@MccardJoseph@Dragonmaurizio@SchroedingersC9 Dunno why it's important to read it.
Maybe to point out that the students should think what energy is or isn't, just to spark some ideas. That is exactly what I'm doing not accepting the status quo we can't understand it.
@MccardJoseph@Dragonmaurizio@SchroedingersC9 Talking about their interactions, electromagnetic force, strong and weak nuclear force and the gravitational force.
Because you quote Newton.
@MccardJoseph@Dragonmaurizio@SchroedingersC9 Yes.
"Itโs intriguing that the chair is mostly empty space and the thing that stops you going through it is vibrations or energy fields." Richard Dawkins
But it is not empty it has strings in it that vibrate, which result in light, matter and their interaction.
@MccardJoseph@Dragonmaurizio@SchroedingersC9 What is light, by definition matter, and their forces? The medium in vibration which is what we call energy.
h (medium) f (vibration) = E
@MccardJoseph@Dragonmaurizio@SchroedingersC9 Energy is not an unknown fact, they experimentally have proven the photon to be a quanta of elektromagnetic forces. So light is not an elektromagnetic wave, elektromagnetic waves is light and so are the strong and weak atomic forces and so are we.
They only miss one thing.
@MccardJoseph@Dragonmaurizio@SchroedingersC9 Waking up as in having no vibration into a state of vibration. From zero to 0,5 Hz, deep sleep unconsciousness to lucid dream conscious to all information of the universe, the end and the beginning. The nothingness becomes all, the all becomes nothingness, a โซ๏ธ
@MccardJoseph@Dragonmaurizio@SchroedingersC9 The dreamworld, delta brainwaves have a frequency of 0.5Hz at 0Hz we are braindeath. Maybe the undefined nothingness dreamed us unconsciously, after waking up from death only to realise everything before dying again.
@MccardJoseph@Dragonmaurizio@SchroedingersC9 My worldview stems from one point which vibrates and can create all we observe today, macro/micro.
Your worldview stems from a multitude of vibrations.
Scientifically any hypothesis with the least assumptions is more likely correct, no?