If you reject colonial rule because the British were outsiders, the same historical standard should be applied to the Mughal rulers who came from outside the Indian subcontinent.
#History#India#Mughals
Abdul and Fatima are Muslims, just like Palestinians, and Palestine is home to important Islamic religious sites.
Beyond religion, though, itโs basic humanity to feel sad about the suffering of innocent people.
Btw, what exactly do you people have in common with Israel that youโre so eager to bootlick it?
Eating animals is a basic human instinct. Humans have been doing it for thousands of years.
Even people in the Indus Valley Civilisation had meat-heavy diets, including beef.
When Muslim soldiers of Maratha Army cut down Huzuriyas, the elitest Maratha cavalry, led in person by the Peshwa.
All this for the life of a Hindu woman, against misogynistic notions of Manuwadi honour.
A 17-year-old Brahmin widow was being ritually burned (Sati). When she attempted to escape the funeral pyre, she was hacked into pieces.
The news of this atrocity somehow reached a nearby Muslim battalion (Aligol) serving in the Maratha forces. Outraged and disgusted, they seized the Brahmins responsible for the sati and cut off their braids, the traditional mark of Brahmin identity.
This brought them into conflict with the Huzuray, the elite cavalry unit, which objected to their actions.
A heated exchange of abuses followed.
Finally, Muslim soldiers then drew their swords, cut down a Huzuriya, and wounded several others. Seeing this, the crowd dispersed.
โโโ
Muslims stood for the right to live, against death.
This happened in 1843 CE.
Swara Bhaskar hasn't say anything wrong.
Is Rani Lakshmi bai did Johar due to fear ?
All Rajput queens who did Johar is absolutely coward.
Btw Alauddin Khilji was the only king who stop 5 times Mongol army to enter in India otherwise Bhakts have chinese face ๐๐คฃ
A lot of Manuwadis, especially women, here are justifying the immoral and barbaric practice of Jauhar in the name of "honour".
This is a very shameful and dangerous defence, because the Rajputs also commited mass female infanticide to uphold - "honour".
Jauhar, which is being defended under the same motion of honour and dignity, was no different from this at all, not even in ideological motivity - the fear of bringing dishonour to the clan.
The concern here was not even for the women or their personal dignity, but for the honour of the clan.
And therein lies the hypocrisy of Hindu men. While women were made to carry the burden of the clan's pride, men let themselves could be enslaved and trafficked across Central Asian and Arabian markets. What honour?
It was women, the more oppressed gender, whose very lives were treated as their personal property of Hindu men, to be bound to whatever notions of clan or caste honour they chose to uphold.
Fun facts:
Padmawat, a fictional story glorifying Rajput women burning themselves, was written by a Muslim poet Malik Muhamman Jayasi who was in Babur's darbar.
In the story, a Brahmin, Raghav Chetan told Khilji about Rajput queen Padmawati's beauty, encouraging him to wage war
Everyone is talking about Alauddin Khilji who was responsible for Jauhar but not a single sanatani criticise "RAGHAV CHETAN" a ponga Pandit of that time who was trying to watch Tapa Tap of Padmavati.
And he was the only person who told about Padmavathi to Khilji
Mughals ne bohat galat adat daal di inko har jagah naachne ki. Absolutely despicable and disgusting behaviour. Send these ugly Jeetas back to the slums๐คฎ