@damianplayer I feel the Iranian guy with the lemons took the whole "when life deals you lemons, just make lemonade", thing way too seriously ...although that's one way to get the skinny on the next Trump pivot...maybe they will book him a flight to Islamabad after all.
@ZeroHedge_ Assuming AI will eventually be able to draw on the entire corpus of human knowledge, the ultimate skill will lie in knowing how to structure the right question(s) whose answer helps you solve the problem at hand.
Technically indistinguishable from MDLs available in Colorado, Utah, Arizona, Iowa, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Missouri, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, Kentucky, New York, and Virginia. Of course MDLs are not mandatory for employment in those states but the technical implementation will be likely be indistinguishable.
What complete and utter garbage. This is clearly nonsense. While the technical specification has yet to be finalised, the recently published Britcard proposal (https://t.co/Zcf2tU4WlZ) indicates a strong preference for a Verified Credential architecture with zero-knowldge proofs that leverages the existing passport office database to issue the credential and as an ongoing registry. That is clearly not designed to accumulate additional data on your behaviour and even if that was their intent, it would be a substantialy more complicated endeavour. Ffs, enough of this paranoia. Learn about zero-knowledge VCs. They are privacy preserving and self-sovereign by design.
This shouldnt be about whether we have a digital ID (obviously, in a digital age, we need one), but about *how* you implement it. 20 years of work on self sovereign identity has resulted in innovations that remove all notion of Big Brother - verified credentials. Governments issue digital IDs in the same way they issue passports, and authenticity can be verified cryptographically, without the government being able track who is verifying the credential, or when. The question is how will the UK government issue and manage a digital IDs and how can we reduce the likelihood of them stuffing it up.
Not so much punishment, more about putting up barriers to prevent you from creating value outside of their ecosystem. And if you think Google Is bad, try getting access to your Meta data! Or LinkedIn. I spend days trying to get the LinkedIn access token to work. This stuff is deliberately difficult.
Right at the end of this Claude Code demo, Boris was asked why they built it in the terminal, his answer: coding AI models are developing so quickly , they aren’t sure IDEs will be useful going forward…..🤯 that is the wildest statement I have heard in a very long time. Deep dive article to follow soon. Huge repercussions on what skills you should be developing or hiring. https://t.co/pffmWbyK6W
I agree but was there something in particular you didn't like? Personal Context worries me. Admittedly, I have a bias. But it surprises me more people are not concerned about this trend of large model providers reaching for more of your personal data with little evidence you retain control. Permission is meaningless without retaining control.
If you want to understand why Tariffs are a one dimensional, and likely ineffective, fix to the problems manufactures in the US face, watch this excellent documentary - https://t.co/vMHeXp2aJe