Here for (sometimes) intelligent conversations on the topics of investing and corporate strategy; Former life in consumer / media / tech growth strategy
@TMTLongShort Interestingly blockchain infrastructure that supports agentic finance may be the way to play this. Looking at $BBBY (I know… but owns half of tZERO - developing for this thesis with the utmost regulatory care) and $FIGR who are pushing boundaries on their own (and may buy tZERO)
HOUSING AFFORDABILITY AND THE AMERICAN DREAM
For generations, the American Dream was simple and deeply human: the ability to have a home.
A place to build a family. A place to celebrate holidays. A place to feel safe, rooted, and proud.
Today, that dream is slipping further out of reach.
Many households now require two working parents just to stay afloat. Costs keep rising. Saving for a down payment is harder. Qualifying for a mortgage is more complicated. For too many Americans, owning a first home no longer feels like a milestone—it feels like a stretch.
We’ve lived through both extremes. In the early 2000s, getting a mortgage became too easy. A system meant to be built on trust and transparency fractured. When it broke, standards tightened, hurdles rose, and the possibility of homeownership moved further away for the people who need it most.
If there is one issue this country should focus on, it is this.
I don’t believe government should run private business. But I do believe in its role as a builder of infrastructure and a creator of smart incentives—ones that empower the private sector to make homeownership attainable again.
The obstacles are real and interconnected.
Land is expensive. Materials cost more. Skilled trade labor is harder to find.
Somewhere along the way, we lost focus on the workers who build things, fix things, and make everything come together. These jobs aren’t secondary. They are foundational. If we want affordable housing, we must once again value the hands that build it.
This problem won’t be solved with exotic financing or financial engineering. It has to be solved from the ground up—from land and materials to labor, infrastructure, and access to opportunity.
In many city centers, land has simply become too expensive. So the answer can’t be to keep building higher and hoping it works. We need to think differently—building outside city centers and extending economic hubs through transportation, reasonable commutes, and new places to work and live.
Technology is reshaping where jobs exist. Data centers and AI infrastructure are being built in remote locations, often far from traditional labor pools. That creates a challenge—but also an opportunity. If we extend opportunity instead of compressing it, we can unlock affordable land, create jobs, and make homeownership viable again.
This isn’t about artificially driving wages higher. Wages follow the free market. This is about financial literacy and clarity—helping people understand the true profit and loss statement of their home.
What can you afford? What should you save? What fits your income and your life?
Owning a home shouldn’t feel like gambling. It should feel like planning.
I’ve decided to make this a personal mission.
I can’t solve this problem alone, but that’s not a reason to wait. I intend to use my platform, my voice, my resources, and my businesses to help rebuild a system where homeownership is once again within reach.
The first home matters. The first night matters. The pride matters. The accomplishment matters—no matter the size, cost, or location.
Homeownership remains one of the most reliable ways to create and pass on generational wealth. Markets rise and fall, but rarely does someone lose everything by investing in their first home.
As a society, it’s time to refocus—away from the belief that everything must be bigger, shinier, and more extravagant, and back to what matters most.
A modest home. A yard worth mowing. A grill in the backyard. Neighbors you know. A place to call your own.
I’m committed to this mission because it’s hard. That means surrounding myself with people smarter and more experienced than I am, and staying focused on solving one of the biggest challenges facing our country.
Find the best talent. Solve the biggest problem. Leave something better behind.
The American Dream is still alive—but it needs rebuilding.
And I intend to help bring this part of it back within reach.
@marcuslemonis is retiring from $CWH, ostensibly to focus his efforts on $BBBY. Bullish for $BBBY- this must be Marcus' 5th major vote of confidence in this company. He's locked in, eyes on the big prize - which investors can see if they squint.
I don’t think you’ll know the minutiae until they announce the plan. But I think the goal is the same regardless - one unified form of equity.
So your math as a tzrop investor is, what % of the business do I own after conversion. If you wanted to make a full exercise of it- formulate your forecast of tzero financials, and compare the present value of dividends (tzrop) vs likely equity value (your equity if tzrop were converted), and based on how much tzrop you had vs equity you could convert to, you can make a call on whether you’re getting a fair deal. I would add a step and haircut the tzrop dividend value by a decent % as I think keeping that structure results in a higher chance of business failure.
I think the only way forward is a reasonable tzrop conversion. It’s a too weird part of the cap structure for their ambitions to ipo or secure a major partnership with equity.
If the tzrop holders are too greedy and vote it down, tzero will just languish for a few more quarters and die slowly.
Conversion of tzrop to commons aligns all tzero shareholders to a common point + opens the door to the future imo.
Time spent worrying about 10-20% dilution or mispricing or fair vs unfair at this point is time spent on the wrong issue. Gas costs money and it’s time to put the pedal to the metal… the success scenario is big enough to remedy the small sacrifices along the way.
News out today of $BBBY acquiring the remainder of $TBHC
Quick read-through:
-@MarcusLemonis is clearly excited by the early results of the store conversions and wants the full economics + a non-impaired brick-and-mortar operation
-This partially explains the large ATM tap- it’s the fuel for the stage 1 ignition (H1 ‘26) where the core retail strategy starts ticking. Importantly, today’s news suggests to me that the money WAS NOT raised out of fear of some kind of vendor financing doom loop or other spooky scenario.
-The gambit seems to be that budding successes will lead to share price crossing the warrant exercise threshold, providing the capital to pursue the full Everything Home vision in H2 ‘26 (though I’d expect some of this assembly starts earlier in the year)
-As I’ve mentioned before, the co is levering up on a housing rebound. At current prices it shouldn’t take much to ignite this thing. (This is before contemplating the potential of @tZERO)
https://t.co/ZdsnqpKXr6
@CViewer12329009@marcuslemonis@tZERO Eh the SP was in decline after earnings / reveal of the heavy ATM tap, not after the acquisition news. And this isn’t your favorite conspiracy theorist’s $BBBYQ. Sell and move on if you prefer…
A few points back:
-There is still a role for selective brick and mortar to play for the customer (BOPIS, impulse, last minute, can’t wait, stop on the way back from work)
-ALL of those Kirkland’s stores you’re referring to are being converted to Bed Bath stores or being shut down; the converted stores look great so far and it’s a relatively cheap upgrade
-Agree on cash burn, but I think that’s front and center of @marcuslemonis thinking. Part of this transaction is building back scale to the business which helps many aspects from vendor terms to financing.
-In my opinion, @tZERO needs to be separated or separately valued from $BBBY once it finds / proves out its business model (and obviously they agree, having announced intent to IPO). Very different businesses with some synergies, but will be forever penalized while rolled up into a confusing parent entity.
@CViewer12329009@marcuslemonis@tZERO Also keep in mind that ~2/3 of the original Bed Bath business was brick & mortar- it’s a huge pillar of the brand. If the plan is to get a ‘AAA of the home’ business going, that��s an important funnel.
To clarify, by ‘levering up on a housing rebound’ I meant that $BBBY is leaning into the home goods business even more heavily, not that they’re actively taking on more debt. The non-BBBY-held $TBHC debt is around ~$40m, easily covered by $BBBY cash, and likely to be paid down or terms renegotiated imminently.
It was not a strong recovery week. Still think that the demonstrated interest in advancing housing policy (particularly if portable mortgages are on the table) ultimately benefits the co.
@mcagney@Figure Interesting approach- can you elaborate on the benefits to the shareholders who exchange the publicly traded commons for the tokenized stock?