In this special virtual episode of InsightEdge, Mehul Pandya, MD and Group CEO, CareEdge engages with Dhruva Jaishankar, ED, ORF America to unpack the forces reshaping the global order; from China+1 opportunities and strategic autonomy to AI, supply chains, and future of power.
Aerospace propulsion hasn't seen a fundamental shift in decades. Today, we're changing that.
Proud to announce that DeepPropulse Aerospace has secured ₹25 Crore in seed funding led by IAN Alpha Fund to build the future of high-speed flight.
https://t.co/mR6aXDw3jv
@ss_dox@iftekhar254@rabby_123 Just copeing
In next few years their single sector economy will be f'ed due to ind-eu fta.
After that it's just begging all the way
The He zun bronze does contain "宅兹中国", but in the 11th century BCE, "Zhongguo" meant "the central region" ; the Zhou royal domain ; not a country called China. Dynasties called themselves Tang, Ming, or Qing, not Zhongguo, as formal state names until very recently. Plus what Zhongguo also meant different regions in different times depending on the empire ruling. So your core premise is completely wrong lmao. (I have discussed all of it in my article)
So the modern "China" is a 20th-century political designation retrofitted onto an ancient term, Continuity exists on both sides, but the claim that one is a timeless country name and the other is "just a geographical term" is historically illiterate. It's a nationalist slogan, not history.
Until Indian Muslim historiographers develop a distinct Indo-Muslim school of historiography, their community will continue seeking validation such random nobodies merely because they happen to say or write something that they find in their favour.
It's a pity how incompetent we, as a community and as academics, are that such frauds come to be regarded as angelic figures by our community.
Keep this in mind: foreigners (foreign to Indian Muslim civilisation) can never, never be trusted with socio-political historiography.
They may be trusted to uncover, compile, and analyse written records, but that is it and never to write socio-political historiography.
It is simply impossible (IMPOSSIBLE) for them to accurately represent us or our past. They have their own schools to represent and write based on it.
@ss_dox@iftekhar254@rabby_123 Exactly.
Hindu Bengalis have been the ruling class sing anga and vanga janapada era till pala including the Mauryan and gupta local governers.
Bengali muslims are literally descendants of labourers, shudras and other lower castes who used to work for hindu bengalis
Jio is transforming from a telecom company to a full tech company!
They have filed for IPO and applied for over 6,800 patents. Jio is now focusing on AI, cloud, cybersecurity, and digital services. Over 11,300 employees are working on technology and digital products.
The game is changing in telecom!
https://t.co/yyVlVGZPDl
Archeologists dropped a new bombshell!🔥
A newly analysed, directly dated OCP Copper Hoard weapon has revealed something explosive: it contains up to 30% iron and belongs to around 2000 BCE. 1🔥🔥🔥🔥
This single finding overturns decades of textbook claims about when iron use began in India.
For years we were told that the subcontinent only entered the Iron Age around 1000 BCE and that all Vedic references to iron must therefore be late.
But this darker, copper–iron alloyed weapon, far removed from the typical reddish hue of pure copper, fits astonishingly well with the metallurgical vocabulary of the later Vedic texts.
The Yajurveda and Atharvaveda repeatedly speak of Kṛṣṇa Ayas and Śyāma Ayas, terms meaning dark, blackened, or dusky metal.
Scholars struggled to explain these references under the 1000 BCE Iron Age model, but the OCP weapon’s composition finally resolves the puzzle.
A copper–iron alloy with about 30% iron naturally produces a darker, harder metal, precisely matching the textual descriptions.
Even in Rāmāyaṇa and Mahābhārata, the weapons described as dark or blackened never aligned well with the narrative of a late-arriving Iron Age.
Now, with actual artefacts reflecting this alloy at 2000 BCE, the material record and the textual record are unmistakably aligned.
Ṛgveda, in contrast, mostly uses the simple term Ayas meaning “metal”—which in early contexts overwhelmingly refers to copper.
This is exactly what one expects from a text whose composition ends before widespread copper–iron alloying, that is, by around 1900 BCE during the final phase of the Sarasvatī civilisation.
Later Vedic texts describing darker metals fit chronologically after 2000 BCE, while the Ṛgvedic use of generic Ayas fits a copper-dominant world.
This single discovery therefore collapses the long-held assumption that iron in North India appears only after 1000 BCE.
With directly dated alloyed weapons from 2000 BCE, and with Vedic literature already distinguishing between reddish copper (Ayas) and darker copper–iron alloys (Kṛṣṇa Ayas, Śyāma Ayas), the entire colonial chronology begins to melt.
The archaeological record is now catching up with what the texts had always preserved.
🚨 HUGE FUEL PRICE RELIEF?
Modi Govt says fuel prices may be REDUCED once recently purchased CHEAPER crude oil reaches Indian refiners.
— BIG Relief to Indians may be coming soon🎯
@iftekhar254@rabby_123 Since fall of palas Bengal has been under foreign rule.
Sena Dynasty was from deccan. Then delhi sultanate local governers were turkic.
Independent bengal sultenate was ruled by turkic, persian, afghans not bengali muslims.
Then mughal and Brits.
When exactly