@AdMentemThomae Therefore, if God decrees a finite creature to exist, God cannot just create "pure act" and tell it to be small. He must create a composite being. He must provide a passive, receptive container (essence) to receive, channel, and restrict that boundless act of existence.
Suárez trying to explain how creatures are finite without a real distinction between essence and existence is just essentialism with extra steps. If act isn't limited by a really distinct potency, your creature is either God or a logical contradiction. Pick one! #Thomism
@AdMentemThomae Because act contains no negation, it is impossible for an act to limit itself. A boundary requires a passive principle that is not the act.
@AdMentemThomae They think they are being common-sense realists. To a Suarezian, an essence doesn't 'exist' at all until it's actualized, so they claim a real distinction is just a mental fiction. But then they can't explain how a creature stays finite without collapsing into Pantheism.
“Without any doubt there is a desire in all hearts for peace. But how foolish is he who seeks this peace apart from God; for if God be driven out, justice is banished, and once justice fails, all hope of peace is lost."
— Pope St. Pius X, E Supremi