ICE has now set three straight months of record-breaking arrests, netting the highest totals in agency history.
Unlike previous admins, which focused on border crossers and select targets, Trump's ICE is detaining and deporting record numbers of illegal aliens from the interior.
Roughly 2,000 years before a Dem takes office again and roughly 200 years after the last Gazan is fed to dogs for TikTok likes.
I kid, of course. Assuming the deportation rate continues its present acceleration (and assuming 0 self deports), all non-Whites will be gone by 2060.
Lovecraft’s works are about how Anglo Christian society is a fragile blip in human history that could be overwhelmed by the unwashed hordes outside of it. (Lovecraft was Anglo-Saxon)
Howard’s works are about how the only way to save white society is for white people to drop polite Anglo civilization almost entirely and go monke. Basically Bronze Age Mindset 100 years before BAP. (Howard was Irish)
The past 250 years can be more or less accurately described as constant political, social, cultural, and technological revolutions making the previously unthinkable and everyday reality with new unthinkables every couple decades.
@jon_wunwun7 A major land war in Europe, bombing drug runners on boats, and reversing immigration were all more or less unthinkable even 15 years ago and now are actualities. Gay marriage, a browning West, and the effortless disintegration of communism were once unthinkable in OP's lifetime.
@jon_wunwun7 A major land war in Europe, bombing drug runners on boats, and reversing immigration were all more or less unthinkable even 15 years ago and now are actualities. Gay marriage, a browning West, and the effortless disintegration of communism were once unthinkable in OP's lifetime.
Because Liberalism as a concept has changed dramatically over time because of human actions and reasons and it did literally nothing. In so far as whatever liberalism is has sway, it is because people have sway.
I pushback so much because the Online Right horrifically misunderstands the transmission of history and of human events or what is powerful and what resonates with people.
This statement too made by Joshua is also completely insane and should be recognized as insane that even if what you were saying is true, an ethos did not do those things, an ethos is not responsible for those things, the men who championed it are responsible and they took the actions themselves.
Even if you were correct, they hold the main agency and the onus for holding that ethos in the first place. They were not possessed by the demon of liberalism which then guided their actions. They were extremely intelligent men who took specific actions for specific reasons.
And furthermore, why I push back so much is because this is all the end result of a game of Chinese whispers. It did not mean what these people said it means. And there were people along this game of Chinese whispers who, when it was their turn to transmit the message, deliberately decided to warp and subvert and insert their own message into the mix.
And what you have at the end of the analysis of this game of whispers is the establishment saying that this game actually went perfectly, and the message was transmitted without any flaws at all, or actually, the message got even better because of the changes, and that these changes were all inevitable, and you have the Online Right who basically agrees with them on this premise, but says "And thats why its bad and it always bad from the beginning!"
But I've heard enough of the original message, and I've seen enough of where specific people in this chain deliberately took actions and decided to change the message themselves, and it is so absurd to say it was just always fated to be transmitted that way and place most of the responsibility on guys who died hundreds of years ago, guys who, in fact, actually had a pretty great message that if you only knew what it was they had to say, you would agree with and probably already do far more than you realize.
But so many people, extremely popular thought leaders with audiences that far outstrip my own tell so many people these absurdities and agree with this ridiculous premise of pure determinism and that these people who deliberately chose to change the message actually did nothing at all and hold no responsibility, well its enough to drive you insane.
Especially, because what is lost in all of this, is that this transmission, this history, was not predetermined at some point in the past. It was a constant, repetitive action, a churning of generations making choices, the great men of each and every era, the actors both villains and heroes and where some prevailed and others did not, and that this is in fact how things work right now, even as we speak, that things can always be changed and actions can always be made and taken and that it is not and has never been some ridiculous dialectical deterministic chain driven by ideas as though concepts themselves have agency.
And the real reason why all of this ends up this way and so distorted, is because everyone thinks their thing is the real thing and the only thing. The people who are driven by talking about ideas and abstract philosophical concepts think ideas and abstract philosophical concepts are the thing which drives history and humanity itself? No way!
And so all it is is people. That's the actual basis and the origin of it. And even in so far as they adopt ideas, or an ethos, or an ideology, that too is driven most heavily by which people, which great men they resonate with. Because all of history is driven by men, great men in particular, and those heroes that they worship who came before them.
@thefoidda@GrantMa25066011 Which will likely be followed by more pro-Republican gerrymandering for 2028. Scotus defanging the VRA was basically the "give Republicans a permanent Congressional Majority" ruling. Which isn't quite as good as it sounds, but will improve once the useless Reps/Senators are gone.
Republicans will rule the world for the sake of White Evangelicals for the next thousand years. That means every single country in the Middle East not called Israel is probably getting glassed at some point in the near future. A small price to pay for owning the libs.
Not only that, but when the American public handed him a blank check to remake Asia into a parking lot in response to the attacks he blew it all on trying to get mohammedan girls into schools and letting their cousins into America. It's unbelievable Obama managed to outlib him.
“ICE is arresting more people than ever”, per Salon and NBC.
ICE has made record-breaking arrests in June, July and August, alongside a back-to-back rise in alien removals. Thanks to growing 287(g) agreements and quiet but expansive enforcement, mass deportations are ramping up.
Republicans have facts, Democrats have moral imperatives.
But their morals suck, put everyone in danger, and ruin society.
Republicans have to reclaim moral imperwtives, both in battle and rhetoric. It's not as hard as you think.
It doesn't have to be a hardline religious position. Everyone has made a cow out of "BEING HECKING LEFT ALONE MAN" and that has nothing to do with faith.
So, what are your imperatives? "Americans deserve safe streets free of drugged up foreigners" "Mass murderers belong in prison" "Normal people shouldn't be persecuted for wrongthink"
Stuff like that. Think of very normal, reasonable-sounding things that advance our politics. Avoid conversations about things we can't immediately fix. Focus on what's getting better.
More confirmation: 2028 is already decided, congratulations to Vance. The next steps are continuing Trump's work into the 2030s/40s, ensuring MAGA rule, and keeping a hold on influencing these movements and administrations.
Democratic primary for 2028:
Harris - 42% (+6 from July)
Newsom - 18% (-6)
AOC - 9%
Ossoff - 7%
Highest for Harris ever and she has more vote share than the next 5 candidates combined
My posts on White Evangelicals are basically predictions that they are going or have already won this struggle and that the rest of the Right should develop strategies for currying favor with this voting bloc. I think the smartest people here are already moving in that direction.
It's also that the different members of the coalition that destroyed the left must now compete for dominance in the wake of victory. The winner gets to rule the world and the losers get to play second fiddle forever, so we can expect this bickering to worsen in the near future.
The reason this stuff pisses me off so much is that it is nakedly transparent that the people pushing this have no principles while larping as wholesome chungus moral man number 7.
Whenever the subject of the 2028 primary comes up, these types will moan and whine that we NEED a primary. We can't just coronate Vance! (No one is arguing for a coronation by the way, this is a talking point cooked up by famous anti-Trumper Phil Magness and repeated by the retarded and gullible, but that's a seperate topic that warrants discussion for another time) I don't even disagree with a 2028 primary. I just think it would be unproductive use of resources listening to candidates who don't stand a real chance, but we should still have one.
The issue is that whenever these people's preferred candidate loses, like John Conryn (Spent 100 million dollars and lost by 27 points. LOL! LMAO!), they moan and whine about the results! I thought you guys liked primaries? Well, you got them! What's the big deal?
The true issue, is that these people who drone on about the marketplace of ideas, actually hate the marketplace of ideas once it tells them to fuck off. They don't want a marketplace of ideas. They want to larp and pretend there is a neutral and impartial system that gives them legitimacy while having uncontested authority, because there is never a truly neutral system. Someone, somewhere is always going to put their hand on the scale. They're just mad it is Trump's hand and not their own anymore.