oceanplot

Citizen journalist covering the PNW.

[oceanplot @oceanplot]

https://t.co/bdla6rAO2y

[oceanplot @oceanplot]

https://t.co/ZZYQi5A1sW

[oceanplot @oceanplot]

This reporting is based on internal documents across multiple agencies and a clear timeline of events. The central question is not anyone’s intent, but process: whether a compliance review remained independent while political and institutional pressure was shaping it prior to release.

There is no “nefarious intent” in this or any of my reporting. The focus here is on documented process.

If there are specific factual inaccuracies, I welcome them being identified and corrected. Otherwise, the documents speak for themselves.

Furthermore, all primary parties, including Diehl, Edtl, Hammerson, ODOT, RLS, FTA, OIG, et al. were contacted for comment on the same day.

[oceanplot @oceanplot]

Before a state compliance review of a small Oregon transit district was finalized, a sitting lawmaker who would later run for governor had already sought access to it.

Internal emails show state officials discussing how findings should be framed for the contractor writing the report, while facing pressure to share preliminary materials with Portland political figures.

What is typically an invisible, technical process became a broader conflict involving regulators, contractors, journalists, and elected officials.

This investigation is based on years of internal ODOT communications, compliance documents, and public records obtained exclusively by oceanplot.

Read the full story below.

[oceanplot @oceanplot]

https://t.co/ZZYQi5A1sW

[oceanplot @oceanplot]

Before the report was finalized, internal emails show regulators shaping the findings while under conflict and political pressure.

Read the full investigation ↓

[oceanplot @oceanplot]

@DeniseDaffodil Thank you for the support!

[oceanplot @oceanplot]

https://t.co/ZZYQi5A1sW

[oceanplot @oceanplot]

Before the report was finalized, internal emails show regulators shaping the findings while under conflict and political pressure.

Read the full investigation ↓

[oceanplot @oceanplot]

https://t.co/ZZYQi5A1sW

[oceanplot @oceanplot]

BREAKING — Exclusive federal complaint details UPTD compliance dispute

An exclusive document obtained after publication of the investigation below reveals the full complaint behind a request for a federal investigation into ODOT and its contractor, RLS & Associates.

The February 9, 2026 letter, sent to the U.S. Department of Transportation’s OIG and the FTA, alleges the 2025 UPTD compliance review conducted by RLS for ODOT relied on incomplete information, misapplied federal rules, and imposed findings on actions previously cleared.

The complaint raises concerns about ODOT’s role in shaping findings, its involvement in local decision-making, and whether the contractor’s conclusions reflected independent analysis.

It also disputes claims of fraud or improper lobbying and questions how the compliance report circulated before its formal release.

The existence of the investigation request was previously reported. This document provides the most detailed account to date of the allegations behind it.

Federal officials say they can neither confirm nor deny whether an investigation is underway.

[oceanplot @oceanplot]

https://t.co/ZZYQi5A1sW

[oceanplot @oceanplot]

The following emails show internal ODOT communications in October-November 2025 regarding Representative Ed Diehl’s request for access to the UPTD compliance review.

Contact information has been redacted where clearly identifiable. Some institutional email addresses are shown where no individual is directly identified.

[oceanplot @oceanplot]

P.S. Follow me on Substack!

https://t.co/O4XfTCvMwz

[oceanplot @oceanplot]

Tomorrow, 8:00AM PST.

X | Substack | Facebook

[oceanplot @oceanplot]

I've been quietly working on a major story the past few months. It’s one of those stories where the layers keep giving way, a real rabbit hole.

It happens to intersect with someone running for governor in Oregon.

The investigation publishes this week. Stay tuned…

[oceanplot @oceanplot]

Tomorrow, 8:00AM PST.

X | Substack | Facebook

[oceanplot @oceanplot]

@SaltNLightPNW Incredible of you to say this. Thank you so much Jenn.

[oceanplot @oceanplot]

@MDDE777333 Thank you Michelle!

[oceanplot @oceanplot]

I've been quietly working on a major story the past few months. It’s one of those stories where the layers keep giving way, a real rabbit hole.

It happens to intersect with someone running for governor in Oregon.

The investigation publishes this week. Stay tuned…

[oceanplot @oceanplot]

@GatlinburgLocal Thank you!

[oceanplot @oceanplot]

Journalists do not lose their role simply because a war has begun.

Two weeks into a conflict is precisely when independent reporting matters most. Allegations that reporters are foreign agents for
investigating policy risk setting a dangerous precedent for everyone.

A free society depends on journalism that can operate without intimidation. That matters most durng periods of conflict. Freedom of the press forever.

[oceanplot @oceanplot]

EXCLUSIVE — Police report delay raises questions after suspect in two East Portland assaults released from custody

A set of Portland police reports describing two assaults in East Portland took more than three months to obtain through a public records request, a delay that raises questions about how crimes intersecting with immigration policy are handled and reviewed before release.

The suspect identified in the reports is Santos Thomas Puerto Rios, 24. Officers wrote that he was identified using a passport found on his person, and police records list Honduras as his place of birth.

The records describe two separate assaults on the morning of November 25, 2025 along SE 122nd Avenue in East Portland.

In one incident, a man standing at a bus stop told officers that Puerto Rios approached him, looked at him twice, and then struck him in the face without warning. The victim required a friend to translate during the encounter with police.

Investigators later connected the same suspect to a second assault earlier that morning involving a 69 year old woman. According to the report, this victim was taking out garbage from her residence when a man approached her, said “Hi,” and punched her in the face, knocking her to the ground.

The victim initially did not want to pursue a police report. According to public documents, her family later obtained power of attorney and contacted police so charges could be pursued on her behalf.

Records released to oceanplot also show the suspect was assigned both a federal and state criminal identification number, including an FBI identifier, both of which were redacted in the released documents. Those identifiers are used in national fingerprint databases that track individuals across law enforcement systems.

The time it took for the report to be released is notable, as other routine police report requests are typically processed quickly. These records were not produced for more than three months, even after repeated attempts to resolve the request in writing. In the time between, Puerto Rios proceeded through the court system without the public having access to the underlying police reports describing the assaults.

Taken together, the delay and the purported crimes illustrate a broader fault line that has emerged in the national immigration debate.

President Trump has recently pivoted to argue that immigration enforcement should focus primarily on removing illegal immigrants who commit crimes. At the same time, cities such as Portland have adopted sanctuary policies that block local police from sharing immigration status information or cooperating with federal immigration enforcement, including when someone is arrested or released.

In practice, this leaves cases like the one described in these reports in a gray area. A suspect may be identified through foreign documents or statements about place of origin, while local authorities remain restricted from confirming immigration status or coordinating with federal immigration authorities.

Court records show Puerto Rios pled not guilty but was later found unfit to proceed in the criminal case and ordered to undergo a psychological evaluation. A court notice indicates he was released from custody on February 20, 2026 while the evaluation process continues.

The result for Portland is a system in which violent incidents are investigated locally while immigration questions remain largely outside the public record. In this case, a suspect accused of two unprovoked assaults, including against a vulnerable individual, moved through the competency process and was ultimately released from custody while the broader immigration questions surrounding the case remain unresolved.

[oceanplot @oceanplot]

@MichaelmKopacz @divi There are reports that Iran war content was suppressed across a few platforms.

[oceanplot @oceanplot]

https://t.co/bdla6rAO2y

[oceanplot @oceanplot]

EXCLUSIVE — Police report delay raises questions after suspect in two East Portland assaults released from custody

A set of Portland police reports describing two assaults in East Portland took more than three months to obtain through a public records request, a delay that raises questions about how crimes intersecting with immigration policy are handled and reviewed before release.

The suspect identified in the reports is Santos Thomas Puerto Rios, 24. Officers wrote that he was identified using a passport found on his person, and police records list Honduras as his place of birth.

The records describe two separate assaults on the morning of November 25, 2025 along SE 122nd Avenue in East Portland.

In one incident, a man standing at a bus stop told officers that Puerto Rios approached him, looked at him twice, and then struck him in the face without warning. The victim required a friend to translate during the encounter with police.

Investigators later connected the same suspect to a second assault earlier that morning involving a 69 year old woman. According to the report, this victim was taking out garbage from her residence when a man approached her, said “Hi,” and punched her in the face, knocking her to the ground.

The victim initially did not want to pursue a police report. According to public documents, her family later obtained power of attorney and contacted police so charges could be pursued on her behalf.

Records released to oceanplot also show the suspect was assigned both a federal and state criminal identification number, including an FBI identifier, both of which were redacted in the released documents. Those identifiers are used in national fingerprint databases that track individuals across law enforcement systems.

The time it took for the report to be released is notable, as other routine police report requests are typically processed quickly. These records were not produced for more than three months, even after repeated attempts to resolve the request in writing. In the time between, Puerto Rios proceeded through the court system without the public having access to the underlying police reports describing the assaults.

Taken together, the delay and the purported crimes illustrate a broader fault line that has emerged in the national immigration debate.

President Trump has recently pivoted to argue that immigration enforcement should focus primarily on removing illegal immigrants who commit crimes. At the same time, cities such as Portland have adopted sanctuary policies that block local police from sharing immigration status information or cooperating with federal immigration enforcement, including when someone is arrested or released.

In practice, this leaves cases like the one described in these reports in a gray area. A suspect may be identified through foreign documents or statements about place of origin, while local authorities remain restricted from confirming immigration status or coordinating with federal immigration authorities.

Court records show Puerto Rios pled not guilty but was later found unfit to proceed in the criminal case and ordered to undergo a psychological evaluation. A court notice indicates he was released from custody on February 20, 2026 while the evaluation process continues.

The result for Portland is a system in which violent incidents are investigated locally while immigration questions remain largely outside the public record. In this case, a suspect accused of two unprovoked assaults, including against a vulnerable individual, moved through the competency process and was ultimately released from custody while the broader immigration questions surrounding the case remain unresolved.