I don’t know why but @ComicDaveSmith ! I am on 15g of shrooms right now and have the urge to tell you how entertaining your absolute destruction of @JackPosobiec is! I just powered through the back and forth on X😂🍄 Also your wife’s kids book rocks!
Turning Point USA takes all threats seriously and we work closely with law enforcement at all levels to respond to and resolve any threats.
We are grateful to the San Antonio Police Department and the FBI for their rapid response and arrest of the individual making these threats.
The safety of our attendees, speakers, and staff is always our top priority. All TPUSA events include enhanced, multi-layered security measures that are enforced by both private security and local police.
We refuse to let threats silence us. We look forward to a successful and inspiring gathering June 5–7 in San Antonio for 2,500+ ladies attending the Women's Leadership Summit!
https://t.co/kULgwJQ5Ev
Today, a CIA whistleblower sat before my committee and confirmed what I've said for years: government officials, including Dr. Fauci, deliberately misled the American people about the origins of COVID-19. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is sworn testimony. 🧵
@TheProjectUnity You had the opportunity to ask him literally anything, to call him out on his lies and deception LIVE in front of a massive international audience, and chose not to? And you’re instead posting gloating about sitting out? That’s no W 🤷🏼♂️
I have CONFIRMED Tyler Robinson WAS in custody at the Washington County Sheriff's Office at 6:50p on September 11, 2025.
You may post your apologies below.
I'm eager to hear all about how it's normal for people to post confessions to Discord AFTER they are in custody.
Nobody is reading all that shit, you are still on the wrong side of this, just fade away into the abyss like everyone else who failed at trying to manipulate Americans in the last 10 years. Maybe go but an island, seems like you are the type to own a island
The video is Prime Candace. Every manipulative rhetorical technique in the books.
She makes roughly 236 claims in roughly 30 minutes in what is probably one of the most concise examples of a Gish gallop I have ever seen. A Gish gallop is firing off so many claims in rapid succession your opponent can’t possibly address them all. Even if every claim is wrong, the preponderance of false claims produces the impression of a devastating case.
Coupled with Brandolini’s Law, which posits that the amount of energy needed to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than that needed to produce it.
The whole process is meant to make the accused look crazy for even trying.
Candace uses rhetorical sleight of hand to accuse me of accusing her husband of lying on his immigration documents.
I might respond that I’ve never made any such claim.
But Candace has already suggested I’m working with Laura Loomer to launder the accusation against her.
I might respond that I haven’t spoken privately to Laura Loomer in years.
But Candace has already moved on to say that I’m coordinating with Ben Shapiro to launder ideas to Laura Loomer.
So I might respond that I haven’t spoken to Ben Shapiro in over a year, other than a single text exchange when Charlie died.
But Candace has already moved on to calling me a creep.
Each of my responses, by the way, will be immediately attacked in its own right. Candace’s audience will insist her accusation is true, even though she has offered no proof, and will likewise demand I provide proof of my counter claim. Asymmetric skepticism and burden shifting.
I will not be able to prove that I didn’t make a claim, because one cannot prove a negative. Sure, they won’t be able to show any proof that I did make such a claim, but no burden of proof applies to them.
Show us your texts! You must have deleted the texts! You had a stupid haircut as a child!
The over 200 accusations scale with your answers. Answering one doesn't drop the total to 235 – it scales it up exponentially, because your answer becomes the source of a new onslaught of charges from Candace and her legion.
Pretty soon, not only is the sheer number of accusations condemning, but the sheer number of accusers becomes proof that Candace is winning! Vox populi, vox Dei!
Trying to defend yourself against such madness is madness. It’s like trying to nail Jello to a wall.
You might think there is one claim I simply have to address: That a Daily Wire employee was arrested for sex crimes involving a minor.
But while that accusation is terrible, it has nothing to do with me. As the document Candace posted makes clear, this person was arrested in May of 2025. I left the company in March of 2025. Whatever actions the company did or didn’t take when it learned of the situation, I was not a part of it.
To be honest, I’m not actually sure what Candace is accusing me of, other than her deeply twisted statement that “people who support Israel will also protect the Epstein class of pedophiles.”
Protect how?
What exactly am I being accused of? I would ask Candace to state her allegations clearly and specifically. Otherwise, I choose door number three.
By the way, if you employ enough people, you will inevitably employ some terrible ones. Hell, I once employed Candace Owens! Employees are people. If you have enough of them, you have all of the different kinds of people there are. Some will even be criminals, and you will have to fire them, which is what I’m guessing the Daily Wire did in this case.
Other than that, I have nothing to say to Candace. She invited me to come on her show to talk about George, but I have nothing to say about George at all. She invited me to talk about this person she says committed this terrible crime, but an hour of “Have you stopped beating your wife,” guilt-by-association slander isn’t my idea of a good time.
And I may not be the smartest person in media, but I’m just sophisticated enough to know you can’t have a good-faith conversation with someone who uses rhetoric in such dishonest ways. Candace doesn’t want to talk; she wants to overwhelm me with so many allegations and insinuations, so much projection and presupposition and false consensus signaling that her audience builds a negative narrative about me – whatever negative narrative sticks!
I see no reason to engage in that kind of spectacle.
Also, my audience is rightly concerned for my safety if I go to Candace’s studio.
It just hit me pretty hard again, we really won’t ever get to see @charliekirk11 shitting on some entitled college students, and his wife is just parading her ignorance and burning his legacy to the ground for Israel. You did not deserve a man like Charlie, he deserved better!
@america That's it?
Unless these discoveries are followed by Old Testament personal accountability, the fraud will continue
We are losing probably more than a trillion dollars a year and without a 23 year old Youtuber, this wouldn't even be happening