@melvindvivas How about no.. you want bots? Go make them your self. All you gotta do is ask Claude to do it and hook them up over mcp/skills. We do NOT need a usage cut for something not everyone will even use...
@hqmank The model is fine... Surely beats the hell out of most others in the market except Claude. The whole here's our grok bot knockoff we slashed your usage thing though... That's a bit of a different story.
@rynorhn I prefer to have Claude for the smarts and codex for the usage, but of course, that's getting cut, effectively eliminating any advantage of it...
@bughuntergeek@CtrlAltDwayne Honestly what they have is perfectly fine, both models miss something the other catches, so it's a best of both worlds situation to have and utilize both. But no where do bots really fit in there. I suppose it's nice for automation tasks like email, tasks, but for the compute??
@embw_l0x I mean, if I wanted an orchestrator I could of literally just designated a codex thread as one. It's only saving grace is it's free to use as of right now. But after that, nothing really special
@lucas_sangoi@dummerspast39 Guarantee the corpo execs sat in a meeting fucking around with these bots and being like "IT CAN CONPILE A SPREADSHEET OF HOW WE CAN NEXT FUCK OVER OUR USERBASE AND CUT COSTS!!!" over voice then cheered on like it was some next revolutionary thing everyone will just love..