Meanwhile, accountants are fighting for their lives.
Some are sending auditors schedules that doesn't tie to the trial balance.
Auditors, on the other hand, don't even know what they are doing.
Internal auditors just appear to have a natural rivalry with external auditors and they hate accountants.😭
In my over 12 years of accounting advisory career, the lawyers are the ones that make my life difficult.
Tax folks are the absolute gem. They just want to know what you landed on for accounting and they will take it from there. Lawyers will show you “shege” prior to that point.
If you're man between the ages of 30 to 34, and you know that you're not in any relationship and you are looking to marry within a year.
I have a 28 year old single lady from Imo state, a banker and genotype, AA to introduce to you.
I just want you to know somethings:
1. She makes her own money and she earns well
2. She still lives with her parents in Lagos, despite being able to afford her own place.
3. She's not a religious fanatic but she reveres God.
4. She's the only daughter of her parents and was raised in a strict and disciplined home.
5. She's not interested in playing games. And she's not saying that you must marry her.
6. She doesn't want your money, but you have to show that you're ready to marry and be responsible as a man should be.
7. She's not a feminists and admires marriage and she wants to be married before having children.
8. She's not interested in any LDR. You must be residing in Lagos.
If you would like to be introduced to her, please send me a DM.
End.
Hold it there😊
Don’t confuse people moving on with them not caring, or assume that because colleagues are leaving, the friendships they built at work were never genuine.
You can be professional, get your work done, collect your pay, and still build meaningful friendships with people you work with.
Workplaces are not devoid of genuine relationships. We have people that met their life partners at work.
Let’s not turn one experience into a universal rule.
@O_ladele Again the point of “no one at your office is your friend” has been proven right.
Get your work done , get paid and go home my bro. If they didn’t care about leaving you there then the truth is you didn’t matter.
You are asking what changed because you see married couples showing affection in Makkah. Nothing changed.
1) They are not a couple. This is just social media noise. I have credible intel from my source in Saudi Arabia. The authorities see married people showing affection all the time without issues. These two are married to different people, which makes them adulterers.
2) They were not executed because they kissed. They engaged in severe sexual acts. What they did is way more than kissing. People are hanging onto the kissing rumor to make the offense look less grievous.
3) They were not able to prove ignorance. In Islamic jurisprudence, genuine ignorance of a law or boundary gives room for mercy and a softer landing. The fact that they could not establish ignorance shows their intent was deliberate.
4) They were tried under a court of competent jurisdiction and they freely confessed. They were not coerced. About 12 judges were present during the proceedings. The evidence against them was too weighty for them to receive a lighter punishment.
Every country has its own rules and laws. This is why I tell people to always obey the rules and laws of your host country.
Do not protest. Do not flout public orders. Do not test the boundaries of a foreign legal system. You cannot import your own moral compass and force it on theirs. When you cross a border, your feelings no longer dictate the law.
Let’s stick to the facts.
But AYO, don’t you think the punishment is extreme? Truly, your concerns are valid.
But I want you to know that the word “extreme” is a relative term. It is not absolute. And you cannot define what is extreme until you establish the baseline you are measuring from.
The reason you keep saying it is extreme is because you are using a Western ruler to measure an Islamic legal system.
In the secular framework, the highest possible value is individual liberty and physical life. That is, liberty and life comes before the religion. From that baseline, taking a human life for a non violent sexual act is viewed as an extreme punishment. They believe that if there is no physical victim, the state has no business ending a life.
However, in the Islamic legal compass, the highest priority is the protection and sanctity of the religion. Our servitude to the Almighty comes first, even before our own life. Islam believes we are not here on our own. We are here on a purpose, which is to worship the Almighty.
Now when you compare these two worldviews, you will see the glaring difference in the moral compasses and why you feel the judgment is extreme.
From the Islamic standpoint, it is the crime itself that is extreme. Read that again. This is because bypassing private hotel rooms to commit an act of severe sexual immorality right inside the most guarded sanctuary on earth is an extreme violation. It is an unthinkable level of spiritual treason.
So, when an offender commits an extreme violation of a state ultimate sacred boundary, a competent court will mostly likely respond with the maximum deterrent.
You only think the punishment is extreme because your secular moral compass refuses to accept the weight of the crime. When you understand the hierarchy of laws that I established above, you will realize the ruling based on their framework, is not extreme. It is proportional.
This is the difference. You don’t agree. Fine. But that’s their legal view point. And do you think it is also fair to impose your own emotions on their jurisdiction?
All four of my work buddies leaving me here is not something I was prepared for. 😭
What is this man? I suddenly feel like a new hire all over again. What the hell🥲