Surrogacy is rapidly expanding in Nigeria, Kenya, Rwanda and elsewhere in Africa.
The combination of a wealthy elite vs millions of impoverished women will prove disastrous.
Transactivists are the new Taliban, the new Maoists, the new Puritans, see @andrewdoyle_com 's great book.
Enthusiastic, violent, masked, loud & totally uninformed & uninterested in facts or evidence. Sheep would be another good word. Fingers in ears, lalala....
We OBJECT
The Minister for Women and Equalities, Bridget Phillipson is quoted in the Telegraph as saying trans people must not be used as a “political punchbag”.
Which confirms what many women already knew: despite the job title, her priority is not women.
If it was, she’d acknowledge that it’s women - not trans people - who’ve been the ‘political punchbag’ of the past decade. And that women have been:
- Pressured to deny biological reality - or risk jobs, livelihoods and professional standing
- Forced to share single-sex spaces with men - in changing rooms, prisons, rape-crisis centres, hospital wards and workplaces
- Written out of their own language and replaced with terms like “pregnant people” and “cervix-havers” - then told they’re bigoted for objecting
- Dragged through tribunals, and court cases - just to keep rights that already existed
- Pushed aside while men take women’s places - medals, records, prizes, awards and commercial contracts
- Threatened and abused for speaking up
This is what it looks like to be used as a political punchbag. Being told to stay out of women’s spaces if you’re a man is not - that’s just basic safeguarding practice.
And the final betrayal? Philippson has refused to sign off the updated guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission - meant simply to give clarity on single-sex spaces after the Supreme Court ruling.
After years of women carrying the consequences, our women’s minister has chosen not to act on our behalf. And prioritise men’s feelings over women’s safety, privacy and dignity.
Which tells us exactly who is expected to keep taking the blows.
For anyone wondering why Helen Webberley is suddenly everywhere, it is because she is expanding her dreadful mercenary hormone-peddling service for vulnerable, autistic, same sex attracted young people into the US. She knows this is where the profits are $$$$$
I would be very concerned by the move of any government to legalize sex-selection before birth.
As I mentioned in my June 2025 report to the Human Rights Council "prenatal sex-selective practices, including sex-selective abortion, are a major form of sex-based violence".
https://t.co/CkBIeYmHUu
“How come Stonewall guidelines can be implemented immediately without discussion but Supreme Court instructions (also known as the law) can't be implemented for months until they get more guidance. "It's the law" is all the guidance they should need”
Well done Linzi!
It’s absolutely ridiculous to see a woman get banned from going to football matches just because she knows what a woman is.
I’m glad to see the beginning of the end of this sinister idiocy in many ways.
If you’re required to collect sex for equality monitoring but instead collect gender identity, you’re breaching:
- Equality Act duties (PSED requires sex data)
- GDPR (purpose limitation, data minimisation, accuracy, transparency)
Wrong data = unlawful processing.
Anyone doubting that Helen Webberley is as extreme as they come, she LIKED (in the days when our likes on X were public and visible) a @damekatydenise_ post about 'transgender fetuses' and how they could be operated on in the womb - and then followed the parody account!
This woman has size O breasts due to a medical condition, but has been denied breast reduction surgery due to a high BMI that is caused entirely by the weight of her breasts.
Meanwhile, fat men get vaginoplasty for the asking.
https://t.co/5BSuUdS4jl
I wrote this piece about Helen Webberley back in April 2024.
That she continues to travel the world as a snake oil saleswoman, profiting from poisoning vulnerable children, is deeply saddening.
Paywall removed.
https://t.co/l6fwHsGNkD
The UN did a report in 2024 acknowledging over 600 major medals in womens sport went to men identifying as women. Closer to 900 now. Please show me all the medals, awards, prize money men are losing?! Yeap. One way street. Women simply being treated as less worthy of their rights
"The BBC can survive this crisis. But first it must apologise to women for its biased coverage of what is one of the most important stories of the decade. Then its leadership must show courage and change the way it works." @DalgetySusan
https://t.co/dJcIIRajZ9
Nice to have a speedy correction but what kind of glitch in the production process results in a misrepresentative bit of trans propaganda? It wasn't really an accident was it 🙄
I am trying to figure out how this interview came to take place.
I can only think of two possible reasons:
1. Hubris got the better of Webberley for her US launch.
2. She mistook GB News for @BBC and Ben Leo for one of its array of gender-cowed, trans-corralled interviewers.
Sandie Peggie was put through the ringer for defending her lawful rights against the full force of a captured NHS and Scottish Government. She was forced to recount deeply personal details to the world, her family was hounded and smeared with unfounded innuendo, Sandie was betrayed by friends, and still she waits for the ET judgement.
That Carol Potter who oversaw this dreadful attack on a font-line A&E nurse is not only allowed to retire, but without censure, and before the judgement is made is an insult to every Fifer who rightly expects all front-line staff to be treated professionally and with care.
Every step of the way @nhsfife has made a catalogue of dreadful decisions, and the personal responsible for “leadership” throughout gets a golden pay off without any consequence.
If the new chair Pat Kilpatrick considers this debacle is a mark of “outstanding leadership” then @nhsfife as an organisation have learned absolutely nothing.
Dreadful.
https://t.co/PC2Ov5FFam
The UK Government says the FWS Supreme Court judgment must be implemented.
So why did its arguments in the High Court last week seem to be “trying to rewrite For Women Scotland”?
https://t.co/Jk2Ron7fCu