Clinging to the phrase "a woman is anyone who identifies as a woman" is to tacitly admit that you can think of nothing that trans women share in common with natal females.
Again, what are you not understanding
Things that are true by definition or inherent properties of something are not things to be cited. As noted: you are simply repeating by rote things you do not understand.
An aside: why is it that each of you freaks think "no u" is the height of wit? Nevermind the fact that it is plainly false - one has repeatedly explained a consistent epistemology to you that you have not grasped - getting all upset and trying a school yard level rhetorical gambit does not answer what was asked of you: what are you fucking asking for?
You really don't understand what you're trying here and are getting increasingly emotionally dysregulated
@404tvofficial@meoww739 As noted: you are talking nonsense, you are simpky repeating by rote something you inagine to be profound, but is in fact idiotic.
The observations are not statistical but qualitative on the basis of definition.
It's the cargo cult at it again:
There are things that are correct and thus because they were counter-intuitive it was a mark of sophistication to believe or at least signal you believe/understand - evolution, quantum mechanics, etc.
This is now a hallmark of libtard and progressivism - counter-intuitive things are inherently sophisticated.
And thus.
Spellcasting is enabled by the natural inclination to be intellectually charitable to your interlocutor.
It is incredibly difficult to "unlearn" as they say. The phenomenon runs exactly parallel to that of interacting with a person with borderline personality disorder. The trap that people fall into is trying to find the unifying underlying reasoning for BPD behaviour and then addressing that, convincing and solving the behaviour or at least understanding the BPD in future. It is a source of ever growing source of stress and disappointment where the victim gets stuck in ever more elaborate and self destructive loops to try and manage the BPD.
But there is no unifying principle beneath their behaviour, it is an alien and incomprehensible horror to realise this.
It is not novel observe that progressivism is the Cluster B Disorder applied to politics. But it is worth underlying that the entire political process of engaging with progressives as if they were rational actors deranges politics on a purely procedural level.
Part of the explanation people believe that is there is an instinctive reaction against Trump, that right thinking politicians are required by forces outside their control to pursue rhetoric and policies viewed as "anti-Trump"
That Trump's mere presence in the world stage understaffed deranged politics everywhere.
Ignore the fact that "They called Mitt Romney a far right nazi" is a reflection of a general principle worldwide.
This is, yet another, example of the phenomenon where both libtards and progressive explanations and justifications are WORSE than the accusation leveled against them.
"Well you see, these people can be irrationally deranged by optics rather than content and will work against your interests for PR victories" means they are irrational and unfit to rule!
It happens with their excesses of covid, their defense of brown, black or female criminals, of Lindsay Clancy and women, defenses of choosing the bear, and so forth.
And one you see it you cannot stop seeing it. As you say, these people are spellcasters or automations animated by cast spells, and it's massively difficult to fully recognise and internalise this fact. But the reason they cannot understand second and third order effrcts id because they are casting spells, not making arguments, not expressing their beliefs and reasoning.