@DereleenJ Die girl wil die camera wys, ag shame… bel die polisie, ja… die storie met deure en my mense… hulle het geweet Adams en Dereleen met hulle grootbekke… ai tog, ons mense is altyd in die verkeerde plek…😓
@BryanTorien It is a prop used by a social influencer, and because of that the Oranjezicht City Farm Market is overpriced to keep out the undesirable. We don't want the poor or locals in the vicinity, it spoils the ambience. We don’t want a blotch in our camera😉
@Bigdawg_Fly@MTV Gabor Maté frames excessive weight gain not as a failure of willpower, but as an addiction rooted in deeper pain and unhealed trauma. Seeing a young, slim Big Pun from the 80s makes that truth unforgettable, the violent South Bronx in his era was no child's play.
@henrywinter Chelsea's case is fundamentally about concealed payments, not overspending.
Everton's case is about directly breaching the PSR spending limits by £105m over period of 3 years. Everton fans are pissing in the wind.
@FaraiMazhindu I admire the eulogy for the ANC but you are mixing up our Constitution with the state the country is in and then blaming that on the path the ANC is taking. That confusion tells me this is not about the law it is about creating fear. Touché
@SABCNews DA and other challenger’s public messaging often gives the strong impression that the litigation is about stopping uncompensated expropriation, even though the legal arguments, examined closely, cannot ask the court to abolish nil compensation as a constitutional possibility.
Everton and Forest were PSR breaches which led to points deductions. Chelsea's historic disclosure settlement was not a PSR breach, even if those payments had been disclosed, it still wouldn't equate to one. Not in the same boat, not even in the same ocean. But you can keep trying to square that circle brains.😉
This sounds like the premise for a Netflix football drama. Football WAGs, an imaginary Swedish judge, Infantino’s Balogun ruling being dragged into Chelsea's "unfair advantage," all stitched together with secretive payments. As the days go by since the ruling, the Chelsea case is morphing into something out of this world. I wonder what the theme will be for the Man City ruling 😂
You correct, I think that if clubs want a guarantee sporting advantage they must use the following formula for talented players, the formula must include a undisclosed fee to the agent for the talented player, if you don’t do this then sporting advantage is gone. You can see why many clubs currently purchasing talented player are not guaranteed trophies because there one part missing undisclosed fees.🤯
The reason it's wrong isn't corruption, it's the inevitable commercial erosion of the sport. Maybe the simplest reason is this, why did we have drinks breaks, was really player welfare or just any oppurtunity to exploit for gains? They were not in any way beneficial to the game of football. We used those drinks breaks for commercials and that paved the way for 4 halves, possible rule change in the future.
FIFA claim commercial partners won't have a say. But we already have an example: a break disguised as 'hydration' that became a commercial opportunity.
I don't think you grasp what happens when momentum is interrupted in a game of football. That disruption can swing a game, one team dominating, and the other suddenly gets a free reset to get back into it. That's not neutral. That's intervention.
US World Cup was an adjustment but to have that experience again would be a punishment not progress in the game especially given that the investors are from US. I am sorry 4 halves being permanent in game of football🤢. That would be a nightmare, 3rd party investment especially commercial rights would lead to ridiculous rules changes just to benefit the commercial arm, sorry that would not work. Stop-clock football, overtime, what next first down😂
You were making solid points until you started advocating for a UEFA dictatorship. You have just pitched the exact same cartel that private equity firms are begging FIFA to become. You have swapped Infantino for a European suit and called it revolution. Next you will pull an American sports league and declare that winning a closed European tournament makes you “World Champions”, while the rest of the world was not even invited.
Talking culturally…what does that mean in the context of coloured cause you donned the hat that “you knows us”, you packed and boxed them and packaged them for your fans to get your likes and now that there is misunderstanding, you want to withdraw and say you were talking culturally and then to claim that the other person you antagonised with your words went there…this case and point when individuals with no idea about a people is platformed….unless you walked every coloured shoe in Cape Town you don’t get to cast aspersions…you know the coloured so well😉, you would have known there would be the raw and unfiltered…you knows us
If PIC decides to dump the shares tomorrow, it would have no impact on the editorial team, they would actually run on this breaking story. PIC has been at end some scathing stories by Media24, the Daybreak Farms & AYO Technology Solutions story is a few of the examples, so there is no protection racket currently in play.
@eNCA@Abramjee The "Uncle Brother" archetype, we all know him. That Uncle who speaks with absolute authority on everything, yet believes every conspiracy theory with his whole chest.
@swartluiperd@GarethCliff@News24 To suggest that shares owned by PIC give some editorial oversight is misleading. Dual-class share structures are common globally, they are not a backdoor for state control.