@torstenonai@haider1 Funnily price-wise, if you keep context below 272K tokens, then Sol is cheaper than Sonnet. OpenAI discontinued Terra and has slashed Sol prices twice already.
@AC_Creative08@count_of23995@bridgemindai Stop baiting me with stupid posts. It was obvious that he just wanted to spend all the usage on stupid background tasks with many agents running concurrently. Auditing your whole codebase is a background task. Ultrafast is for more interactive use where the 6x price is worth it
@savvyntsev@robsonsmelo@albertgao@theo The 1.7 number actaully originates from their own support side numbers.
https://t.co/6e2I6MuzDS
480/280 roughly 1.7
@gjhyj_@SimonasLTU1 In benchmarks the tasks are deliberately hard and harnesses take many turns to complete the task. Lesser models take more turns to complete the task, increasing their cost. In daily agentic use, if the task is simple and both answer in one shot = cheaper token gives more usage.
@gjhyj_@SimonasLTU1 I honestly I have the same expectation. It would seem logical that all the Anthropic 5.5 models would beat GPT6 models in "intelligence." As to cost per task I am not sure. OpenAI did the 50% discount and Anthropic models usually use more than 2x tokens (thinking + "tokenizer")
@miracache I gave Opus 5.5 a product idea and a task to choose optimal tech stack for it. It considered python, TS and Kotlin backend. It chose Kotlin and implemented with. I wish I had not YOLO-d that part 😅
@gjhyj_@SimonasLTU1 Well to me it seemed to be an Anthropic vs OpenAi bait post and he used his Luna vs Opus example to "support" his "point" which is low...
It is fine that Luna loses to Mimo with similar API pricing, but via subscriptions you get up to 50 times lower pricing than API
@nikitathakur21 DB has index usage stats recording and actually usually the more expensives writes are not the main concern. It is the increased memory usage.