Anounymous

@NounsDAO observer. Just some personal opinions.

[Anounymous @nounymous]

Fascinated by the self-sustaining ecosystem approach of @nounsdao , I delved into the community by joining some of the most prominent NounsDAO Discord servers and followed leading Noun holders on Twitter.

After observing for 2 weeks, here are my thoughts:

[Marry Evan @marryevan999]

My Boyfriend asked why I was smiling at 4 AM.

Showed his the terminal.

"What are all those green numbers?"

$1,129. Made while he slept.

"Doing what?"

Nothing. Claude scanned 14,000 wallets, found 47 that never lose, built a bot that copies them.

He watched for 10 seconds:

+$3.87 captured
+$6.42 captured
+$12.71 captured

"It just keeps going?"

Every few seconds. New line. New money.

"How much did you start with?"

$300. Now $1,429. Eleven hours. Asleep.

"What does it do?"

Buys at $0.48. Sells at $0.52. Pockets $0.04. Who wins doesn't matter.

"That's legal?"

Citadel does this on NYSE daily. 400 engineers. I have one screen.

He looked at the P&L curve. Never dips. Just climbs.

"Can you make me one?"

Setting hers up now.

He still doesn't get how it works.

The bot doesn't care.

You only need Claude + laptop + 1 hour/day.

Giving This Free for 24 hours. To get it:

1. Comment the word 'Claude'
2. Like and Retweet this post
3. Follow me @marryevan999 (so i can DM you)

[vitalik.eth @VitalikButerin]

It will significantly increase my opinion of @Anthropic if they do not back down, and honorably eat the consequences.

(For those who are not aware, so far they have been maintaining the two red lines of "no fully autonomous weapons" and "no mass surveillance of Americans". Actually a very conservative and limited posture, it's not even anti-military.

IMO fully autonomous weapons and mass privacy violation are two things we all want less of, so in my ideal world anyone working on those things gets access to the same open-weights LLMs as everyone else, and exactly nothing on top of that. Of course we won't get anywhere close to that world, but if we get even 10% closer to that world that's good, and if we get 10% further that's bad)

CC @DarioAmodei
https://t.co/RSzHnXqWFL

[Anounymous @nounymous]

@lialiascg Point

[Anounymous @nounymous]

@VitalikButerin @60r90 @aztecnetwork Cool

[Anounymous @nounymous]

@Jaxweah Send

[Anounymous @nounymous]

What’s new in NounsDAO?

[Anounymous @nounymous]

@punk4156 @SloppyPencil I personally think Nouns have enough props and contents from the animation industry. Time to explore other industries.

[Anounymous @nounymous]

@onnnnnnnion True haha

[Anounymous @nounymous]

@WideEyeKarI @nounsdao I like that there’s a revised/upgraded prop. But I don’t think this is the prop that’s going to attract new audience. Web3 doesn’t really hold a positive image towards general audience in China. A playground has different target audience.

[Anounymous @nounymous]

@noun12LFG @lilnounsdao @0xSVG I agree

[Anounymous @nounymous]

@fabioseva If the founder keeps voting yes to overcharging props, the treasury will get drained before either one happens lol

[Anounymous @nounymous]

Most NounsDAO props have been a marketing prop, targeting mostly audiences who can’t afford a Noun or care about the web3 spaces. But then there’s almost no fitting product for all the effort. Just void marketing.

[Anounymous @nounymous]

@cawlseason 4156? But I understand. Better some props than no prop I guess.

[Anounymous @nounymous]

Also 413 is about to become another ridiculous one. Fund some marketing team 3M in total for 1.5 years of mediocre work?

[Anounymous @nounymous]

@cawlseason @0Hindsight 398, 397, 394

I don’t have issue with those artists. My main issue is the overcharging and under delivery history.

As for the burn, I think it makes it even harder for new comers to join the DAO. And the DAO will eventually just become a couple group’s game.

[Anounymous @nounymous]

Prop 413 has passed, as I anticipated. Tbh, had it failed, I might still have had some faith in Nouns. But it seems the DAO has transformed into an even easier money pool. No wonder so many long-term believers forked away. In retrospect, I regret not joining them, officially.

[Anounymous @nounymous]

@cawlseason Ahh well the new one passed lol. They are definitely one of those groups that’s been exploiting the DAO the most…

[Anounymous @nounymous]

@stevefink Same

[Anounymous @nounymous]

@fabioseva @punk4156 Cool stuff

[Anounymous @nounymous]

@cawlseason @0Hindsight 398, 397, 394

I don’t have issue with those artists. My main issue is the overcharging and under delivery history.

As for the burn, I think it makes it even harder for new comers to join the DAO. And the DAO will eventually just become a couple group’s game.

[Anounymous @nounymous]

There’s no better time to exploit NounsDAO, whether you are a “builder” or you are joining to fork.

Props with unrealistic asks are coming through and passing. After a while, no prop will pass because people realize too much money are being scammed.

Sounds familiar?

[Anounymous @nounymous]

@cawlseason @0Hindsight Before the fork or after?