@shinobuandpooh@Sy489425@free_da_ute 1. 전쟁관련 사과를 했다=Fact
2. 사과를 한뒤 전범을 추모하는 곳에서 추모했다=fact
3. 07년 위안부는 강제가 아니었다고 말 돌림=fact
4. 13년 3번과 같은 말 반복
3, 4번이 계속됨 그럼 피해자 입장에서는 진실된 사과라고 볼 수없지 계속 말을 돌리는데
@Dinow0sk@hny720 그리고 이에따라 한국은 컬러리즘이 존재할 수 없는 국가야. 즉 5000년동안 심지어 식민지도 같은 동북아에서 당했기때문에. 피부색이 어둡든 밝든 어떻든간에 차별받지 않아. 그냥 5000년동안 축적된 그저 미의 기준이야. 참고로 나는 한국 사학과 학위가 있어.
@Dinow0sk@hny720 미안한데 조선은 귀족이 없었어. 찾아보면 알겠지만 과거라는 시험이 있었고 거기에서 3대가 떨어지면 양반이 되지못하지. 그니까 결국 귀족이라는건 없고 양반이라는 특수한 권력이 있었다는거야. 즉 피부색으로 계층을 나누는건 없었고 그냥 공부만 잘하면 됐음. 그리고 과거시험 통과하면 양반이 됨
Cut the performative bullshit. East Asian skin, Koreans, Japanese, Chinese, is built different, and the endless online meltdowns about “natural” skin tone prove most people have no clue how biology actually works.
East Asians typically land on Fitzpatrick skin types III to IV. Type III: sometimes burns, tans to light brown. Type IV: burns minimally, tans to a solid moderate brown. This isn’t theory. It’s dermatology. Their skin produces melanin efficiently when hit with UV. It doesn’t turn into a peeling lobster like a ginger from Ireland (Type I-II). It darkens to protect itself.
That’s exactly why Korean football/soccer players look noticeably darker after training under the sun all day. Their skin is doing what it’s genetically wired to do. Baseline pale skin? That’s what you get when someone lives indoors, wears SPF like armor, and follows the cultural script.
It’s not some immutable racial default, it’s the result of low sun exposure.
The Korean (and broader East Asian) pale skin thingThis isn’t some secret plot to “become white.” It’s ancient colorism tied to class. Pale skin meant you weren’t a peasant sweating in the rice fields. It signaled refinement, indoor life, higher status. Confucian hierarchy baked that in centuries ago. Today it’s a multi-billion-dollar brightening industry because the preference stuck culturally.
Same dynamic exists across Asia; India, China, Japan, Southeast Asia. Internal. Pre-colonial in many cases. Westerners love to flatten it into “they want to look like us” because it fits a simple oppressor/oppressed script. It doesn’t.
Americans and the skin-tone = race trap
Here’s where it gets especially stupid on this side of the Pacific. Americans are obsessed with skin color as the primary racial marker.
Light = white/privileged. Darker = POC/victim.
Everything else is noise. So when East Asians tan up, or show natural medium tones, or have skin that responds to the sun like normal human skin, the categories break and the cope begins.
“They’re not really tan, it’s just temporary.”
“Their natural state is pale, so they’re white-adjacent.”
“Colorism in Asia is because of Western influence.”
All lazy. Skin tone is one polygenic trait that’s highly responsive to environment. Populations have averages shaped by evolution (UV protection vs. vitamin D synthesis), but within every group there’s massive variation.
A pale indoor Korean and a tanned outdoor one are the same ancestry. A fair Italian and a pasty Swede are both “white” on paper but respond differently to sun.
Biology laughs at your checkboxes.
오늘만우절이아니라고?
“차준환은 극중 겉은 육각형 속은 생계형, 묘하게 감기는 여심저격 유죄인간 성대한을 연기한다.
잘생긴 얼굴 하나 믿고 우쭐하지만 정작 얼굴값은 못 하는 허당, 도끼병 말기로 외모 버프를 무기처럼 자주 이용한다. 넉살 좋고 능글맞은 성격으로 어딜 가나 인기가 많다.”