notpinescript

Pinescript sucks. We don't care if you're a quant, you deserve quality testing. Get a free quote today.

[notpinescript @notpinescript]

Same strategy. Same system. Different results. This isn't a coincidence. Pinescript sucks, retail doesn't realize it. A thread. 🧵

[notpinescript @notpinescript]

@PolySocketDev https://t.co/iv5YO6YkiF for stocks, data bento for futures.

[notpinescript @notpinescript]

I ran a strategy through TradingView.

Then I ran it on real tick data.

Same strategy. Same date range. Different data. Better code. Choose notpinescript.

[notpinescript @notpinescript]

@JR71196338 There was no lookahead bias.

[notpinescript @notpinescript]

@JR71196338 Which code? The pinescript? I don't have direct access but I could request it and send it to you.

[notpinescript @notpinescript]

@wepx Not true. Every quant realizes pine script sucks. Those fixes reduce result inflammation, they don't fix it.

[notpinescript @notpinescript]

@JR71196338 The first number is the result of a simple MA crossover. The second is that same result, properly tested.

[notpinescript @notpinescript]

We don't have that issue. Choose notpinescript. Deploy with confidence.

[notpinescript @notpinescript]

Same strategy. Same system. Different results. This isn't a coincidence. Pinescript sucks, retail doesn't realize it. A thread. 🧵

[notpinescript @notpinescript]

TradingView results are greatly inflated. Seriously think you'll see this much profit in such a short period?