NJ

[Dr. Neha Das @neha_laldas]

What reparations?
1. ST reservation is not because of atrocities, but geographical isolation.

2. OBC reservation is because of social/educational/economic backwardness.

3. Even GCs faced atrocities historically:
-Thousands of rajput women committed jauhar because of muslim atrocities!
-Thousands of brahmins were persecuted by muslim rulers!
-British rulers committed atrocities of everyone!

4. GC includes jains, parsis, sikhs, christians, muslims, and multiple castes other than brahmins.
Who committed atrocities on whom?

5. Most importantly, which law in the world says, people from current generation need to be persecuted for historical events?

Please read Constitution and Constituent assembly debates to understand why reservation was given 1st!!

[Reservation Hatao Andolan (RHA ) @Bharat_Yatra_]

Hello Friends

We’ve seen a lot of discussions about reservation in the last few days.
Many different opinions are coming from various General Category accounts:
-Some want to completely end reservation
-Some want only reforms in the current system
-Some want reservation based on economic status
-Some also want to end caste discrimination

Let’s be clear:
All these views are part of the same movement.

We all want to openly discuss the problems with reservation and find a better path forward - one that benefits the country and rewards merit.
Even if our opinions differ, we share the same goal.
So let’s support each other.

This is just the beginning…
The beginning of a merit-based society, where talent is rewarded, not caste.

Thank You🙏

Jai Hind 🇮🇳 Jai Bharat 🇮🇳💪

#reservationhataomovement
#EndReservationNow

[nisarga @ni5arga]

CBSE also denied being hacked initially. We all know who controls PIB, I am not surprised that they are denying that they got hacked and actual nuclear research data was leaked in the breach. Reuters is way more trustable than PIB.

Boarding a flight right now, will be back with more information if needed after I land.

[nisarga @ni5arga]

@IndianCERT @Cyberdost good morning, bank of baroda’s internal vapt reports along with a lot of customer PII & KYC information got breached.

can you guys stop posting ai-generated cyber hygiene slop for five minutes and actually do your job?

[Rahul Gandhi @RahulGandhi]

छात्रों को मारने का आदेश किसने दिया?

[nisarga @ni5arga]

Never forget that the Indian government had blocked GitHub & Pastebin in 2014 and one government official said that:

> These are all providing very dangerous kind of cut and paste services. You can take code, cut it, paste it, remove it, delete it.

[NJ @NJspeaktruth]

@deshbhaktfirse Yes this too 🙌

[Cockroach is Back @Cockroachisback]

DEMOCRACY WINS! 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

[Dhruv Rathee @dhruv_rathee]

Jhukti hai duniya, bas jhukane wala chahiye

Congratulations to the GenZ, Students, Cockroach Janta Party and the people of India ✊🇮🇳

[NJ @NJspeaktruth]

@dpradhanbjp Long live the revolution 🗣️ 🔥🔥🔥

[Rahul Gandhi @RahulGandhi]

मेट्रो बंद करो।
रास्ते बंद करो।
दुकानें बंद करो।
Internet बंद करो।
खाना बंद करो।

अपना हक़ मांग रहे छात्रों के ख़िलाफ़ सरकार ने ये क्रूर कदम उठाए।

बस एक चीज़ बंद नहीं कर पाए, मोदी जी - पेपर लीक।

[🚨Indian Gems @IndianGems_]

"The government of india does not like technologies."

— Jack Dorsey, Twitter's Founder

[NJ @NJspeaktruth]

@svembu https://t.co/l7A1DhtkfF

[NJ @NJspeaktruth]

@aravind Fuck censorship and fuck everyone who try to bring censorship.... It never about protecting children it always about spreading ur dogshit political parties propoganda and stopping other from having defferent opinion

[NJ @NJspeaktruth]

@aravind Fuck censorship and fuck everyone who try to bring censorship.... It never about protecting children it always about spreading ur dogshit political parties propoganda and stopping other from having defferent opinion

[Sachin Gupta @Sachingupta]

उत्तराखंड पुलिस के सिपाही शेर सिंह ने जंतर मंतर पहुंचकर अपना इस्तीफा अभिजीत दीपके के हाथ में थमा दिया। वह छात्रों के प्रोटेस्ट को अपना खुलकर समर्थन देने आए हैं।

[Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) @internetfreedom]

Statement : The blocking of BitChat's code on GitHub is unconstitutional and authoritarian.

New Delhi, 24 July 2026

The Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) condemns the order issued by the Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C), Ministry of Home Affairs, directing GitHub to remove the code repositories of BitChat.

The order, Notice No. 11072601011432, was issued at 11:16 pm on 23 July 2026 under Section 79(3)(b) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 read with Rule 3(1)(d) of the IT Rules, 2021. The order directs GitHub to disable access to three repositories, including the Android application and its release files, within three hours. It threatens the platform with loss of safe harbour and criminal prosecution. No copy was published by the Government of India. The public learnt of it from a post by @jack, whose team develops BitChat. Censorship in India now comes to light through disclosure by the censored.

Since 17 July 2026, the Ministry of Home Affairs has suspended mobile internet around Jantar Mantar as per public reports about five times, most recently within a 1.5 kilometre radius from 4 pm until midnight on 23 July. That radius takes in Janpath and parts of Connaught Place. Reports describe signal jammers at the protest site and people walking two kilometres before their phones work. Inside that zone a student separated from her group during a detention drive cannot send a message to say where she is. Thousands of students and young people have camped at Jantar Mantar since June, seeking accountability for examination irregularities. Permission for their march to Parliament was refused. Metro stations were shut and also internet connectivity has been blocked.

BitChat is an open source application built for exactly this situation. It passes messages from phone to phone over Bluetooth, without mobile networks or a central server. It is striking that the order does not identify a single unlawful message. It objects to what BitChat is. In its own words, the application is dangerous because it enables communication "even during network restrictions" and can "circumvent lawful restrictions" during "internet shutdowns". Hence, the government's objection is that citizens can speak to one another while it has switched the internet off.

The order is illegal on at least four grounds.

1. Section 79(3)(b) is not a blocking power. In Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) 5 SCC 1, the Supreme Court read down the provision. Intermediaries may be required to act only on a court order, or a government notification confined to the grounds under Article 19(2) of the Constitution. Blocking is governed exclusively by Section 69A and the Blocking Rules, 2009, which require a hearing and reasons recorded in writing, subject to review. Directions issued under Section 79(3)(b), Rule 3(1)(d) and the Sahyog Portal evade these safeguards, and constitutional challenges to this parallel regime are pending before High Courts.

2. The reasons in the order are circular. The order asserts that the repositories contain "information which is prohibited under any law" without naming any such information, and rests on what the application is "capable of" enabling. Anticipated misuse of a communications tool is not a lawful basis to prohibit the tool. By this logic a telephone exchange could be sealed.

3. The order cites Section 43 of the IT Act, a civil compensation provision, alongside conspiracy and abetment offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, against a platform that hosts code.

4. A three hour deadline issued close to midnight forecloses legal assessment and recourse, and fails the proportionality standard in Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (2020) 3 SCC 637.

The order also fails on its own terms as deleting a repository does not delete the application from any phone that carries it, and the mesh keeps functioning without servers. What the takedown actually prevents is scrutiny of the underlying code.

IFF demands that the Government of India:

1. Withdraw Notice No. 11072601011432 dated 23 July 2026 issued to GitHub.
2. Publish every takedown direction issued under Section 79(3)(b), Rule 3(1)(d) and the Sahyog Portal, with the reasons recorded for each.
3. Restore full connectivity around Jantar Mantar, publish all suspension orders, and disclose the legal authority for the deployment of jammers.

We stand with the developers and the young protesters whose speech this order seeks to silence.

[nisarga @ni5arga]

you gotta be kidding me, the indian government asked to block GitHub URLs in an official order

[Abhijeet Dipke @abhijeet_dipke]

The government is rewarding corruption instead of ensuring accountability!

Last night, the Education Secretary was transferred. He was replaced by an IAS officer from the Animal Husbandry Department who has severe multi-crore corruption charges against him.

The entire crisis around paper leaks and NEET was about systemic corruption. Replacing one bureaucrat with another facing serious corruption allegations is a direct INSULT to young people across India.

Is this the "compromise" the government expects us to accept? This is not accountability. We will not stop until Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan resigns ✊

[NJ @NJspeaktruth]

@JNU_official_50 Shame on u, protesting is the fundamental right of every citizen