noticer of things | #1 in ranked blazerush | lil bro expert | AzaanShimane™️ enjoyer | nerf king | laser daddy | erstwhile govirgomont challenger | vet x4 | 🐐
Chinese bride gifts her partner a flagship GPU at wedding — he breaks down in tears
She handed him an ASUS ROG Astral RTX 5090 that costs around $12,000
also in cases like this anyone who can with 100% conviction say the men are rapists or jane doe is a whore/rapist herself is just kidding themselves.
we cannot know & there is no neutral ground. just wait 4 courts to handle it and then u can dis/agree after proper discovery
its kinda crazy bcz i was just thinking about this exact thing over the past days.
any writer worth their salt will know about Purpose, Audience and Message.
what am i writing about?
who am i writing to?
what do i want them to do with this knowledge?
basic planning 4 writing
Reminder to never ever *debate* your girl. You can (and should!) have lively disagreements about politics/society/culture with her, you can (and should!) both speak frankly, and you can (and should!) have a sparring partner in her.
What you absolutely must not do is push the big red button in your brain that says "dEbaTe". You then enter an entirely different psycho/social/emotional register of gotchas, facts & logic, speaking fast like Ben Shapiro, "This House Believes" etc.
Importantly, this is neither gender's fault. Men are (often) socialised into a weird non-cooperational debate mode where if you ask "source?" often enough you get to be the leader of your local high-school nerd team. Women are (often) socialised into an emotional panopticon where disagreement is seen as open hostility. Your job as 21st century men and women is to overcome this.
Crucially, the emotional subtext of the conversation should always be "we are on the same team". This is important because politics is "we are on opposing teams". So you both should make an effort to tune out propaganda and be two people sharing a safe, warm little corner in this mad mad world.
but because men can have a relatively more open debate and sharper disagreements on a topic they can scrutinize more and then the purpose is to engage in an objective debate which means your messaging can be less agreeable and more skeptical.
basic shit 101. hope this helos
does he think the eurocucks will forgive his debt or take massive haircuts to it or is he just tryna turn ukraine into haiti 2.0 rather than contributing to a stable european security architecture that takes russias natsec interests into account?
was finland invaded 1945-2022?no
mf just asked for 27bn to cover this year's shortfall (on top of the 45bn allocated alr to 2026 fy) and he's asking for another 70bn on top of the 45bn allocated to 2027 fy now????
blackhole
The war will cost 155 billion euros next year. And we need at least 70 billion euros more from you – for defense, for weapons, and for our resilience. This is a realistic amount. And I ask you to find this support. It will help us hold Russia back.
There are some very simple facts. We stop most Russian assaults on the front line thanks to drones. We cut Russian supply lines with these technologies. And our drones are helping to weaken Russia’s economy.
Right now, we could produce two or three times more drones – depending on the type. But we simply don’t have enough money for that. It’s true. Just imagine if we could put two or three times more pressure on Russia than we do today.
From an address to the participants of the European Council meeting. (4/5)
> anally rapes employee with industrial air compressor
> blows a four inch hole through the side of his intestine
> threatens to have him deported if he complains
> deducts surgery bills from his paycheck
idk man feels like maybe that deserves a little more than three years
just saw a guy who was literally greg from succession 6'6" overgrown boy lookin ass with the EXACT same hair following some old guy with a small notebook and pen in his hand who lowered his gaze immediately when i made eye contact LMaooooo
It's worth remembering that Obama, in 2016, was asked by The Atlantic's neocon editor, @JeffreyGoldberg, why he didn't do more to protect Crimea and E. Ukraine.
Obama said Ukraine is a vital interest to Russia, but not the US, and it'd be insane to risk war with Russia over it.