ en 3 partes y aรบn falte la tercera por salir
Many people wonder why (โ1) ร (โ1) equals 1, and whether there is a real proof behind it.
The key idea is that this result comes more from how we define multiplication than from discovering a new fact.
In mathematics, some things are proved, like special properties of numbers, while other things are defined in a way that keeps the system logical and consistent.
When we extend multiplication from positive numbers to negative numbers, we want important rulesโlike the distributive law a ร (b + c = aรb + aรc, to remain true.
For example, we know that 0 can be written as (โ1) + 1.
If we multiply both sides by โ1, the left side stays 0, while the right side becomes (โ1 ร โ1) + (โ1 ร 1). Since (โ1 ร 1) is โ1, the expression becomes (โ1 ร โ1) โ 1.
For both sides to stay equal, this must equal 0, which means (โ1 ร โ1) must be 1. So, negative times negative equals positive not by accident, but because we define multiplication in a way that keeps math consistent, simple, and useful.
Ben Starr is back!? Which means the Square Enix Publisher Sale is now on!
Full video tomorrow at 6:00 PST / 14:00 GMT. Stay tuned. https://t.co/yOQgMJCc2W
The Square Enix Publisher Sale is now on!
Meet our *NEW* host, Matthew Mercer, who is here to help you find your next RPG - accompanied by our long-time bestie Ben Starr... whether we asked for it or not.