@erikmagraken Maybe they should call this the "theftimonials" page... as far as I'm aware, individuals have a right to control the use of their name and portrait. Wait, the Privacy Act is kind of blunt about it! Too bad none of us knows anyone who knows how to file Supreme Court actions!
Oh man... this a hilarious testimonial @erikmagraken. At least I feel pretty sure it wasn't fabricated by AI! Found it on https://t.co/kfCP6xFKU7 (and I'm assuming it's with your knowledge... but who knows!)
@erikmagraken Does not surprise me. It appears to have been lifted from "mashed up" tweets, edited together (with parts omitted), and the source (Twitter) is not acknowledged. Feels like the makings of a law school hypothetical. I bet Caseway could have spotted the legal issues here!
If you are part of the legal community in British Columbia, please share this news with your networks. E-search and document downloads via CSO are now free at our library branches. https://t.co/pOPA6kdRXb
It's been a minute since I posted to @slaw_dot_ca - but here is a post about how BC's CSO E-search can be put to use... especially when it's offered to you for free (because that's what @theCLBC does!)
Looking for a better way to resolve a conflict? Make an appointment or drop into our free Ask a Mediator clinic. They run the first and third Tuesday of every month from 4-6pm. Next one is July 16th. https://t.co/3mA0cpVN32
@inspiredcat Loving the posts and analysis Cat. We met once in NOLA at a Clio conference. Glad to see you still so tuned in and curious. I’ll keep my eyes on this thread. 👍
@emmaydee@aCameronhuff I would characterize it this way: there is broad ignorance among lawyers generally, and the family bar being no exception, regarding how cryptocurrencies are acquired, stored, and exchanged for fiat value. It is a black box to most, and few cases arise. https://t.co/ncWwcmeQNE
@HannahDeJong@CBCNews https://t.co/6YrZIn8M5X via @BCLegislature
Clearly, the ban on courts making "shared" pet possession/ownership orders is intentional, and this intent is a clear matter of record in Hansard
@HannahDeJong@CBCNews Not sure how to push this issue to readers of @cbcnewsbc and @CBCLarsen with enough priority... but this reporting (and decision) is bound to sew confusion.
-see FLA s. 97(4.2) https://t.co/GHFsUoCg9f
Note of caution⚠️
This is a confusing case. The new law (s. 97 (4.2) of the Family Law Act) says courts can’t order shared possession or ownership of a pet. Associate judge doesn't explain this contradiction in reasons for judgment. Be wary of recommending this story or this case
A golden retriever named Stella is now part of legal history in B.C. after an upper court decision based on new laws that recognize pets as family members, not just property. https://t.co/7lAL9f08Dd .
@CBCNews Note of caution ⚠️
This is a confusing case. The new law (section 97 (4.2) of the Family Law Act) says courts can’t order shared possession or ownership.
Associate judge does not explain this contradiction in reasons for judgment. Be wary of recommending this story or this case.
I am thrilled to see this much needed expansion in access to legal services for those leaving violent relationships. After two decades of severe underfunding of family legal aid, this change is desperately needed to protect the rights of women and children https://t.co/bThuLFrphX