afdsgtxd

[Ar-risaalah Publications @ArrisaalahPubs]

📘 NEW PDF

📄 A Reminder on What Caused the Fitnah of Amjad Rafīq (Abū Iyaad of Salafi Publications)

🖊 Written by: Abū Anwar An-Naijiriyy

Amjad Rafiq and his followers continue to try all means to confuse and distort the origin and genesis of affairs in order to claim acquittal in what he started and caused. The fitnah of Abu Iyaad did not start when the one whose truthfulness or precision has not been attested to narrated from another person that Shaykh Arafaat said: "we consider him to be an innovator", nor did it begin with other red herrings that his followers throw at real issues and actions of their leader.

📎 https://t.co/QhQOMwjzZV

[afdsgtxd @nuclearwarf]

@anwarphilly Also to you shaykh.

[Anwar Wright @anwarphilly]

Jazakallahu khyran.

[afdsgtxd @nuclearwarf]

@AhmadHassan9909 @mt3sb_79 Is that a scam?

[afdsgtxd @nuclearwarf]

@mt3sb_79 @BakkahPubs Then why Amjadh should compare Shaykh bukhari to Pope like figure?

When he can simply argue and refute the arguments instead of such comparisons?

Why he should compare Sh. to pope in vattican? What he has to do with salafis?

[afdsgtxd @nuclearwarf]

@mt3sb_79 Even Ali al Hudhayfi when did spubs organize anything with him?

[afdsgtxd @nuclearwarf]

@mt3sb_79 Whom you Quote agaisnt Ustadh Lahmami

[afdsgtxd @nuclearwarf]

@mt3sb_79 Where was Bilal then?

[afdsgtxd @nuclearwarf]

@mt3sb_79 Allahul Musta'an, nothing to do with the tweet?

Isn't your tweet include about returning to the scholars? And the topic of Sh Bukhari?

I don't understand why you should gaslight us or even trying make us live in a dilution of accepting anything you say as factual.

[afdsgtxd @nuclearwarf]

@mt3sb_79 even Bilal Salimi, Ali al Hudhayfi, we have never in life, heard there names until this Sudan and Yemen fithna come, this is so strange to the principles which are preached for past 30+ years.

[afdsgtxd @nuclearwarf]

@mt3sb_79 because shaykh bukhari was known for resolving disputes between salafis, specially having his experience on western dawah and dealing with it, how can someone who is experienced replaced by someone who was completely alien to it? for example Sh Nizar

[afdsgtxd @nuclearwarf]

@mt3sb_79 Note: all I did was asked questions for the doubt that you presented in your tweet, I didn't speak ill of any scholar or student of knowledge. I was only asking questions for the doubts. and asking the details for doubts that you're presenting.

[afdsgtxd @nuclearwarf]

@mt3sb_79 @BakkahPubs So it can clearly be seen that Shaykh is comparing a statement of Amr Ibn Ubayd, he doesn't liken him to mu'tazilee, he was comparing the same sentiment, where both are saying scholars are not capable to comprehend, this is what meant, Allah knows best.

[afdsgtxd @nuclearwarf]

@mt3sb_79 then how can be accusing someone of resembling the speech of the mutazilee become tabdee?

[afdsgtxd @nuclearwarf]

@mt3sb_79 What I'm asking is why you're so biased towards one claim while completely ignoring the opposite side argument?

this doesn't sound just, isn't it?

[afdsgtxd @nuclearwarf]

@mt3sb_79 ...sense how can someone is so obviously compared to the position of the pope is not takfir?

when similarly fawaz al madhkali called salafis "sufiyyah of bukhari" isnt this obvious tabdee?