He trapped you all.
He didn't write these exec orders for nothing. lol.
He didn't tell the world in July that China placed Biden into office in 2020 for nothing.
He didn't put Mullen in front of cameras issuing an executive action to replace the foreign software in the machines for nothing.
He didn't insist they remove illegals from their voter rolls for nothing. Over 20 million between 2022 and 2024.
You're a fool. Keep gloating, Nazi.
@RepDonBacon You can take the British imperial system and shove it up your asshole. Along with the banks of London. Along with senior executive service. Along with Andy McCarthy.
@SenDuckworth lol. I doubt your new congress makes the finish line.
If there is wide scale fraud discovered; and confirmed before Jan, it won't happen. The buck will stop there on the corrupt machines, voter rolls, and illegal voters.
Speaking as a computer scientist...
Note also that the numbers you referenced aren't all just 64-35, they're all 64.6 + or - 0.2, and 35.4 + or - 0.2. That's even more unlikely.
This is what happens when you don't pay attention in math class. Likely some corrupt programmer put in a random factor that he thought would alter the numbers, without making it look like it altered the numbers. Like (brain-dead example) "If this ballot was for the opponent, and the random number generator is greater than 0.6, then change it.". But he didn't bother to do the math, or he would have realized that if you use whatever that random element is, over enough cases, then the result converges on 64.6 and 35.4.
At least if I was going to vet the program that did this, then that's what I'd most expect to find. This is a typical undergrad mistake. Just because your algorithm has a randomizing element, that doesn't mean that the result isn't going to converge, over a large enough number of trials.
Also note that this kind of manipulation almost always leaves a footprint in the data. Statisticians who specialize in analyzing voting results know what properties honest results should have. Unless the corrupt programmer really knew what he was doing, they'll spot the strange results, and the nature of the strangeness will give them a strong clue as to what the programmer did.
This man is a Computer Scientist and he looked at my post regarding California’s identical election results for top government positions
🚨 He CONFIRMS from a computer scientist programming perspective how the results ARE FROM AN ALGORITHM, NOT REAL VOTE TOTALS 👇 IT’S RIGGED
Here is the full list of ‘New valid voter registrations’ done nationwide between 2022-2024 WITHOUT ID
🚨 The total number of new voter registrations WITHOUT ID in 43 states is 24,662,998
California: 4,308,269 Texas: 2,900,357 North Carolina: 1,410,905 Florida: 1,337,303 Ohio: 1,198,459 Illinois: 981,482 Pennsylvania: 842,187 Georgia: 757,440 New York: 680,259 Tennessee: 634,912 Michigan: 604,606 South Carolina: 594,568 Alabama: 572,632 Virginia: 563,781 Maryland: 524,189 Colorado: 498,308 Washington: 473,192 Minnesota: 471,657 Massachusetts: 465,616 Missouri: 460,197 New Jersey: 425,782 Oklahoma: 388,669 Connecticut: 386,014 Indiana: 357,741 Mississippi: 344,991 Louisiana: 263,705 Arkansas: 246,974 Oregon: 240,611 Kentucky: 220,093 Kansas: 218,739 Idaho: 181,741 Nebraska: 164,491 Nevada: 145,494 New Mexico: 118,141 Iowa: 116,644 Maine: 106,978 Vermont: 81,993 Montana: 78,669 Delaware: 71,902 Hawaii: 64,468 West Virginia: 53,343 Rhode Island: 53,040 Alaska: 52,456
States: 43
Total new valid registrations without ID: 24,662,998
This is extremely suspicious since Democrats somehow materialized 20 million new voters….
It’s almost like they stacked the voter rolls with tens of millions of new voter registrations without ID or proof of citizenship and then used electronic voting machine algorithms to rig the results…..
WOAH 🚨 College campuses in Michigan were plastered everywhere with these ‘Vote for Abdul El-Sayed’ flyers
But this wasn’t organic, it was paid for by the Michigan Action Fund. If you look into their funding, THEIR LARGEST DONOR IS GEORGE SOROS
Foreign billionaire George Soros paid to have our college campuses plastered with flyers that tell people to vote for Abdul El-Sayed
The guy who ran on getting money out of politics is financially backed by Democrat’s largest donor
So yet again, it’s George Soros paying for the propaganda signs and flyers in America
HOLY CR*P 🚨 How is this even possible??
All of California’s major candidate election results are the EXACT SAME percentages for Democrats and Republicans
Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Lieutenant Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Secretary of State 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Controller 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Treasurer 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Attorney General 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Supreme Court Justice: Joshua Groban 72% (D) vs 28% (R)
Supreme Court Justice: Kelli M. Evans 72% (D) vs 28% (R)
These don’t look like real election results, they look like a computer algorithm
Our elections are fake
I’ve used multiple artificial intelligences to go through each state’s election results to see if there is another Democrat state that has identical results like California. They don’t, not even close
This makes California’s results even less likely. It’s undeniable algorithmic fraud
MIDTERM ELECTION FRAUD INDICATORS!
In the latest installment, a consistent mathematical pattern appears across 59 Senate and gubernatorial races.
Some are calling it the 85/15 algorithm.
It is quite OBVIOUS that algorithmic election manipulation rather than ordinary electoral swings has occured.
Here's how the algorithm works:
(or you can continue to believe in Communist miracles)
- 85% of Trump's 2024 vote share carries over to Republican candidates in 2026.
- 15% of Trump's 2024 vote share effectively shifts toward Democratic candidates.
- The pattern appears in both Republican and Democratic strongholds.
For example, if Trump received 60% of the vote in a state in 2024, the formula predicts that the Republican candidate would receive approximately 51% in 2026.
This is on top of 20 million votes that magically appeared out of thin air...... again..... and 100 percentile sweeps with a 1 in TRILLIONS odds of occurring.
So, what is being asked of you currently, by Democrats, their multi-billion dollar globalist deepstate propaganda machine and every Conservative grifter and globalist neocon power player, is to accept is this:
Their proposal to you is that the party that opened the borders and flooded the country with 10s of millions of illegal aliens, has fought ICE, fought deportations, fought Voter ID, fought purging corrupted voter rolls and every other attempt to secure elections, literally with threats of legal action and the help of SENATE RINOS.... WON a 1 in TRILLIONS miracle.
Well I call bullshit.
And not only that but they are going to try and overthrow the democratically elected President of the United States and attempt to destroy him and his family to cover it all up.
Just like last time.
They failed that time too.
Welcome to "color revolutions 101"
Weve already done this in history.
It ended in blood.
MIDTERM ELECTION FRAUD INDICATORS!
In the latest installment, a consistent mathematical pattern appears across 59 Senate and gubernatorial races.
Some are calling it the 85/15 algorithm.
It is quite OBVIOUS that algorithmic election manipulation rather than ordinary electoral swings has occured.
Here's how the algorithm works:
(or you can continue to believe in Communist miracles)
- 85% of Trump's 2024 vote share carries over to Republican candidates in 2026.
- 15% of Trump's 2024 vote share effectively shifts toward Democratic candidates.
- The pattern appears in both Republican and Democratic strongholds.
For example, if Trump received 60% of the vote in a state in 2024, the formula predicts that the Republican candidate would receive approximately 51% in 2026.
This is on top of 20 million votes that magically appeared out of thin air...... again..... and 100 percentile sweeps with a 1 in TRILLIONS odds of occurring.
So, what is being asked of you currently, by Democrats, their multi-billion dollar globalist deepstate propaganda machine and every Conservative grifter and globalist neocon power player, is to accept is this:
Their proposal to you is that the party that opened the borders and flooded the country with 10s of millions of illegal aliens, has fought ICE, fought deportations, fought Voter ID, fought purging corrupted voter rolls and every other attempt to secure elections, literally with threats of legal action and the help of SENATE RINOS.... WON a 1 in TRILLIONS miracle.
Well I call bullshit.
And not only that but they are going to try and overthrow the democratically elected President of the United States and attempt to destroy him and his family to cover it all up.
Just like last time.
They failed that time too.
Welcome to "color revolutions 101"
Weve already done this in history.
It ended in blood.
@andweknow Trump sets his presidential cap on the resolute desk, and picks up his commander in chief bonnet.
That's what will happen. Not maybe. It's just a matter of when.
What if it was a trap? What if they've been trapped? You're quick to defend the results without thinking about that.
Let's just start with the over 20 million illegal voters added to the roles between 2022 and 2024 alone.
Trump hasn't done everything he's done these last two years globally, and written all the executive orders that he's written about the elections dating back to 2018, just to meagerly walk away from this one.
Don't forget. Trump created space force. There's a faction of our government that has never had control of it. Purposely.
As a Canadian you're barking up the wrong tree.
For everyone sharing that graph, claiming 2026 midterms were stolen by fraud…
Appreciate what a double-edge sword that argument is.
Bottom line, it’s probably not fraud. 2026 midterm numbers are very commensurate with 2018 midterm numbers.
But even if it is the result of fraud: Republicans had the trifecta of power for nearly 2 years.
They ran on combatting election fraud.
If they did not do what they needed to do to make sure they were not the victims of the fraud they ran on combatting, they must also assume responsibility for that failure.