Michael D. Sellers

Ex- CIA, writer, filmmaker, fact enthusiast

[Michael D. Sellers @okmichael]

5/. Aftermath: the shooter is uninjured and moving normally immediately after the incident.

This isn’t a verdict — just a preliminary, time-coded record of what the video shows.

[Michael D. Sellers @okmichael]

4/ Shot 3: fired from a position to the side of and slightly behind the driver, after the vehicle has already passed the shooter.

[Michael D. Sellers @okmichael]

3/ Shot 2: fired from a lateral, roughly 90° angle, through the open driver-side window.

[Michael D. Sellers @okmichael]

2/ Shot 1: fired from a position in front of and slightly to the side of the car, as the vehicle is turning.

[Michael D. Sellers @okmichael]

1/I slowed the video of the Renee Good shooting frame by frame.

Rather than argue narratives, here are four things the video itself clearly shows about the shots.

[Michael D. Sellers @okmichael]

14/That ambiguity is the story.
https://t.co/BRXfeZntXC

[Michael D. Sellers @okmichael]

13/Without explaining whether those statements refer to the same evidence pool, DOJ leaves the public unable to judge the completeness — or candor — of the release.

[Michael D. Sellers @okmichael]

12/ Right now, the public is being told two things at once:
• “Here are the Epstein files, 40,000 of them”
• “We have over a million more.”

[Michael D. Sellers @okmichael]

11/This isn’t about guessing motives. It’s about basic disclosure clarity. The scale of the evidence matters when assessing whether DOJ is meaningfully complying with the law.

[Michael D. Sellers @okmichael]

10/ So far, DOJ has provided no clarification on that point — even as it emphasizes compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

[Michael D. Sellers @okmichael]

9/ If it’s a different million documents, DOJ has released an even smaller fraction of what it has.
And it owes the public an explanation:
Where did they come from?
When were they obtained?
Why wasn’t this disclosed earlier?

[Michael D. Sellers @okmichael]

8/If this is the same data universe referenced in the 2020 emails, then the December releases (≈10,000–30,000 pages) represent only a tiny fraction of material DOJ has known about for years.

[Michael D. Sellers @okmichael]

7/ It says SDNY and the FBI “informed DOJ that they have uncovered” over a million documents — language that can mean identified, aggregated, or re-categorized, not necessarily new.

[Michael D. Sellers @okmichael]

6/ The DOJ’s new statement does not say these documents were newly seized, newly discovered, or newly obtained.

[Michael D. Sellers @okmichael]

5/ In other words, by early 2020 the government was already dealing with data volumes that easily scale into the millions of files.

[Michael D. Sellers @okmichael]

4/Those emails describe:
• 60+ seized devices
• Hundreds of terabytes of data
• A single folder containing 600,000+ items
* More than "one million files"
• No reliable system tracking which devices were fully dumped, partially dumped, or reviewed

[Michael D. Sellers @okmichael]

3/Why this matters: internal DOJ emails from February–March 2020 (now public) show prosecutors already struggling to manage massive volumes of Epstein-related digital evidence. See EFTA00009804

[Michael D. Sellers @okmichael]

2/Is this “new” million documents — or the same universe of data that SDNY and the FBI already possessed since 2020?

[Michael D. Sellers @okmichael]

1/The DOJ just announced it has uncovered “over a million” additional documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. That statement raises a critical unanswered question the DOJ has not addressed.

[Michael D. Sellers @okmichael]

10/
Full analysis here ⬇️
https://t.co/sDnCpDrNzi