no one

[໊ @buffys]

post a random picture or else everything will go bad in september.

[Sawai @HHMaharajaSawai]

Handus will look at Khajuraho and justify bestiality.

[Angry Saffron @AngrySaffron]

😂🤣

[no one @nuknarrative]

@TharSurferMK Saw you’re a Puskharna brahmin, so I followed you,that was literally my entire reason

[no one @nuknarrative]

@TharSurferMK 2019 - 2022

[Balaganpathi 🌞 @Balaganpathi]

For the benefit of those who want to remain away from clutches of kali:

"Hare Padmanabah ! Namoh ! Padmanabah !"

[Shivam Mishra #savekashi @Bharatvidya1]

आर्य समाज इतने परमपरावादी है कि गीता के सात सौ में केवल सत्तर श्लोक को असली मानते है, राम और कृष्ण को भगवान तक नहीं मानते। भगवा पहनने से कोई परंपरावादी नहीं हो जाता।

[Toka @TokaTakes]

What a Chad. The cuck BJP Fadnavis Sarkar had no option to go after him. But unfortunately he is Santosh Pandit, and not Rhiya Ahir, so will @RahulGandhi even show interest?

[Vikram Singh @Vi_kram92]

The way this massive Nandi gently plays along just to make the little one feel tough is everything 🥺❤️ A true gentle giant.

[no one @nuknarrative]

💔

[vipin talwar @vipintalwar]

No one compares to a mother’s unconditional love.

[Ayush Sharma @ayusharma_bh]

मन पर किसने विजय पा ली, कैसे बोध होगा? भरतजी को कटु शब्द कहते देखा जाता है, रामजी को रुदन करते देखा जाता है, वसिष्ठजी को आत्महत्या करने जाते देखा जाता है, दुर्वासाजी को क्रोधित होते देखा जाता है।

[ghatak @Neetivaan]

another masterstroke loading

[no one @nuknarrative]

यदा नृपः स्वधर्मं च त्यक्त्वा स्वपरम्परां तथा।
गुरूणां चरणं हित्वा शत्रूणां चरणं व्रजेत्॥
तदा राष्ट्रस्य मानं च गौरवं च विनश्यति।
स्वाभिमानविहीनस्य राष्ट्रस्य पतनं ध्रुवम्॥

[no one @nuknarrative]

These are the same people who will seek scriptural dharmic gyan from Acharya Prashant while abusing pure, traditional Dharmacharyas and then go on to speak nonsense without understanding the subject in the first place.

[Nandini Gupta @yoursnandieni]

Suryaputra Karna was, is, and will always be better than Arjuna. It was only Krishna’s trickery that led to Karna’s death, otherwise, things would have been very different.

[Sawai @HHMaharajaSawai]

Mahabharat, Star Plus Parva, 8:00PM - 9:00 PM Sukta

[no one @nuknarrative]

@HHMaharajaSawai * 8:00 -9:00 PM "SUKTA" *

[no one @nuknarrative]

These sbhuman pgskin mlecchas love to sexualize women. We hindus don't need to copy that. Don't behave like these subhuman mlecchas by sexualizing hindu women just for their validation. Have some self-respect.Don't turn our country into something like east aisan.

[no one @nuknarrative]

@Victorforce2 Next time put Papistan right in the title Papistan Got Hammered: Part 2. No need to leave the culprit unnamed

[Victorforce @Victorforce2]

Operation Sindoor video compilation, Part 1

[Sahana Singh @singhsahana]

Are people aware of what is happening in the new Nalanda university? I have received a very unsettling mail from a student studying there.

He says "I am approaching you in a desperate attempt to find a way to somehow dismantle the misinformation and false narratives being propagated. While the central government claims this new structure to be the 'revival' of ancient Nalanda University, nothing could be further from the truth."

It's a long email, so I am just listing the important points.

1. He alleges that one professor K.T. Sarao delivered a talk to the whole university on how Brahmins/Hindus might have burnt the ancient Nalanda, after a conflict between Buddhist monks and Brahmins. The prof also conjectured that another possibility could be that Khilji mistook the ancient university for a fort and similarly dressed monks as soldiers; hence he might have mistakenly attacked the university.

2. He alleges that another professor, one Shailendra Raj Mehta, who visited the University couple of days back said in his lecture that the ancient Nalanda was purely Buddhist, as there was no system of building education institutes in Hindu tradition.

3. Prof Mehta also allegedly claimed that the traditions of Vaada and Samvaada were unique to ancient Nalanda, as earlier Hindus had no such tradition.

4. He alleges that one Prof Pranshu Samdarshi in a lecture stated that Upanishads were written after the emergence of Buddhism, and he quoted some western scholar.

5. Prof Pranshu Samdarshi also allegedly claimed that since Hindus could not defend their philosophical position against Buddhist Shunyata, they came up with Advaita Vedanta.

Lastly, the student has informed me that all the classes on Buddhist studies are being taught by monks and nuns. However, Hindu studies are being taught by profs who have no expertise in Hinduism or Vedanta.

I am deeply disappointed. If the new Nalanda is truly meant to revive the spirit of the ancient Nalanda, then it must revive its intellectual honesty as well. A university worthy of that name should be a place of Vaada where competing interpretations are examined against texts, inscriptions, archaeology and historical evidence, not presented to students as settled fact merely because they diminish the Hindu intellectual tradition.

Buddhism deserves to be taught by those who know it deeply and sympathetically; Hindu traditions deserve exactly the same scholarly seriousness.

A government-funded institution cannot call itself a civilizational revival while allowing one tradition to speak in its own voice and requiring another to be explained largely through the assumptions of its critics. If these allegations are accurate, the question that must be asked is - what exactly is being revived at Nalanda?

@narendramodi @EduMinOfIndia @DrSJaishankar @PralhadJoshiOfc

[🍁 @immgkj_]

M*di's BJP promoting Buddhism from an Ambedkarite lens was a calculated move to shift Indian socio-political battle from Hindu vs Moslem paradigm to Low caste vs Brahmin paradigm.