Tucker Carlson argues that advances in technology have enabled a small technocratic elite to impose control over millions through mass surveillance.
He maintains that surveillance is not about safety or reducing crime, but about suppressing dissent and instilling powerlessness among the population.
"The point is not to help you in any way. The point is to control you and make dissent impossible."
"It's to diminish you and remind you of your powerlessness so you don't rebel as they drain the treasury and eliminate... the things that make life worth living."
🚨 BREAKING: Matt Campbell drops a massive truth bomb on Piers Morgan!
He confirms overwhelming evidence proves explosives brought down the Twin Towers.
Top physicists completely contradict the fake US government narrative to expose the Zionist coverup.
To believe that a .30 caliber bullet struck Charlie's neck, you must ignore the following:
- The wound exhibits no characteristics of a high-velocity impact.
- The circuit board caused his shirt collar to rise up over his cheek, becoming exposed before falling back underneath the shirt.
- The necklace snapped before any wound appeared and flew up and around his head.
- The battery impacted his neck, penetrating the tissue and causing a laceration of the jugular before falling out of the wound.
- Fragments of the RØDE microphone case flew out from underneath Charlie's shirt.
- The low-frequency event originating from under the tent timed perfectly with the shirt movement.
- There is a complete absence of a temporary cavity, which a 150-grain bullet would produce upon impacting soft tissue.
My team and I were trying to confirm the null hypothesis, which is that CK was shot with a .30-06 from the stated position on the roof of the Losee building.
To confirm this hypothesis, we should have been able to get a .30-06 round top stop in a simulated human neck.
Even when we thoroughly stacked the deck in favor of that null outcome (by purposely shooting thicker muscle masses with thick bones in them), we were unable to reproduce that behavior. Not even close.
Because we used fresh backstops, we can also state that we didn't even get one shot to meaningfully deflect even slightly. They all went straight through.
We repeated the tests 55 times with 5 different .30-06 loads (see below). Every round was cataloged, and videos were taken from 2 directions, with one camera at 260 fps and the other at 460 fps.
So we are in the position of rejecting the null hypothesis and accepting the other, which was that the shot that killed CK was not taken with a .30-06 from that position.
This is how experiments are conducted scientifically.
Why would the Utah SBI hire a private Israeli company to conduct digital forensics on this text exchange when Utah is home to the largest computer forensics lab in all of the western United States? And when the state has a contract with the digital forensics crime lab at Utah Tech University?
Presenting a witness's statements without live cross-examination undermines the spirit of the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause, which guarantees the accused the right to confront adverse witnesses. Even if permissible under preliminary hearing rules, relying on untested statements can be highly prejudicial because credibility cannot be meaningfully challenged before the court.
Hahaha the very first time Jeffrey Epstein’s name ever appeared in print, in November 1992, the writer repeatedly called him a “spy” and specifically referenced his rumored connections to “the CIA and Mossad.”
@paramounttactcl Silly me for thinking Utah County Sheriff kept tidy records. Lawyers are accustomed to relying on law enforcement records. They're typically accurate.
"ARREST DATE 9/11/2025 | 10:00 PM"
🚨 LMAO!! A hilarious reconstruction completely exposes the prosecution's absurd theory!
They claim the suspect hid a massive rifle stock down his pants, causing a limp.
Why would he do this instead of just using his backpack?
The establishment's case is a joke!
If @RealCandaceO were truly insane, nobody would give her the time of day. Instead, they scream at everything she says because they believe it matters. The louder the outrage, the greater the attention. Perhaps the Streisand Effect is due for a makeover. Meet the Owens Effect.
Charlie Kirk’s parents are now demanding that the judge makes all of the evidence presented in the preliminary hearing public for the world to see. As Candace would say, “they don’t know, know, but they know!”
They police just took a pic of the Lance’s phone, guys! Biggest assasination since JFK and they decided not to collect it and store it into evidence. Just trusted him and took a couple of cute pics for insta.
And now Lance has immunity.
And of course the judge ruled that the defense did not need to examine these messages for authenticity at this stage of the hearing.
It’s just not necessary at this stage- got it?
Enjoy your Fed slop!
PROSECUTION: “Did you and Tyler ever discuss political issues like gender identity or LGBTQ rights?”
LANCE TWIGGS: “No.”
So Robinson killed Charlie for being anti-trans but never discussed gender identity issues with his trans furry-loving boyfriend? Bullshit.
So now that we know that the bullets allegedly used to shoot Charlie appear to be brand new FMJ rounds and that Tyler was not a great shot-
Can’t wait to watch the fed sloppers move their goal posts and explain how brand new .30-06 FMJ stops in a human neck.
I was told there were mountains of evidence to convict Tyler Robinson, instead I am left with mountains of questions, contradictions, and wildly improbable coincidences.