@charles2ofspain@alex_kirshner Not attacking you specifically, just saying this isnt something we havent seen from several other coaches, GMs, and owners before
@charles2ofspain@alex_kirshner The whole "second chances" thing is just coach deflection for signing players that other franchises wont over character or legal issues. Its not unique to Reid and he isnt anymore sincere than anyone else, and the rubes of every fanbase lap it up
@jonkmbz@alex_kirshner@thelatinochild I was gonna boldly declare that no one was under the illusion that Andy Reid was a good person but then I opened the comments and saw this, thanks for saving me bro
@ShamebyJames2 https://t.co/Y74MZ5AtyZ
Have you considered that Hitler had trauma and some good ideas? No? Thats because you're not allowed to talk about Hitler in the West
A key difference, I think, is in America you can log onto Twitter without a VPN and post that Washington was a slave owner and if the post goes viral the government wont shut down the internet.
I know a lot of people in the West are baffled by the Mbappé-Mao storm in China - which in itself shows that Mbappé's ignorance doesn't come out of nowhere...
To understand it, here's the best analogy I could think of: imagine the biggest Chinese star in the NBA, with sponsorship deals all over the US. One day he's asked for his favorite meme of himself. He giggles: "the one where they put my face on some guy, I think he was an American slave owner." When the "some guy" in question is George Washington.
Whatever you think of the label, you know exactly how that would land in the US: an ungrateful foreigner getting rich off Americans, laughing at the country's founding father in an offensive way - at least to a big share of the population - without even knowing his name.
A founding father is the story a nation tells itself about where it comes from. Laugh at him as a foreigner while cashing in on that nation's consumers, and that's not going to go well in any country.
The label is also extremely un-nuanced: yes, all important historical figures have their share of darkness and Washington and Mao are no exception.
China actually recognizes this: the official line is that he was "70% right and 30% wrong," and the Party's 1981 resolution condemned how his "personal arbitrariness gradually undermined democratic centralism in Party life and the personality cult grew graver and graver" (https://t.co/gH2rs1FZqW)
Same for Washington: it's officially acknowledged too. Or at least it was until this year: in January, the National Park Service tore down an exhibit in Philadelphia about the people Washington enslaved there, under a Trump executive order targeting content that "inappropriately disparage[s]" Americans (https://t.co/MRLTnnllfq). Which goes to show China isn't uniquely touchy about its founding father...
@facetedcarapace I work in a leadership role in field thats mostly women, and the temperature change when someone gets the boss at the demand of an irate 'customer' and the customer sees a dude walk out instead of a woman is palpable