Anything Trump touches turns into dirt! Allowing India - Russia - China alliance, strengthening BRICS and losing USD trading currency hold (say 90% to 50% catastrophic as US has 40 TRILLION DEBT) will be Trump’s biggest blunder!
Well, he does not care! And MAGA and America will be holding the bag for decades to come!
Ali - immature comment - art need not mix with politics
Aaamir - dumb comment!
Sonali - the best rebuttal to both, you can express via art you know but there is no way you can be expert in many political subjects - specially actors most of them were not good students or dropouts!
For four thousand years, the Indian subcontinent was the centre of world trade. Sumerian tablets record Indian ships reaching Mesopotamia in the third millennium BC. Rome ran a permanent trade deficit with India. By 1600, Surat was the richest port on earth.
Then, within a single lifetime, India lost its maritime supremacy almost entirely.
The conventional explanation is that Europe arrived with superior ships and weapons. It is a comforting story and it is largely wrong. The deeper cause was internal.
Indian commerce was extraordinarily sophisticated. Surat's leading merchant, the Jain financier Virji Vora, was reputedly the richest man in the world; the East India Company borrowed from him. Merchants of every religion and origin traded together because the system rested on two foundations: religious toleration, established by Akbar, and predictable, low-tariffs. Customs duties were around five per cent. Contracts were honoured. Trust was the real currency.
There was one structural weakness. In Venice, Amsterdam and London, the state and the merchant class shared an interest in trade and invested in it together. In Mughal India, the ruling elite was indifferent to commerce. Merchants financed the state; the state never encouraged merchants.
When Aurangzeb became hostile, merchants had no protection. Religious toleration was abandoned. Temples were destroyed, punitive taxes on non-Muslims reimposed, the Sikh Guru executed. Forty years of war followed. East India Company imports from India fell ninety per cent in seven years. Eight thousand merchants abandoned Surat in a single exodus.
They relocated, many of them to an insignificant island Britain had received as a royal wedding dowry, because it offered the security and toleration the Mughal state had destroyed. It also offered English Common Law. Within a generation Bombay was the commercial capital of India. The Wadia family built the Royal Navy's finest ships there. The Tata dynasty traces its origins to this migration.
Europe did not defeat Indian commerce. It inherited it, by providing the conditions Indian merchants needed and their own rulers had thrown away.
This is not an argument about colonialism. It is an argument about something more fundamental, and it is the thread running through all three of my books on maritime trade. The second ‘The Millennium Maritime Trade Revolution’ is subtitled ‘How Asia Lost Maritime Supremacy.’ It is hardly ever lost to a stronger rival but when a society stops valuing the openness, toleration and commercial purpose that made it great. Portugal did it. The Dutch Republic did it. Britain, in the 20th century, did it too.
The conditions of prosperity are always a choice. And they can be unmade by a single generation that comes to value something else more.
Link to the full Substack essay with sources is below.
Dumb ass Pai, they (people who had already contributed to non profit were first in line) had the opportunity to convert that into for profit when the Cap tables opened in 2019 but your dumb ass management had zero clue and did not invest!!!!!
What a fucking lair! I, Nandan, and murthy are stuck BODY SHOP mentality no maturity rascals!
Indians are not "one of the lowest" beneficiaries of US government benefits, they are THE LOWEST beneficiaries per capita of government benefits.
Indians are not "one of the biggest" net tax contributors in the US economy, they are THE BIGGEST tax contributors in the US economy.
India has sent 96 people to America who started billion dollar companies. No one else is even close.
There's only about 5 million Indians in America. Almost one in 50,000 of them is a unicorn founder!
What a holy, special, beautiful people.
I will always fight for them.
This new research on US unicorn startups is really interesting.
Some key facts from the report:
1. Immigrants founded or cofounded 455 of America’s 775 privately held billion-dollar startups, equal to 59% of all US unicorns.
2. 66% of all US unicorns were founded or cofounded by immigrants or the children of immigrants.
3. 79% of US unicorns have either an immigrant founder or an immigrant in a key leadership role.
4. The 455 immigrant-founded US unicorns have a combined valuation of $5 trillion.
5. That $5 trillion valuation is larger than the total stock-market value of companies listed in all but 7 countries.
6. Including immigrant-founded unicorns that went public since 2016 pushes the total value above $5.8 trillion.
7. The number of immigrant-founded US unicorns rose from 50 in 2018 to 455 in 2026.
8. 24% of US unicorns have a founder who first came to America as an international student.
@me_ganesh14 No you dumb ass, he is not in the league of Lalu or Mamatha who ruled like gunda Raj! He handled finance and was decent administrator! He was an average CM! There were some really super corrupt ones like Bangarappa, Yedi etc