Minister ji, nice words about “समग्र शिक्षा”, “capacity building” and “school infrastructure”.
But did you also discuss the most important subject?
How are papers getting leaked?
How is the exam system getting compromised?
Why are students studying for years but the system keeps failing them?
Why does NTA keep becoming a symbol of mismanagement instead of trust?
Under your watch, UGC-NET 2024 had to be cancelled after the exam integrity was questioned. Under your watch, NEET-UG 2024 became a national shame, and the Supreme Court itself recorded that the paper leak at Hazaribagh and Patna was not in dispute.
So before giving speeches on education reform, please answer one basic question:
If the Education Ministry cannot protect exam papers, what exactly is it protecting?
Students do not need photo-ops, garlands and meeting-room statements.
Students need leak-proof exams, transparent accountability and a minister who takes responsibility.
Bihar gave the world Nalanda.
Do not reduce education to slogans while paper leaks, exam scams and administrative failure destroy the future of honest students.
And the biggest question remains:
After repeated exam failures under your ministry, why are you still holding the post?
In any serious system, accountability starts from the top.
In Indian politics, failure gets another garland.
One more hidden cost in this “cheap ethanol” debate: water.
Some people say, “We already grow sugarcane, rice and maize, so why count water?”
That logic is weak.
Water cost does not become zero just because the crop already exists. If government policy creates more demand for crop-based ethanol, then crop patterns, procurement, incentives and groundwater pressure also change.
The real issue is not only factory water. The bigger issue is crop-water footprint.
Approx water footprint for producing 1 litre of ethanol:
Sugarcane ethanol: around 2,800 to 3,600 litres of water
Maize ethanol: around 4,600 litres of water
Rice-based ethanol: above 10,000 litres of water
So the question is simple:
Are we reducing petrol imports by silently increasing pressure on India’s groundwater?
Today we import crude oil.
Tomorrow, if groundwater levels collapse, what will we import?
Water?
And even if water cannot be imported practically, the cost will still come back to citizens through water scarcity, tanker dependency, crop stress, food inflation and farmer distress.
This is why ethanol must not be sold only as “₹20 cheaper per litre.”
Tell the full truth:
What is the blend percentage?
What feedstock was used?
Sugarcane, maize, rice, molasses or 2G agricultural waste?
What is the mileage loss?
What is the real cost per kilometre?
What is the water footprint?
What is the long-term impact on older vehicles?
Waste-biomass ethanol may be a better direction.
But food-crop ethanol needs serious public scrutiny.
Cheap per litre is marketing.
Cheap per kilometre, with water and mileage included, is reality.
Stop fooling people with “cheap fuel” marketing.
Fuel is not cheap because the litre price is lower. Fuel is cheap only when cost per kilometre is lower.
If petrol/E20 at ₹102.12 gives 40 km/l, the running cost is ₹2.55 per km.
Now E85 is being shown as “₹20 cheaper” at around ₹82.12 per litre. Sounds great, right?
But E85 has much lower energy because ethanol carries less energy than petrol. So if mileage drops from 40 km/l to around 29 to 32 km/l, the so-called cheap fuel becomes equal or even costlier per km.
This is the real scam:
Government shows price per litre.
Public pays cost per kilometre.
And this is not just about mileage. Ethanol absorbs water. Water plus oxygen plus metal means corrosion risk. If ethanol-water separation happens inside storage or fuel systems, the bottom layer can become more corrosive and damaging to tanks, pumps, injectors, lines, seals and older fuel-system parts.
Basic chemistry:
Ethanol oxidation can form acetic acid:
C2H5OH + O2 → CH3COOH + H2O
Acid can attack iron:
Fe + 2CH3COOH → Fe(CH3COO)2 + H2
Rust needs iron, oxygen and water:
4Fe + 3O2 + 6H2O → 4Fe(OH)3
So stop calling it cheap unless you publish the full truth:
1. Blend percentage at every pump
2. Vehicle compatibility clearly displayed
3. Expected mileage loss
4. Cost per km, not just price per litre
5. Long-term impact on older vehicles
6. Warranty clarity in writing
If ethanol is truly better, prove it with transparent cost-per-km data. Don’t make citizens pay the same price for lower energy fuel and then tell them it is a national service.
Cheap per litre is marketing. Cheap per kilometre is reality.
Stop fooling people with “cheap fuel” marketing.
Fuel is not cheap because the litre price is lower. Fuel is cheap only when cost per kilometre is lower.
If petrol/E20 at ₹102.12 gives 40 km/l, the running cost is ₹2.55 per km.
Now E85 is being shown as “₹20 cheaper” at around ₹82.12 per litre. Sounds great, right?
But E85 has much lower energy because ethanol carries less energy than petrol. So if mileage drops from 40 km/l to around 29 to 32 km/l, the so-called cheap fuel becomes equal or even costlier per km.
This is the real scam:
Government shows price per litre.
Public pays cost per kilometre.
And this is not just about mileage. Ethanol absorbs water. Water plus oxygen plus metal means corrosion risk. If ethanol-water separation happens inside storage or fuel systems, the bottom layer can become more corrosive and damaging to tanks, pumps, injectors, lines, seals and older fuel-system parts.
Basic chemistry:
Ethanol oxidation can form acetic acid:
C2H5OH + O2 → CH3COOH + H2O
Acid can attack iron:
Fe + 2CH3COOH → Fe(CH3COO)2 + H2
Rust needs iron, oxygen and water:
4Fe + 3O2 + 6H2O → 4Fe(OH)3
So stop calling it cheap unless you publish the full truth:
1. Blend percentage at every pump
2. Vehicle compatibility clearly displayed
3. Expected mileage loss
4. Cost per km, not just price per litre
5. Long-term impact on older vehicles
6. Warranty clarity in writing
If ethanol is truly better, prove it with transparent cost-per-km data. Don’t make citizens pay the same price for lower energy fuel and then tell them it is a national service.
Cheap per litre is marketing. Cheap per kilometre is reality.
Meeting photos and “productive discussions” look good only when the education system is actually protecting students.
What about the recent paper leak? What about the students who were standing outside exam centres, crying, confused and helpless, while the so-called system failed them? How did sensitive exam processes collapse so badly? How were contracts and responsibilities handed to vendors who could not protect the future of lakhs of students?
This is not a small administrative error. This is a direct attack on students’ trust, parents’ money and years of hard work.
No accountability, no resignation, no serious action, yet the same people continue chairing meetings and giving lectures on “quality education”. And the Central Government keeps backing this failure.
Before talking about enrolment, skill development and education reforms, first answer one basic question:
Who is accountable when students’ futures are destroyed by paper leaks and failed exam systems?
Held a productive discussion with Ms. @sakinaitoo, Hon’ble Minister for Education, Health & Medical Education and Social Welfare, Government of Jammu & Kashmir.
Reviewed issues related to Teacher Education Institutions and the progress of school and higher education initiatives in Jammu & Kashmir. Discussed teacher training, institutional development, skilling and other measures to further strengthen the education ecosystem.
Encouraging to note the positive trends in enrolment and educational outcomes. Through continued collaboration between the Central Government and the Government of Jammu & Kashmir, we remain committed to expanding access to quality education, enhancing employability and creating greater opportunities for the students and youth of Jammu & Kashmir.
@ANI This is a genuinely good initiative. Rewarding Rahveers and covering emergency treatment can save real lives.
One humble request: also gift every Rahveer 5L ethanol-blended petrol + 5L isobutanol-blended diesel, so their confidence rises like vehicle owners’ anxiety.
@dpradhanbjp@DrPramodPSawant Did you also share tips on how exams can be compromised, paper-leak allegations get buried under inquiries, and university tenders go to incompetent favourites?
Youth do not need photo-ops and slogans. They need clean exams, fair tenders, and accountable leadership. Shameful.
Siraj after hitting one six:
That’s it, boys. My bowling career was just a side quest. I am officially a batter now. I’ve already spoken to Ashish Nehra, and next IPL season I’ll open the innings. One six is enough evidence. Talent has announced itself.
Confidence: one six.
Dream: Orange Cap.
Reality: No. 11 with Wi-Fi connection to confidence.
@Ra_Bies@Atulsingh_asan मैं मोदी जी से आपकी कॉन्फ्रेंस कॉल की व्यवस्था करवा देता हूँ। उनके पास इसका कोई न कोई अच्छा समाधान ज़रूर होगा। नहीं तो कम से कम “मन की बात” में ही इस विषय पर चर्चा हो जाएगी।
Claude Code is a strong tool, but I don’t see it competing with Codex at the same level. Codex feels more focused on real software engineering workflows: understanding repos, making precise code changes, following context, and helping developers ship faster. That is where the real edge is.
Give me something free too. Why do you keep taking tax from me?
My productivity also goes down when I think about how much tax I have to pay. And honestly, it feels like my hard-earned money is going straight into the mouths of ****.
Politicians use taxpayers’ money for freebie schemes just to lure voters from one election to the next, as if it is their parents’ money to throw around.
@mufaddal_vohra Vaibhav Sooryavanshi in the T20 team. Young, fearless, and already making the country talk.
This is not just a selection, this is the start of a new cricket story. 🇮🇳
Gautam Gambhir does not come across as a good human being when he speaks about players. He is always in a criticized mode.
As a coach, you cannot keep speaking this way about any player, even when that player is at his worst. Rishabh Pant has given enough to Indian cricket and deserves guidance, not public pressure through press conferences.
Criticism is fine. Constant negativity is not leadership.
Khan Sir is not the messiah of education. He is the perfect example of how the coaching mafia manufactures a saint image.
First create a mass fanbase, then turn every question into an emotional drama, then appear on big shows, collect sympathy, and let the crowd attack anyone who dares to question the business model.
Education needs accountability, not celebrity worship.
Exactly. Corporate employees are busy calculating EMI eligibility, while the real wealth creators are busy “serving the nation.”
One side gets salary, tax, appraisal and anxiety. The other gets power, files, permissions, contracts, land deals and generational comfort.
And then we are told the middle class should work harder. Bro, harder than whom? The system is designed so honest income buys survival, while managed corruption buys legacy.
Faisal Khan (Khan Sir) looks less like a teacher in trouble and more like a man studying the Kejriwal playbook.
Anna movement gave Kejriwal a crowd, a moral image and a political launchpad. Here, the student base is becoming that same crowd. First sympathy, then street power, then “voice of students”, then political relevance.
The goal may not be Bihar CM in this tenure. That is too early. But the positioning has started. In Indian politics, movements rarely remain movements. Someone always converts them into a chair.
South India is not won by collecting film stars like IPL auction picks. Stars can bring crowds, but crowds don’t automatically become votes.
Kerala, Karnataka, Andhra and Tamil Nadu each have their own language pride, caste equations, welfare politics, regional parties and local issues. Only Rajinikanth had that rare pan-Tamil emotional pull to attempt something like this before Vijay, if he had really wanted to enter politics with full force.
But even that would not be enough without cadre, trust, alliances and a believable state-level agenda. Cinema optics cannot replace political depth.
Why is Nitin Gadkari acting like India’s unofficial Petroleum Minister?
He is the Road Transport Minister. His job is roads, highways, flyovers, expressways, road safety, toll accountability and contractor quality.
But every few days, he is selling ethanol dreams: E20, E85, E100, sugarcane, maize, flex-fuel.
Where is the Petroleum Minister then?
And more importantly, are Indian vehicle owners test samples?
Old bikes and cars are already facing mileage drop, rubber damage, fuel pipe issues, rusting, starting trouble and repair bills because of ethanol blending concerns. Who will pay for this?
The minister? Oil companies? Car companies?
No. The same middle-class public that already pays tax, GST, toll, FASTag, insurance, registration and inflated fuel prices.
This is not science. This is forced experimentation.
Science means transparent testing, public data, consumer choice, warranty protection and accountability.
If E85 and E100 are so great, sell them only for vehicles designed for them. Do not push every citizen into a fuel experiment.
And while all this fuel lecture is going on, look at the roads.
Flyovers are patched. Expressways are uneven. Toll roads shake the car like a tractor track.
First fix the road under the tyre.
Then lecture us about the fuel inside the tank.
प्रधान जी, जितने पेड़ लगाने हैं लगा लीजिए, लेकिन बच्चों के भविष्य पर जो कुल्हाड़ी चली है, उसकी भरपाई फोटो खिंचवाकर नहीं होगी।
CBSE हो या NEET, लाखों बच्चों और उनके परिवारों ने आपकी मंत्रालयी नाकामी, लापरवाही और संवेदनहीनता देख ली है। जिन बच्चों का पहला पेपर अच्छा गया था, जो दोबारा पेपर नहीं देना चाहते थे, जो इस पूरी अनिश्चितता और अन्याय से डिप्रेशन में चले गए, उनकी पीड़ा का हिसाब कौन देगा?
और उन बच्चों का क्या, जिन्होंने इस सिस्टम के दबाव, डर और टूटे भरोसे में अपनी जान तक गंवा दी? उनके माता-पिता के आंसू किस पेड़ से पोंछेंगे आप?
पर्यावरण के नाम पर कैमरा चमक सकता है, लेकिन बच्चों की मेहनत, आंसू, टूटे सपने और बर्बाद मानसिक स्थिति का पाप इतनी आसानी से नहीं धुलेगा।
आप शिक्षा मंत्री कम, सत्ता की ढपली बजाने वाले मौन दर्शक ज्यादा लगते हैं। देश को फोटोशूट नहीं, जवाबदेही चाहिए। बच्चों के भविष्य से खिलवाड़ हुआ है, और इसका प्रायश्चित भाषणों से नहीं, इस्तीफे और जवाबदेही से होगा।