north

[north @north2184]

@TrueBurna Swords dance KG?

[north @north2184]

@DeLos11747 @DubiousBulb1033 Same same same. Only match up I feel at a disadvantage.

[north @north2184]

@mariruripokemo2 I use the same team but struggle vs Rain (Swampert, Archaludon). What is your strategy for this matchup?

[north @north2184]

@Castillo11VGC Using this team and it's great. I really struggle v Archaludon though. Find it hard to preserve Sneasler. And for Blastoise to OHKO it needs shell smash, full health, rain, helping hand from Incin.

How do you handle rain teams with Archaludon?

[north @north2184]

@tradermatt 5 days after posting $16 😑

[north @north2184]

@DonAlt Good troll. It’s a logic test, not a Keynsian Beauty Contest.

[north @north2184]

@cryptoklotz Building a portfolio of 90% btc 10% hype this year during the bear and not touching outperforms most next cycle imo.

[north @north2184]

@Trader_XO @r2_pete Thanks. I signed up early. No mention of Moonbeeg originally, is that a requirement? Can register if so.

[north @north2184]

@blockchainedbb So you think we’ve bottomed based on that chart?

[north @north2184]

@HashtagHumboldt @gumsays Then you’re in profit. Enjoy! TP some if nervous.

[north @north2184]

@gumsays Great perspective

[north @north2184]

@Bardstocks The same will eventually happen to MadLads.

[north @north2184]

@Trader_XO @Crypto_Chase This is crazy.

[Tracy Shuchart (𝒞𝒽𝒾 ) @chigrl]

The reason nobody is sure why BTC is pulling back is because everyone is looking for a single cause when this is actually a systems failure with multiple transmission mechanisms reinforcing each other.

Here's what actually happened mechanistically:
Bitcoin ran from $40,000 to $126,000 in less than a year on a very specific narrative: Federal Reserve easing cycle plus institutional adoption through ETFs equals sustained bull market. The market built up $94 billion in futures open interest, with some platforms offering leverage ratios as high as 1,001 to 1. That setup alone created extraordinary fragility.

The trigger was simple but devastating. Fed officials reversed dovish expectations completely. The market went from pricing a 90 percent probability of December rate cuts to just 40 percent. Real yields on short term Treasuries stayed elevated above 5 percent. The entire macro story that justified Bitcoin at $126,000 collapsed in a matter of weeks.

Now here's where the structural vulnerability shows up. The new ETF infrastructure that everyone celebrated as bringing institutional money actually created institutional scale sell liquidity that never existed before. When the macro narrative broke, institutions could exit with one click. We saw $1.1 billion in ETF outflows in just days. This isn't retail panic selling. This is professional portfolio managers rebalancing away from an asset whose fundamental thesis just evaporated.

Simultaneously, long term holders who bought Bitcoin between $40,000 and $80,000 started distributing. They offloaded 815,000 Bitcoin in 30 days. These holders aren't selling because they think Bitcoin is worthless. They're selling because they see volatility ahead and they're sitting on 50 to 150 percent profits. Smart money doesn't ride drawdowns when they can step aside and rebuy lower with the same capital.

Here's where it becomes a cascade. When price broke the $100,000 support level, technical stops triggered across the entire derivatives complex. Over $20 billion in leveraged positions got liquidated throughout October and November. Some single day events saw $3.2 billion wiped out. The liquidations themselves created additional selling pressure, which triggered more stops, which forced more liquidations. Open interest collapsed from $94 billion to $68 billion, but there's probably still more leverage that needs to clear.

The critical insight everyone is missing: there are no natural buyers at these price levels. Institutions are rebalancing away from risk assets. Long term holders are waiting for lower prices to rebuy. Retail got scared off by the violence of the move. And new buyers won't step in until the leverage gets fully flushed and price stabilizes.

So the market has to fall far enough to accomplish three things. Clear the remaining leverage completely. Reach prices where long term holders stop distributing and start accumulating again. Find the level where actual value buyers with real capital see opportunity worth the volatility risk.

The $600 billion wipeout you're seeing is mostly the evaporation of unrealized gains that were paper wealth to begin with. When Bitcoin went from $40,000 to $126,000, that represented about $1.7 trillion added to market cap. A lot of that was pure multiple expansion based on a macro narrative that turned out to be wrong. Now the market is repricing based on reality: high real yields, no Fed easing, strong dollar environment.

This isn't mysterious. It's textbook deleveraging dynamics in an asset with no cash flows to anchor valuation, extreme leverage ratios, and a macro thesis that broke. A 25 percent correction after a 215 percent rally with 1,000x leverage in the system is actually normal market behavior when the fundamental story changes. The violence of the move reflects the amount of leverage that was built up, not any change in Bitcoin's long term prospects.

The real question isn't why did this happen. The real question is what price level actually clears the market and brings in genuine buyers rather than leveraged speculators. That's still being discovered.

[north @north2184]

@retiredchaddev @hylo_so Is this as simple as swapping hyUSD for sHYUSD and earning that sweet, sweet 13%?

[north @north2184]

@swombat Generally found it all fine for Hollow Knight. For Silksong I got too frustrated and quit a third way through. Watched videos of later game and just knew it would be far too annoying.

[north @north2184]

@loopify Facts.

[north @north2184]

@gumsays So fucking tiring

[north @north2184]

@CryptoParadyme Same. Was accepting of 116k this weekend.