మానవత్వానికి మతం లేదు.. రియాజుద్దీన్ రియల్ హీరో!🫡
ఢిల్లీ మాలవీయ నగర్లోని ఒక హోటల్లో భారీ అగ్నిప్రమాదం జరిగింది.
ప్రాణభయంతో 2, 3 అంతస్తుల నుండి కిందికి దూకబోతున్న ప్రజలను చూసి, కిందే ఉన్న పరుపుల వ్యాపారి **రియాజుద్దీన్** క్షణం కూడా ఆలోచించలేదు.
తను నష్టపోతాను అని ఆలోచించకుండా , రూ. 2 లక్షల విలువైన పరుపులన్నింటినీ వెంటనే రోడ్డుపై పరిచాడు.
బిల్డింగ్ పైనుంచి దూకిన 8 నుండి 12 మంది ప్రాణాలు ఆ పరుపుల వల్ల సురక్షితంగా నిలిచాయి! అందులో విదేశీయులు కూడా
ఉన్నారు
"డబ్బులకంటే ప్రాణాలు ముఖ్యం, ఆ క్షణంలో వారిని కాపాడటమే నా లక్ష్యం" అంటూ రియాజుద్దీన్ చాటుకున్న మానవత్వానికి హ్యాట్సాఫ్.
#Delhi #MalviyaNagar
A 24-year-old Polish tennis player arrived in Paris last week ranked 114th in the world, with no sponsors, no guaranteed income, and no certainty she could even pay for her hotel room.
She had to win three qualifying matches just to enter the French Open main draw. Prize money is only paid at the end of the tournament, so a Polish sports drink brand quietly stepped in and covered her hotel bill.
Her name is Maja Chwalinska. And today, she plays in the French Open final.
Before this tournament, she had won exactly one Grand Slam main draw match in her entire career. She had battled depression so severe that in 2021 she couldn't get out of bed. She underwent knee surgery in 2022. She spent years grinding through small tournaments across Europe just to stay afloat.
Then she arrived in Paris, won three qualifiers, and kept winning. Zheng Qinwen. Elise Mertens. Maria Sakkari. Diana Shnaider. Nine straight matches. One set dropped.
She is now the first qualifier in French Open history to reach the final. The last time a qualifier reached a Grand Slam final, it was Emma Raducanu at the 2021 US Open. Raducanu won.
By simply making the final, Chwalinska has earned more prize money than her entire career combined. The runner-up cheque alone is $1.6 million. If she wins today, she takes home $3.25 million.
One week ago she couldn't pay for her hotel room.
As a filmmaker, I believe cinema should entertain, inspire, and connect with audiences. It should never make anyone feel uncomfortable or disrespected. We have heard the feedback regarding certain scenes in Peddi and have taken it seriously.
I have always had immense respect for women, both on and off screen, and it was never our intention to objectify or disrespect any female character. If any part of the film has been perceived that way, we respect those sentiments, understand the concerns being raised, and sincerely apologize.
After reviewing the feedback, we have decided to make changes to the concerned portions. Cinema grows through its connection with audiences, and as storytellers, we have a responsibility to be mindful of evolving perspectives and sensitivities.
Every woman deserves to be respected, valued, and represented with dignity. We remain committed to telling stories that celebrate strong characters and uphold those values.
Thank you to everyone who shared their views honestly and sincerely."
My two biggest issues with Director #Pandiraaj in #PanimalarAndCo are
1) we are in 2026. And we are in Tamil Nadu. You are a dark skinned Tamil guy yourself. What kind of a sick mentality to still have jokes on Yogi Babu?
2) I get that you name his character after Nayantara's children to take so many digs on that name. We may all have issues with Nayantara and Vignesh Shivn for some silly reasons too. But why take it on the kids?! Like really.
Pathetic and had to call out!
A 17-year-old just got the CBSE chairman removed from his post.
No lawyer. No journalist. No agency.
Just one student with a doubt.
Sarthak Sidhant got his 12th grade results. Something felt wrong.
So he requested a copy of his scanned answer sheet. Something felt wrong again. That one doubt changed everything. He started digging.
He read hundreds of pages of CBSE tender documents. Not one. Not ten. Hundreds of pages.
That's when he noticed something shocking. The rules in the tender documents were changing every single year.
Why would rules keep changing every year? He dug deeper. The answer was disturbing.
The rules were being changed specifically to benefit one company. Coempt Edutech Private Limited.
But here's the twist.
This company wasn't new.
It was previously called Globarena Private Limited — based in Telangana.
That company was already blacklisted.
So they just changed their name. Won the tender. And started evaluating answer sheets of lakhs of CBSE students.
Sarthak wrote a blog. Posted it online. It went viral. The parliamentary committee called him directly.
He walked in with 7 pages of proof.
Within hours
The CBSE chairman was removed.
The secretariat was removed.
A 17-year-old did what investigating agencies couldn't.
One doubt. Hundreds of pages. Seven pages of proof.
A 17-year-old just got the CBSE chairman removed from his post.
No lawyer. No journalist. No agency.
Just one student with a doubt.
Sarthak Sidhant got his 12th grade results. Something felt wrong.
So he requested a copy of his scanned answer sheet. Something felt wrong again. That one doubt changed everything. He started digging.
He read hundreds of pages of CBSE tender documents. Not one. Not ten. Hundreds of pages.
That's when he noticed something shocking. The rules in the tender documents were changing every single year.
Why would rules keep changing every year? He dug deeper. The answer was disturbing.
The rules were being changed specifically to benefit one company. Coempt Edutech Private Limited.
But here's the twist.
This company wasn't new.
It was previously called Globarena Private Limited — based in Telangana.
That company was already blacklisted.
So they just changed their name. Won the tender. And started evaluating answer sheets of lakhs of CBSE students.
Sarthak wrote a blog. Posted it online. It went viral. The parliamentary committee called him directly.
He walked in with 7 pages of proof.
Within hours
The CBSE chairman was removed.
The secretariat was removed.
A 17-year-old did what investigating agencies couldn't.
One doubt. Hundreds of pages. Seven pages of proof.