The content are as follows:
📌 RE: REQUEST TO UPLIFT PROHIBITION IN TERMS OF SECTION 29(2) OF THE IMMIGRATION ACT
Your request to uplift the prohibition placed on your name has been considered and was unsuccessful due to the following reasons:
1. According to the Departmental System, your visitor's visa expired on 2013‑01‑27 and you failed to leave the Republic. Further, there is no record that you were ever issued with any type of visa.
2. There is no explanation given for your illegality from the date of expiry of your visitor's visa.
3. On 2018‑11‑28 you lodged an application for the change of conditions of your visa, in respect of which you submitted a fraudulent relative's visa.
4. On 2019‑11‑29 you submitted another application with VFS and attached a fraudulent study visa purportedly issued in Lagos — whereas all this time you were in the Republic. There is no explanation given for the study visa; in your representation you denied knowledge of the relative's visa.
5. There is no information or evidence tendered to support your claim from the person who acted on your behalf to prove he was not complicit in the acquisition of the fraudulent visas.
6. As a minor you relied on your parent, but the same parent failed to provide the Department with the sequence of events which led to the acquisition of the fraudulent visas.
7. In this case, there is a gross violation of the immigration laws of which someone has to be held accountable. (partially obscured by hand)
Yours faithfully,
MR. M. M... (signature, official's surname partially obscured)
@mailandguardian you didn’t do you due diligence but that’s because you are always pushing an agenda! You got caught and exposed! Hence you folded and deleted the article.