GodIsAble

Stay busy, stay focused, stay hungry. Prove them wrong 🫡-no excuses.

[GodIsAble @nova_nyla]

I saw an article saying xavi xparte was the favourite over Cancelo. I wonder what kind of football people watch the football we watch or understand what we see on the pitch without a word from the manager.

Cancelo is the favourite in that position and brings something both balde and the kid doesn’t give us. He has superior attacking threat than all of them who can slap shots from within and out of the box and who has also send those balls in there. And those two lads don’t have those qualities including xavi. What flick is doing is resting him when it matters using the rotation. The season is long.

Why do you think Cancelo is the one being used in big games except for today’s big game. Watch again psg match just like you saw in the other champions league games and watch again against Madrid who will play!!!!and he was not used today cos we need that rest as that game against psg is going to be busy in the wings. Xavi is not the player we used in those games. Those are high level matches and with those experienced forwards and big stakes games Cancelo gives Barca a lot of amo. Hence he is the top dog in big games and that tells you that he is the guy for that wing. The coach is being smart. He is not stretching his options and if it is game we have a chance to easily beat why not allow the kid to play who can do a decent job than using Cancelo all the time???????? And risk injuries for your top dogs when you have options?

I don’t get it how most people don’t understand what is going on by observing trends.

[GodIsAble @nova_nyla]

And grown ass Cowards and boxos can not even push back in anything or even ask Eazy to be on here!!!

It is sad.

Surf is the stupid kid who gives the appearance of competence but he is not and most have been fooled by him!!!!

He is saying his side but have you tried to ask Eazy ?

[GodIsAble @nova_nyla]

And surf slaves are busy trying so hard to distract from the bombshell on the crime child who is their master.

He was talking shit on spaces about someone who knows him way more than we do.

He had a right t stash up for himself.

Now the lame, averaged microwaved brained dudus are trying so hard to cover his nakedness.

They are so in denial and it is pathetic.

I am a mook fan but u saw everyone talking shit on eazy surf lately and now he gave him what is even bigger than any subjective loss and you are mad

[GodIsAble @nova_nyla]

@Tsu_Surf @Eazyblockcapt @urltv

Eazy the Block Captain recently dropped a bombshell response aimed at Tsu Surf amid the ongoing Remy Ma and Papoose drama. I watched a podcast with Mike P, who comes across as genuine, honest, and objective.
The host seemed to be trying to corner him, but Mike P was straightforward: Eazy didn't want to do this, but if Surf keeps putting dirt on his name and talking about him the way he has, bringing up skeletons
in the closet, then it forces Eazy's hand. That's a natural reaction, especially when you're being mocked and ridiculed by someone you helped with your talent.

Eazy has been respectful toward Surf since he came home and hasn't spoken badly about him. Surf, on the other hand, has been cocky and running his mouth about Eazy. Surf is a crime child who recently
came home from prison, was involved in gangs, and has sold drugs (poison) to people. He's not as talented as the hype and glazing make him out to be. He never really had three full rounds and was
choking in performances many times. Things suddenly shifted when the titles assembled. Is this really the guy everyone was glazing as the one who would save the culture and who wants 250?

Eazy is an insider. He's well-spoken, measured, and intentional when he speaks. He takes accountability. The craziest thing is hearing a receipt from a man who was in the same group and knows
things the rest of us don't, someone who, without rambling, takes responsibility for some of Surf's run of performances. Boldy… what does that mean? Do we think he was high, or is he so
dull or a liar that he'd make that bold a statement?

The "crime" Eazy committed, in the eyes of some, was leaving URL and dating Remy. Any of those guys would date Remy in a heartbeat. She's one of the biggest names in hip-hop in the U.S.
and the world. Remember that. He left the URL crab mold, and now he's in a better position than he was. He has his own league, he's trending, and he's doing his thing. Love him or hate him for
the envious, biased, and unfounded sentiments, the guy is doing okay.

I'm Black, and I understand my people. Nobody is better at destroying the Black man than the Black man. We get jealous and envious of each other. This guy came from nowhere,
became one of the top three faces of URL (even with the crazy teeth before the braces), left them where he met them, and ended up dating Remy. He worked on himself, went to the gym,
got his teeth fixed, and now he's standing on his own. That's the crime he committed. Who is he? How come he's the one who got Remy? We've been here as slaves at URL. Why would he leave?

Surf gives the impression of competence and excellence, but in substance he's not that guy. He's used his mouth to reinforce that impression to the point where a lot of "walking on eggshells"
people won't call him out even when he doesn't pay their bills. Mike P is a standup dude. The groupthink and follow-the-crowd mentality is real. Surf started talking and belittling Eazy since
he came home, all the way up to his last battle, and now Eazy has responded. These guys can't comfortably condemn Surf for being the instigator all this time?

They want to talk about friendship when the very guy is dissing him, and Eazy should cover his ass? Now people want to divert and make Surf the victim when Eazy has been pressed for months by him.
Like Mike P said, the "we do that for each other as friends" line is a manipulative attempt to make it look like, "Hey, we're all in this, and it's not like he wrote for me, just advice, hahaha."
Mike P is smart, and I thought I was the only one who caught the deflection and water-down tactic in that statement. You have to have a clear head to read into all of this.

They've been poking this guy for months. Any battle people thought he might have lost since he left URL was judged through the Remy angle. Now he's responding, and they want to keep him oppressed and
subdued when they don't pay his bills. Most of you can't even say the truth because you can't think for yourselves. You hate Eazy based on what others said and think.

People date people every day. Most of these dudes have killed people, sold drugs that poison people, been involved in robbery and crimes, stolen, slept with other people's wives or their homies' girlfriends,
or even underage kids and taken advantage of people. What did Eazy do that's new? These things happen every day in our society. The loudest voices are often the most corrupt and hypocritical. We see it daily with celebrities. Is it strange?

These guys became more jealous, envious, and hateful, and kept talking about that relationship. That may have been part of why they parted ways. Now they're no longer together, Pap is with another woman,
and no one is talking about it, partly because he's also married, and a lot may have been happening that we don't even know about, which is why Remy found comfort in Eazy. These hateful people destroyed it.
Because none of them ever had Remy's name, followers, fame, or status, Eazy shouldn't be making headlines out of nowhere. They had one mission: bring him back to the crab bucket like the rest of us
and keep him the same. That's typical Black people behavior.

Mind you, rumors of ghostwriting about Surf have been around for a long time, and even Lux mentioned being approached by Surf. Eazy was in a circle that went bananas when he left the slave master club, and he knows that crew better than the love you have for Surf, or Tay Roc, will let you admit. Most of you, including me, are part of the Surf gang, and none of us has come close to knowing or seeing him in person. Yet you want to flip it and ask for BS proof (Surf knows it's deep, and did you see him ask for proof?) when a man who literally knows him, has worked with him, and is that specific about the battles he helped with is telling you. It's like someone who has lived with me telling you they saw me take a shit, and you ask, "What's the receipt?" I'm not even a fan of Eazy, but I know he's not a boy and wouldn't be that evil to make such a bold statement. And guess what? Surf literally admitted it, but in a way that waters it down: we're all friends, and seeking counsel is what friends do. Then he went on about how he and Roc are writing for blah blah blah too... and this is the guy who wants 250? You've reinforced his cockiness for a long time, and he's been talking like everyone is below him on Spaces.

They make you hate someone you don't even know by painting a picture for you. Ask yourself: On what basis do I objectively and honestly have issues with this guy? Is it objective? What's the point of
hating him? Is it based on what I know or what was said? Did I think for myself? What crime did he commit that is so bad that it makes the rest of us saints?

Call surf out on his bluff and bs. Be standup dudes and show that you can think for yourselves like a few are doing.

I hope this enlightens someone.

[GodIsAble @nova_nyla]

This teaches us something. don't overdo anything. Know when to stop.... He kept talking heavy against Eazy and now he is forced to respond and he just gave the game up...........Not blaming him at all. And I asked at what point why is he allowing himself to be disrespected by surf without saying anything but little did i know his silence will be mistaken as weakness and now he has relased the bomb.

[GodIsAble @nova_nyla]

this is dumb as hell. I know you are gaslighting and just wanted to diss surf indirectly but make it look like you are doubting what eazy says...If i write a round for you, I am not the one that will deliver it. You do the deliver with your voice and style.....this is the dumbest thing i have seen...How do you know surf pen when you do not ven remember the title of the title of the first page of the book you read, if any, a month ago???? You can see the dap and passion with which he greets eazy and how passionate eazy was also when those land...there is something personal there .

[GodIsAble @nova_nyla]

I have been following both. I have not heard eazy speaking on surf from when he was in prison to lately.

But I have heard surf talking a lot about eazy trying to lil boy him and clown him.

And for someone who knows some secret about you, you have to respect them as they show toward you but if you keep pushing them it is natural that they will respond and thsi is what you get.

What is really special about surf that you a few clowns be glazing the wrong dudes?

Surf has a lot of ego and is cocky and has been moving like that before even he went to prison.

A guy that commits crimes, sell drugs, involve in gangs and which had to do with robbing and shooting etc !!! Is this the kind of guy you guys really glaze?

The USA is fool of some of the best minds of the world but the black entertainment is full of some of the most stupid, low self-esteem, toxic and reatrded peopel I have seen in my life.

Where is the blame for surf who started all this for hours?

And now you are diverting it and playing the victim like oh “why leak messages?” Oh if someone is trying to make it look like I am not talented, when they have befitted from my creative mind it is nice to remind them of who I am!!!!

Surf use to have no 3 rounds! He was known for choking a lot. When he assembled the titles we saw a diff surf and now we know why!!!! And that was a strategic move to benefit him!

Hold him accountable and tell him he did too much shit talking about eazy and as a grown man he had to respond

[GodIsAble @nova_nyla]

@ComradePan72086 @EarthIsAStage7 @Phantomking522 That is it. Eazy has been vey silent on surf but surf keep blowing him and talking mad shit about him and now it feels the gloves are off and I need to remind this guy.

That is him say “enough of the disrespect”

[GodIsAble @nova_nyla]

And surf called eazy a friend whole time to only be dragging him lately including after his latest battle?

It is so sad that when we don’t like someone our taste for the truth disappears and we use sentiments and can’t even be objective.

Eazy has been very careful or distancing himself from speaking on surf and I have watched that as a luxury and mook fan. It is so shameful that you can’t even say the truth.

Now that surf seem to water down this dude and he keeps being loud and get cocky and now eazy wants to remind him of who he is now you are shifting the goal post. It is a disgrace that you can’t even be objective!!!

[GodIsAble @nova_nyla]

@paleochristcon @MrsPaleochrist @patrickbetdavid @RealCandaceO @LionelMedia @scrowder
I work in tech. I use the paid versions of Claude, Grok, and Gemini daily not for fun, but as actual working tools. I challenge them, give them conflicting context, and watch them correct each other in real time. So, when I see people suddenly running to “Advanced AI said I won” after getting crushed in human polls, I know exactly what I’m looking at.

This is one of the most revealing post-debate behaviors you’ll see.
When a debater loses decisively in large human audience polls (the 24-hour PBD poll at ~69% Candace, plus multiple other high-volume X polls in the 60-65%+ range), and then pivots to “but AI says I won,” it usually signals one thing: they know the human verdict was bad and are shopping for a different referee.
Here’s the problem with that move, from someone who works with these systems every day:

1. AI does not “watch” a debate the way humans do Most of the time when people upload a debate or transcript and ask, “who won?”, the model is working with incomplete context, no real feel for live tempo or frame control, and generic academic parameters. Give it a thin prompt like “Who had better evidence?” and it will often default to a low context answer that misses what actually happened in the room.

2. Prompting and context completely change the output. This is the part most people still don’t grasp. The exact same debate fed into the same model can produce opposite conclusions depending on how much context you give it, which moments you highlight, and what criteria you tell it to prioritize. I have seen this repeatedly in professional settings. Change the framing and the “winner” flips. That is not intelligence, that is sensitivity to input. A system that changes its verdict based on how you ask the question is not a neutral judge. It is a mirror of the prompt.

3. Human audiences still saw the holes clearly. Thousands of people watched the full exchange. They saw Wilson unable to name the charges, the failed “I have text evidence” claim, Candace flipping his own “overwhelming evidence” standard back on him, and the visible loss of control. Those are performance facts that no amount of post-hoc AI prompting erases. The large human polls reflected that.

4. What this behavior actually reveals. When someone takes a clear public drubbing and then goes searching for validation from a system that has no lived experience, no independent judgment, and requires constant human correction, it usually means they felt the loss more than they are willing to admit. It is the digital version of “the crowd was wrong, but the machine agrees with me.” That is not strength. That is damage control.

Now to the debate itself.
Andrew, you set the standard: “overwhelming evidence.” Candace immediately flipped it. She forced you to defend that same high bar using the exact same public-record material you were demanding from her. That was the chess move that ended the debate. You never recovered.

You spent three hours essentially asking for evidence of something that is still in court, while your own 75% confidence rested on the same type of inference from the public record. That strategy was never going to work against someone who had lived inside the documents for months.

Then came the charges moment. She listed all seven. You couldn’t name one and asked to look at her phone. That exchange alone told everyone who had done the work.

I used to respect your debate style. That night cost you a fan. Not because of the underlying case, but because of the preparation gap, the loss of frame, and the refusal to own what was obvious.
Running to AI afterward only made it worse. It confirmed the loss was felt.
Human audiences saw the holes in real time. No amount of prompting changes that.

For those of us who actually work with these tools daily, we fight with them constantly correcting them, challenging them, and catching their mistakes in real time. There is no confidently lying genius like AI. It can be confidently incorrect in ways that look completely coherent until you know the subject well enough to see the holes. You only recognize this if you already know your stuff.

The same exact issue can be brought to AI and produce completely different answers depending on the context, parameters, highlights, and the specific bone of contention you give it. For the same debate, it can give you ten different conclusions based purely on how you prompt it.

It is a shame that you are so out of your depth you don’t even understand the limitations of the tool you’re trying to hide behind. That alone tells me you don’t actually know how these systems work.

And the fact that Wilson (and his wife, or whoever is running this defense) is now depending on a flip-flopping, lifeless tool for validation is insane.
A system that has no judgment of its own, changes its answer based on how you prompt it, and requires constant human correction is not a referee. Relying on it after a clear public loss is not logic, it is desperation.

This is no longer just about Wilson.
It is about helping people understand how AI actually works. Do not outsource your judgment to it. Consult it when necessary, evaluate what it tells you, and still rely on your own thinking.
Do not become the kind of person who loses clearly in front of thousands of humans and then runs to a prompt-sensitive tool for comfort. That is not intelligence. That is the opposite.

[GodIsAble @nova_nyla]

Nobody is above suspicion.
I’ve watched over a hundred real investigative cases with body cams and full investigations. When someone dies, the first people law enforcement look at are the partner, the family, the people closest to them. That’s not conspiracy talk — that’s standard procedure. 80 to 90 percent of the time, the person responsible is someone in that inner circle. A wife, a husband, a son, a mother, a father. That’s just how it is.

The human being is selfish and complex. He is capable of anything. We’ve all seen murderers cry, act pitiful, mourn in public, and deny everything until the evidence finally catches them. People save face. That’s human nature. Husbands kill wives. Wives kill husbands. Friends kill friends. Parents kill their kids. Kids kill their parents. This is a fact of life, not a theory.
Just because someone is your wife, your husband, or your brother does not give them automatic immunity from investigation. A lot of people who claim to be wise have a deep flaw of naivety and shallowness on this point. The highest probability for the person who did it is always within close range.

So when Charlie Kirk is killed and people act like Erika Kirk or anyone at TPUSA is somehow off-limits, it looks weird. I’m not saying she did it. I’m saying nobody gets a free pass. The more people work overtime to shut down any questions about her or the people around him, the worse it looks. That energy alone raises flags for a lot of us.

Same with Tyler Robinson. The text messages they released the way he supposedly confessed so casually and in such a short window after a crime like that don’t sit right with me. I’ve seen how people actually behave when they’ve just done something that heavy. Panic mode hits first. Most people don’t sit there typing detailed confessions like that so cleanly. Something about those texts feels off.

Charlie built something massive. A man doesn’t spend his whole youth creating an organization of that size and then suddenly become history without every angle being examined properly. The standard of investigation shouldn’t change just because of who he was or who people want to protect.

And while we’re on it — Andrew Wilson walked into that debate with Candace Owens thinking he could treat it like one of his regular performances. He got exposed. Even as someone who has supported him, I have to say it: Candace showed that day that he’s not as sharp as the hype made him seem when the topic is something she has lived inside for months. She flipped his own standard on him and he never recovered. A lot of people saw it. He’s going to have a harder time going forward because that performance is now the reference point.

Nobody is above suspicion. Not Erika. Not TPUSA leadership. Not Tyler Robinson. Not anyone. The harder people try to make certain names untouchable, the more questions they create.

Betrayal always highly likely comes from within.

If my closest friend of mind died and you say I didn't do it or don't believe I am complicit in their death. The next question critically thinking person should ask you is how did you know or come to that conclusion? And you may never be able to answer that.

What is happening in the deflection camp is that by hook or crook for Tyler to be found guilty whether or not he is guilty so that they are proven right. It is no more a need for the truth and justice. It is now a game of PR and "we should be right". What if he was part of the play but not the actual shooter? Do you have the need to dig deep?

Shutting down people who ask questions is only going to raise more suspicion. These matters are multi-layered. People should not be told who to suspect or not. Believe what you believe but don't force others to believe what you do. The world doesn't revolve around your world view. You have a right to believe Erika is innocent. Somebody else has a right to be suspecting of her. All of you may be correct or wrong at the same time and there is one thing that only knows the truth, those who did it, coordinated it and the shooter and the truth itself.

The more anyone wants you to look away, the more you should be hell bent on looking in. Always think for yourself and try to do so honestly and objectively putting your own biases aside. Never allow anyone to make you think. The government and most organizations have brainwashed our forefathers for a long time just about everything. Think and that is a gift GOD GAVE YOU! USE IT. You will always get to the truth. Don't allow anyone do your thinking for you.

Most of these many followed influencers and podcasters except for few are the ones that are being used to drive a narrative and brainwash you. It is a game of interest and all a play. Follow those that are sincere and you can tell when those you follow play along and don't say the truth. You don't need anyone to tell you. Just watch and unlock your mind you will notice a pattern.

@RealCandaceO @paleochristcon @MrsErikaKirk @joerogan @patrickbetdavid

[GodIsAble @nova_nyla]

@JoeTalkShow Another retarded old head

[GodIsAble @nova_nyla]

And you forget that the pool was just for those who were watching at the time! And the last polls was for 24hrs giving many people access to watch it and now come to vote.

It is crazy how even as a fan of Wilson I could admit how stupid and clueless and how he was outclassed in a debate like that. I have admired him recently and I thought more of him, but after that abysmal performance, I saw a lot of holes and I am questioning a lit of things.

Imagine we have to fight polls and the dinenst thing I have seen today is someone saying CLAUDE ai and some ai said he won without even understanding how much of a difference promoting and context makes to get the right reply and how flawed ai is. It is sad u have to outsource your judgment to ai.

Click my handle and see my breakdown.

On every general search he lost and you will be told clearly Candace won. I left that debate feeling tricked by a guy I thought was the guy and I blamed myself for forgetting he was up against someone that has a more experience than him in this context and that has a bigger resume than him.

He was shutdown and outclassed. He made a fool of himself and failed at a basic level when it mattered the most and it made it teribek to watch. He was completely out of his depth and clueless on an issue he claimed the state has overwhelming evidence not knowing in the first place a single charge against the accused and what made it even more embarrassing was when his opponent named all and he was shocked and asked for phone look.

Lastly a poll is not even necessary. If Candace put up a poll on who won they will say she did. If Wilson puts up a poll they will see he does. If any of you say who have audience that align with you or Israel of hate anyone of the two puts up a poll that poll will favor who you side with!!

It is the dinnest thing. PDB do not even favor that lady in recent months but she still won in his poll.

I hope you are not too stupid to understand that where you have the poll matters in terms of content. If I speak against trump and my audience follow me, they literally align with me. They will vote against trump no matter how well he may have done.

I have issues with cadance but she outclassed him and it was not even close. He picked a fight with someone who has spent months on an issue that she lmwos inside out and that had literally become second nature to her. You go there to ask for evidence and hold her to patsy and question her inference when your position on overwhelming evidence claim is based in the same inference standard???😂😂. The minute that lady flipped that, it was done. From there it was just a walk down. You have a text you claim and you can't show it in the biggest debate of your life that you paid for to look like an idiot? U lied. You called women ratarded and were asked how do you come to that claim also and??? You came against someone that has been in the arena many times. He looked defeat, lost and was like there taking a lecture.

[GodIsAble @nova_nyla]

Yes bullshit. You are in the debate of your life, and you said you have a never before seen text and when pressed to show it on the bigger platforms you said no????? U will break it down on your show 😂😂😂.

My level of anger went up by 20% when you lied and embarrassed yourself at that point!!!

So you couldn't show it where it matters and when it matters???

Con artist.

It took Candace to show us you were never a skilled debater and you will have a hard time debating anyone who watched how Candace dealt with you

[GodIsAble @nova_nyla]

@UBERSOY1 And lastly give us the query or transcript you sent to CLAUDE and that will tell us how Claude responded 😂😂. That is the key

[GodIsAble @nova_nyla]

And ai will delve out of context and if you want me to prove it I will do it now and upload here and tell you that you are smarter than ai. I will give it the context of the debate, highlight the challenging points and watch it flip it's position 😂😂. It will take you a route of logical this and that in that diagram I saw 😂😂 based on the generic ask you ask it without context and pointing to points of contention of the debate.

People are still dumb with ai and not understand it.

[GodIsAble @nova_nyla]

Andrew let me educated you about AI! I have all three including GROKE ai, Gemini and CLAUDE and all paid versions.

You are more brilliant as a human than ai coz you made it. It is b I kind to most things and you have to correct it. Gemini scored Candace winning but at first was blinded sided coz I uploaded the link of the debate and wanted it to analyse it. Decided depending on what someone is looking at.

Now I challenged it as the him an with the facts and ten point and clearly changed it mind and says and admitted it didn't recognize those and says “you lost”. The way ai works is it can give you an opinion without knowing somethings and as someone that works at a high level in TECH, you have the responsibility to tell it things it is not aware of and context of the debate. And you lost in all three.

I work with those all the time and I have to give it context and guide it because it matters. I gave a breakdown of why you lost terribly even as a fan.

You did terrible work!!!

Imagine you lost to humans and u believe ai can make you win. The more you say the less u make of yourself.

It is not even close.

Click my profile and go look what I did that ai couldn't do and why you lost.

It is like me losing an election and going to ai to ask it who won and it says me!! Be!!!! Also

Claude can not analyse pasted links of a youtube video except the transcript. Gemini and grok does that. The last time I checked.

Also ai doesn't understand context and can be more leaning into completely out of context parameters and be generic.

Do you know how many times it tells me crazy things and I have to correct it and give it context 😂😂? And expose it and it apologises!!! That is ai for all of us. I watched the debate and knew you did terribly as a fan but uploaded your debate link to Gemini and u lost and I did for groke and u lost and it became worse when I gave it context.

Also the same guy that told you Claude said u win, another person can ask it and give it context which opens it now to what it doesn't know and will say it lost. It depends on who asks it and what parameters to look at.

You lost to humans and u now run to ai 😂😂.

I have never seen u look stupid on a debate and clueless like I saw you that day. I was gutted and disappointed. U liked defeated. It was a disgrace and you never expected she was that quick, and smart and may be you had so much confidence and overestimated yourself. She controlled the debate, trapped you in the same inference bar u wanted to you with you overwhelming evidence tweet, schooled you about the case citing state and fed docs and gave you every detail…… you disappointed us with patsy 😁😁

It was a sad watch for me

[GodIsAble @nova_nyla]

I don't agree with Candace on many things but it is niy even close. I cannot allow my criticism or disagreement of her rob me off my intellectual honesty and integrity.

Andrew was my guy going into the debate even though I knew he was picking a fight with someone he has never faced with a huge resume in these situations and is a bigger and still a trending voice for a reason whether you kike her or not!!!

If you click my username you will see my breakdown of the debate as I can't type all here.

But Andrew was shutdown and walk down. He was trying to use debate traps and Candace immediately shutdown and expose his loves while engaging him. The chess moment of the debate where I applaud Candace was where she brought up that tweet of Wilson and where also Wilson was making inferences based on public record as he was trying to expose the flaw of Candace and Wilson never recovered from that on. He thought he has going to talk to a normal tiktok chic or only fans girls but had a rude awakening. You are willing to pay $300k for an issue for which you believe the atte has overwhelming evidence as you state and you don't even know one of 7 charges? I mean you can pick any if you forget any!!! That alone exposed him as someone who wanted to just be in stage about something he careless about or know nothing about. I saw how PBD looked at him and I saw how Wilson was shaken and surprised by the fact that Candace could name all 7 and to compound the humiliation, he asked for the phone to be looked at and couldn't believe.

Now he wanted to get into his debate trap mode, rapid questions as he handles others and forget the profile of who he has dealing with. Candace shut him down and I knew also at that point this is a hail Mary!!!!!! One thing about debates is when your opponent is fully aware of your tricks and refuse to play to it and expose it. It discourages you naturally.

Above all, Candace knows the case and was like Andrew sat there getting a real breakdown of things from a teacher. He was defeated and all his energy was sucked. Plus, his freedom to smoke was taken away!!!

Finally, in the biggest debate of his life, he was asked for the text he claimed to have and the dumbass lied to all of us by saying no he will break it down on his channel! What??????? When you are on the two biggest platforms????

Above all he was held to the retard statement and trapped in his logic and failed terrible. It was sad to see. He said all women are RETARDS!!!!!!!! He called it a tongue cheek moment!!

It took Candace to show how much average Andrew is and how to deal with him. She had control, understand the details, was quick to see the traps, shutdown the traps, fold Andrew into his own inference traps and lack of evidence. Andrew looked like a man in a strange land.

The debate guru dialed woefully and it was a smackdown.

I love him but it took Candace to make me question certain things. It was a terrible look! Not even close.

[GodIsAble @nova_nyla]

@paleochristcon
7/10 is pure cope and you know it.
I’m a fan and this is the most disappointing, clueless performance I’ve ever seen from you.
You took serious money, paid a high cost, then sat there for 3 hours looking defeated and walked on a case you clearly only had general ideas about. Candace has spent hundreds of hours in the documents. You hadn’t.
The second she flipped your own “overwhelming evidence / inference” standard back on you, you crumbled and never got back in the game. Classic chess move. You walked into a trap you set yourself.
You tried to turn it into a debate-mechanics lecture and teacher-student interrogation. She noticed immediately, exposed the tactic, and refused to play. Smart.
You also lied about having compelling text evidence in the biggest debate of your life, then couldn’t produce it when it mattered and said you’d show it later on your smaller channel — while sitting on the two biggest platforms. That’s embarrassing.
You picked a fight with someone who actually knows the material cold and is quick. You got exposed. Own the L.

I love your work. But I will not rob myself the wrong way just to pamper and cover an abysmal performance. You got exposed. Own the

You come across as a fraud. THATE DEBATE MADE YOU LOOK MISERBALE. I wonder if you ever watch candace or know her resume before you pick this nonsense fight that you called for. I told a friend before the debate that I have confidence in Wilson, but I am not optimistic because Owens is not any other person Wilson has dealt with and she will shut down those debate traps Wilson has. That is what happened. She is very quick and is not short of ideas and talking points which makes me predict she will control the debate. I told my friend you are paying this money for visibility through a big name with a monumental profile than you on all level. She did not allow you one bit, to pull any of your debate moves and while she was debating you, she was also telling the audience your moves. And above all you call women retards.

[GodIsAble @nova_nyla]

I did a post breaking down the debate and I can't post it here because it is long. I am disappointed in his performance. It was a terrible walk down of him. I say this as a man. And I am impressed that literally every comment here In PBD account was disappointed and picked Owens as the winner. He was clueless and you went against someone who has spent 100's of hours on this issue that has made her an expert. And it was wild when he was asked for the evidence of text, he says he has and he said no not anymore but will break it down on his show? in the debate of your life that you pay someone for? and pdb was shocked and I was. I will never treat him with seriousness again. what a clown show. he paid for advert and visibility.